Five Router Brands That Actually Support Their Hardware Long-Term

A router without security patches is a time bomb on your network
Outdated firmware leaves home networks vulnerable to botnets, data interception, and malware targeting older code.
Mark

Why does a router need updates at all? The hardware works fine.

Mimi

The hardware can last for years, but the software running it has a much shorter shelf life. Firmware updates patch security vulnerabilities that hackers discover over time. Without them, your router becomes a weak point on your network—a way in for botnets, malware, and data interception.

Mark

How long do most routers actually get support?

Mimi

The industry standard is three to five years. After that, most manufacturers quietly stop issuing patches. But the brands on this list go much further. ASUS routers have been known to get updates for over a decade.

Mark

What's the difference between ASUS and something like Ubiquiti?

Mimi

ASUS is plug-and-play—you set it up and it just works. Ubiquiti is more transparent about its support timeline, but it requires a steeper learning curve. You're trading ease for clarity and control.

Mark

What about OpenWrt? That sounds complicated.

Mimi

It is, but it's also the only option where the community, not a company, decides when support ends. A router running OpenWrt can theoretically stay secure forever. But you need to be comfortable with a technical interface.

Mark

So eero just updates itself?

Mimi

Exactly. It updates overnight automatically, no user intervention required. The trade-off is that you can't customize much—everything goes through their app.

Mark

How do I know which one to choose?

Mimi

Look for a brand that publishes a clear end-of-life policy or support status page. If a company is willing to tell you when a product stops getting updates, that's a sign they take security seriously. Then pick based on how much control and complexity you want to deal with.

  • Most routers silently stop receiving security patches within three to five years, yet roughly one in five households keeps theirs running well past that threshold — unknowingly hosting a vulnerability on their own network.
  • The threat is not hypothetical: outdated firmware invites botnets, data interception, and malware engineered to exploit code that manufacturers have long since abandoned.
  • A stark divide separates brands that publish transparent end-of-life policies from those that quietly let support expire and hope no one notices.
  • ASUS's RT-AC68U received updates for over a decade, eero's first-generation hardware is still patched nearly ten years on, and OpenWrt's community model means some devices may never truly reach end-of-life.
  • The path forward is clear but requires deliberate choice: selecting a router brand with a documented, verifiable support history is now as important as selecting one with strong Wi-Fi performance.

In an age when the devices quietly routing our digital lives are often forgotten the moment they are plugged in, a handful of manufacturers have chosen a different covenant with their customers — one measured not in gigabits, but in years of sustained care. ASUS, Ubiquiti, OpenWrt, Synology, and eero each extend security firmware well beyond the industry's three-to-five-year norm, recognizing that an unpatched router is not merely obsolete hardware but an open door left ajar on the household network. The choice of who maintains your router's software is, in quiet but consequential ways, a choice about how seriously you take the security of your connected life.

Most people plug in a router and forget it exists — an instinct that is understandable but quietly dangerous. The hardware may hum along for years, but the firmware governing its security has a far shorter lifespan. Without regular updates, a router becomes a liability: vulnerable to botnets, data interception, and malware built to exploit abandoned code. Consumer Reports notes that major brands like Netgear and Linksys typically end firmware support after three to five years, yet roughly one in five households waits longer than four years to upgrade.

The gap between manufacturers is significant. Some publish clear end-of-life timelines and honor them for nearly a decade. Others quietly stop issuing updates and hope no one notices. Five brands have distinguished themselves by doing the opposite.

ASUS leads among consumer router makers. Its RT-AC68U, released in 2013, received firmware updates through 2024 — a support window of more than ten years, extraordinary by any measure. Current models like the RT-AX88U Pro continue that tradition, further reinforced by AiProtection Pro, a Trend Micro-powered security layer included at no subscription cost.

Ubiquiti publishes a detailed vintage and legacy product policy, defining exactly what support level each device receives as it ages. Its UniFi Dream Router and UniFi Express typically receive updates for five to seven years. The trade-off is complexity — UniFi gear demands a more hands-on setup — but for those willing, the reward is a router treated like critical infrastructure.

OpenWrt operates on an entirely different logic. This open-source Linux-based operating system is maintained by a global developer community rather than any single manufacturer, meaning support timelines are determined by the community itself — and often never truly end. GL.iNet offers the most accessible entry point, shipping routers with OpenWrt pre-installed; the GL-MT6000 Flint 2 is the current flagship. The interface is technical, but for users who prioritize software longevity above all else, OpenWrt is the closest thing to a router that never ages out.

Synology brings to routers the same transparent support philosophy it applies to its NAS products. A public status page lists every model and its current support phase. The RT6600ax and WRX560 both run SRM, Synology's capable router operating system. The only uncertainty is strategic: Synology has not released a new flagship router since 2022, leaving some question about the company's long-term investment in the category.

Eero takes the most hands-off approach. Its routers update themselves automatically overnight, requiring nothing from the user. That simplicity is matched by genuine longevity — first-generation eero hardware from 2016 is still receiving patches nearly a decade later. The current eero Pro 7 supports Wi-Fi 7, and the companion app handles everything from setup to parental controls. The trade-off is control: there is no traditional web interface for users who want deeper configurability.

These five brands were evaluated not on raw speed or price, but on the transparency and duration of their software support. The most telling signal is simple: a company willing to publish a clear end-of-life policy is one that takes its obligations to customers seriously. No single brand suits every household, but each of these has demonstrated, in verifiable and documented ways, a commitment to keeping devices secure long after launch day.

