Fluorescent Probes Show Nuclear Pore Barriers in Living Cells Are Fluid, Not Gel-Like

Something had to be keeping the barrier in the cells dynamic
In test tubes the pore proteins hardened within two hours, but in living cells they stayed mobile.
Mark

Why does it matter that the barrier is fluid rather than a gel?

Mimi

Because the earlier answers came from test tubes, and they disagreed. This is the first time the dynamics were measured in the nanocanal of a living cell, and the dyes moved fast, so the interior is fluid-like.

Luke

Worth noting that's an inference from dye mobility. Lemke reads fast dye movement as a fluid state. That's the team's interpretation, not a direct picture of the barrier.

Mark

And what keeps it fluid?

Mimi

Two things. A transport receptor, and sugar groups on the barrier proteins. Without them, isolated proteins hardened into gummy-bear gel or solid within about two hours.

Luke

Be careful about the timeline. The two hours is the observation window in cells, and roughly when hardening appeared in the test tube. It doesn't tell us what happens beyond that in cells.

Mark

What about the edge-transport finding?

Mimi

Simulations on the JUPITER supercomputer put the main route along the pore's edge, not the center.

Luke

That's a simulation result, built on cross-linking measured experimentally. And Hummer himself says a central plug isn't ruled out, just not necessary.

Mark

And the Alzheimer's and Parkinson's link?

Mimi

The hardened test-tube protein resembles deposits seen in those diseases. The study says the work may help illuminate such processes.

Luke

May is the operative word. Nothing here shows a treatment or a disease mechanism in patients. It's a resemblance and a direction for research.

  • Every second, tens of thousands of molecules crowd through each nuclear pore, and the barrier inside decides which ones pass and which are turned away.
  • Isolated proteins hardened into gummy-bear gels and solids within about two hours, raising the alarm that the same process might drive neurodegeneration.
  • Inside living cells, fluorescent probes revealed the barrier staying fluid-like throughout the observation, something the cell must be actively maintaining.
  • A transport receptor and sugar-modified barrier proteins were identified as the keepers of that fluidity, and the model system matched living cells once both were added.
  • Supercomputer simulations on JUPITER place the main transport route along the pore's edge, overturning the expectation of a central flow.
  • The next question is whether this receptor-and-sugar mechanism can explain, or perhaps help prevent, the hardening seen in brain disease.

Every human cell guards its genetic material behind a double membrane, and every exchange with the outside world must pass through one of several thousand nuclear pores, narrow gates whose interiors had long resisted observation. Researchers from Mainz, Frankfurt and Wuhan have now shown, in living cells, that the protein barrier filling these gates behaves less like a rigid lattice than like a soft, flowing fluid, and that its restless character depends on a transport receptor and on sugar groups that keep its proteins from clumping. The same proteins, left alone in a test tube, harden into gels and solids that echo the deposits of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, a contrast that quietly suggests how close the line between a working barrier and a damaged one may be.

Inside every human cell, the genetic material sits behind a double membrane, and everything that moves in or out must pass through one of several thousand nuclear pores. The outlines of these pores have been mapped for years. What remained contested was the interior, and a team from Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, the Max Planck Institute for Biophysics in Frankfurt and Wuhan University has now reported an answer in Nature.

The researchers liken the pore to a medieval town gate: some travelers are waved through and others turned back. Signaling molecules and pathogens alike must pass, and each pore handles tens of thousands of visitors a minute. The selection is made by a barrier of proteins filling the opening, but what that barrier actually was had been argued over. Studies of isolated proteins suggested polymers, liquid condensates, or solid gels, yet none could say how the barrier behaves inside a living cell.

Edward Lemke's team in Mainz, working with Gerhard Hummer in Frankfurt, attached fluorescent dyes to the pore proteins of living cells. The dyes moved rapidly, showing the interior to be fluid-like, and stayed mobile across the full two-hour observation. In a test tube, the same proteins hardened within about two hours into gummy-bear gels or solids resembling the deposits seen in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. Something in the cell was keeping the barrier alive, and the team found it: a transport receptor, together with barrier proteins modified by sugar groups that prevent them from sticking too tightly. Added to the model, these reproduced the mobility seen in real cells.