Most people buy a router, plug it in, and forget about it for years. That instinct is understandable but dangerous. The physical hardware inside a router can hum along indefinitely, but the software running it—the firmware that patches security holes and fixes bugs—has a much shorter lifespan. Without regular updates, a router becomes a quiet liability on your home network, vulnerable to botnets, data interception, and malware designed to exploit outdated code. Consumer Reports found that major manufacturers like Netgear, Google, Linksys, and Amazon recommend replacing routers every three to five years because that's roughly when their firmware support ends. Yet about one in five households wait longer than four years to upgrade, leaving themselves unprotected well past the point where security patches are guaranteed.

The gap between manufacturers is stark. Some publish clear end-of-life lists and support their routers for nearly a decade. Others quietly stop issuing updates after a couple of years and hope nobody notices. A handful of brands, though, have built their entire reputation on the opposite approach—keeping devices patched and secure for years longer than the industry standard.

ASUS has the strongest track record among consumer router makers. The company maintains a publicly available list of products that have reached end-of-life, so owners can check whether their specific model still receives updates. The legendary RT-AC68U, released in late 2013, continued getting firmware updates into 2024—a support window of more than ten years. That's extraordinary in consumer electronics, where most brands cut off support after three to five years. Even when ASUS finally added the RT-AC68U to its end-of-life list in 2024, the company communicated it clearly rather than letting it fade into obscurity. For current hardware, the RT-AX88U Pro and RT-BE96U represent ASUS's modern lineup, both running ASUSWRT with regular security patches and feature updates. ASUS bundles AiProtection Pro, a Trend Micro-powered security suite that includes intrusion prevention and malicious site blocking, with no subscription required. That means security updates come from both the firmware layer and an active protection layer, giving ASUS routers a dual-layer defense that stays current.

Ubiquiti takes a different path. Unlike most consumer router brands, it publishes a detailed vintage and legacy product policy that clearly defines what support level each device receives based on age. Products in active support get full UniFi OS updates. Legacy products enter a long-term support tier with continued security patches but no new features. This transparency is rare in consumer networking. The UniFi Dream Router and UniFi Express are the most relevant models for households, both running UniFi OS with centralized management through the UniFi Network application. Ubiquiti typically supports devices for five to seven years before they reach "vintage" status—well ahead of the three-to-five-year window most consumer brands target. The trade-off is complexity. UniFi gear requires a more hands-on setup than an eero or ASUS router, and the learning curve is steeper. For users comfortable with that, the payoff is a router treated like critical infrastructure rather than disposable electronics.

OpenWrt represents a fundamentally different model. This open-source Linux-based operating system for routers is maintained by a global community of developers, not a manufacturer. When a router runs OpenWrt, the community decides when support ends—which often means it never truly does. The OpenWrt table of hardware lists thousands of supported devices across dozens of brands, from budget travel routers to high-end Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 7 models. The easiest entry point is GL.iNet, which ships routers with a custom OpenWrt-based operating system pre-installed. The GL-MT6000 Flint 2 is the current flagship, offering Wi-Fi 6 and regular firmware updates through GL.iNet's download center. For purists, the OpenWrt One, developed in partnership with the community, offers official firmware guarantees and an unbrickable recovery mode. The caveat is that OpenWrt isn't for everyone. The interface is technical, and initial setup requires a willingness to learn a new system. For users who value software longevity above all else, though, OpenWrt is the closest thing to a router that never truly reaches end-of-life.

Synology's router division has quietly built one of the most transparent support models in the industry. The company publishes a public product support status page listing every model, its current support phase, and whether it's still receiving updates—the same approach it uses for its NAS products, which are known for receiving updates for five to seven years. The RT6600ax, launched in May 2022, remains fully supported with regular security patches. The WRX560 offers the Synology experience at a lower price point. Both run SRM, Synology's router operating system, which includes parental controls, traffic monitoring, and multiple VPN protocols. The concern is direction. Synology hasn't released a new flagship router since 2022, and community discussions suggest some uncertainty about whether the company is still actively investing in routers. Even so, existing models benefit from Synology's established software lifecycle policy, which prioritizes security patches long after a product leaves store shelves.

eero takes a radically different approach. Instead of asking users to check for and install firmware updates manually, eero routers update themselves automatically overnight without any user intervention. The company has demonstrated genuine commitment to longevity: its first-generation eero routers, released in 2016, are still supported with firmware updates nearly a decade later. That support window rivals ASUS and surpasses most consumer router brands by a wide margin. Amazon, which owns eero, recommends replacing routers every three to four years, but eero's actual support timeline has proven far longer in practice. The eero Pro 7 is the current flagship, supporting Wi-Fi 7 and up to 2,000 square feet of coverage per unit. The eero app handles everything from setup to parental controls to update management, designed for users who don't want to think about router administration. The trade-off is control. eero routers are managed entirely through the app, with no traditional web interface for power users who want open-ended configurability.

These five brands were chosen by evaluating the transparency and duration of their software support, not raw Wi-Fi performance or price. The most important factor was whether a brand publishes a clear end-of-life policy or product support status page. A company willing to tell customers when a product stops receiving updates is far more trustworthy than one that doesn't. Any brand that exceeded the industry baseline of three to five years with documented, verifiable update histories ranked higher. The evaluation also considered community consensus from home networking forums where users share real-world experiences with firmware updates and security patches. The overall goal was to find routers that stay secure for the longest time, not the fastest and cheapest. No single brand is right for every household, but each of these choices has a demonstrated commitment to keeping devices updated long after launch.

A router that's no longer receiving security patches is a time bomb on a home network, vulnerable to botnets, data interception, and malware that targets outdated firmware.
— BGR analysis
A company that's willing to tell customers when a product stops receiving updates is far more trustworthy than one that doesn't.
— BGR analysis
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur bgr.com ↗
Nous contacter FAQ