The second question was where traffic actually flows. In pipes and rivers, the center moves fastest, while earlier work suggested pores work the opposite way. Hummer's group ran what they call the most comprehensive nuclear pore simulation yet, on JUPITER, Europe's first exascale supercomputer. It showed the main route runs along the pore's edge, and though a central biological plug cannot be ruled out, the physics does not require one. Miao Yu and Maziar Heidari are the study's co-first authors.

The findings reach beyond basic cell biology. Neurodegenerative diseases also involve flexible proteins turning rigid, and the team's next task is to learn whether this receptor-and-sugar mechanism can illuminate that process.

Inside every human cell, the genetic material sits behind a double membrane, and anything that wants in or out has to pass through one of several thousand nuclear pores. The scaffold of these pores is well mapped. What has been argued over for years is what happens inside them, and a team from Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, the Max Planck Institute for Biophysics in Frankfurt am Main and Wuhan University in China has now reported an answer in the journal Nature.

The pore works like a town gate in the Middle Ages, in the researchers' own comparison: some visitors are waved through and others are turned back. Signaling molecules and pathogens alike must go through the pores, and each pore handles tens of thousands of visitors per minute. The selecting is done by a barrier of proteins that fills the opening. That much was already known. What the barrier actually is was not.

Studies on isolated proteins had pointed in different directions. Some suggested stretched polymers, others liquid-like condensates, and others solid gels with a consistency like that of gummy bears. Edward Lemke, professor of synthetic biophysics at Mainz, who led the study with Gerhard Hummer of the Frankfurt institute, noted that such experiments could not say how the barrier behaves in a living cell. Was it a rigid comb, or something soft and flexible like yogurt or a liquid?

To find out, Lemke's team attached fluorescent dyes to the proteins in the pores of living cells. Each dye is a tiny glowing dot, and how it moves reveals how the protein carrying it moves. The dyes moved extremely quickly, which led Lemke to conclude that the interior of the pore is fluid-like. He described it as the first time intrinsic protein dynamics had been measured inside this nanocanal in a living cell.

The proteins stayed highly mobile for the entire two-hour observation. The team then ran a comparison in a test tube with isolated proteins. After about two hours, the protein mass there invariably turned into a rigid gummy-bear-like gel, or even a solid resembling the deposits found in the brains of people with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. Lemke called this a crucial turning point, because something in the cell had to be keeping the barrier dynamic.

Two things, it turned out. A transport receptor must be present, and the barrier proteins must be glycosylated, meaning modified with sugar groups so they do not stick together too tightly. When the team added both to the model system, the mobility matched what they had seen in the nuclear pores of living cells.

The second question was where transport actually runs. In pipes and rivers, flow is faster in the center than at the edges. Earlier studies suggested nuclear pores behave the opposite way, and the community had theorized a biological reason, such as a plug in the center. Hummer's group in Frankfurt built what they describe as the most comprehensive simulation of a nuclear pore to date, using the degree of cross-linking the Mainz experiments had measured. The calculations ran on JUPITER, Europe's first exascale supercomputer, at the Jülich Research Center.

The simulations confirm that the main transport route runs along the pore's edge, Hummer said. He does not rule out a biological cause such as a plug, but said it is not necessary from a physicochemical point of view. Miao Yu of Wuhan University and Maziar Heidari of the Frankfurt institute are co-first authors.

Beyond basic cell biology, the findings bear on neurodegeneration, since those diseases also involve flexible proteins hardening. The next thing to watch is whether the receptor-and-sugar mechanism proves informative for that process.

For the first time, we have been able to measure intrinsic protein dynamics within the nanocanal of a living cell and demonstrate that the interior of this canal is fluid-like.
— Edward Lemke, professor of synthetic biophysics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
The simulations confirm that the main transport route runs along the edge of the pore.
— Gerhard Hummer, Max Planck Institute for Biophysics
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su Phys.org ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti