Across the United Kingdom, fifty women have stepped forward to describe how intimate partnerships became instruments of coercion, with a swinging platform called FabSwingers serving as both the mechanism and the record of their harm. Six report rape; sixteen had private images shared without consent; many did not recognise what was happening to them as abuse until they saw their own experience reflected in another woman's story. The pattern these accounts reveal is older than any website — control disguised as liberation, compliance mistaken for consent — but the digital infrastructure has giv
Fifty women report coercion into swinging; FabSwingers faces scrutiny
Agreement extracted under pressure is not consent
Why did these women stay silent for so long?
Because they had been told—by their partners, by their own shame, by the way the world talks about swinging—that they had consented. Consent extracted under threat or fear doesn't feel like coercion in the moment; it feels like compliance. And compliance becomes invisible when everyone around you treats it as choice.
What does FabSwingers gain by not verifying identities?
Speed, scale, plausible deniability. Identity verification costs money and creates friction. Without it, banned users vanish and reappear. Abusers can operate with impunity. The platform can say it's not responsible for what happens off-site, even though the site is the infrastructure that made the abuse possible.
Why would police tell a woman she looked like she was enjoying it?
Because they didn't understand what they were looking at. They saw a video of sex and assumed enthusiasm. They didn't see the coercion, the threats, the anger waiting at home if she didn't perform convincingly enough. That's a failure of training, of imagination, of taking women seriously.
What would shutting down FabSwingers actually accomplish?
It would remove one tool. But the real problem is the men who use these platforms to control their partners, and the systems—police, platforms, culture—that don't recognize that control as abuse. Shutting down the site matters only if it's part of a larger shift in how we see coercion.
Do you think these women will ever feel safe reporting what happened?
Some will. The ones who've already left their partners, who've found support, who've heard other women's stories. But many are still trapped. One woman said she would have had unwanted sex that very evening if she hadn't seen this investigation. That's the real measure of what's at stake.
Le Pouls
- Six women report being raped by men met through FabSwingers, and one describes being held down by her ankles while her partner forced her to have sex with more than ninety strangers.
- Police responses compounded the harm — one victim was told she appeared to be enjoying the abuse in videos, and only three of sixteen reported cases resulted in convictions.
- FabSwingers operates without identity verification, employs moderators who received no safeguarding training, and ignored nine direct abuse reports, including one involving a sexual assault.
- The platform has been named in at least 329 UK police reports since 2023, covering rape, coercive control, blackmail, and stalking, yet Ofcom has not opened a formal investigation.
- A former safeguarding minister is calling for the site's shutdown under the Online Safety Act, while the domestic abuse commissioner urges police to recognise sexual coercion within relationships as a form of domestic abuse.
- For many of the fifty women, the act of coming forward has offered not justice but a quieter relief — the discovery that they are not alone in what they endured.
Across the United Kingdom, fifty women have stepped forward to describe how intimate partnerships became instruments of coercion, with a swinging platform called FabSwingers serving as both the mechanism and the record of their harm. Six report rape; sixteen had private images shared without consent; many did not recognise what was happening to them as abuse until they saw their own experience reflected in another woman's story. The pattern these accounts reveal is older than any website — control disguised as liberation, compliance mistaken for consent — but the digital infrastructure has given it new scale and new shadows in which perpetrators can operate. What is now being asked, of platforms, of police, and of regulators, is whether the systems meant to protect people are willing to look clearly at what they have allowed to persist.
Fifty women have come forward after the BBC published an investigation into one woman's experience of being forced into sexual encounters with more than a hundred strangers through FabSwingers, a platform claiming over half a million active UK users each month. What unites their accounts is not adventure but coercion — partners who threatened, gaslit, and refused to accept refusal, dressing control up as a lifestyle choice.
Six of the fifty say they were raped by men they met through the site. Sixteen had intimate photographs uploaded without their consent. Many did not recognise what was happening as abuse at the time, because they had technically agreed to try swinging — not understanding that agreement extracted through fear or a partner's anger is not consent. One woman told the BBC that, had she not seen the investigation, she would have had unwanted sex that very evening, a situation she had endured for twelve years.
Emily from Derbyshire was pushed into swinging while pregnant. For years her evenings were consumed by the site; when her young daughter wouldn't fall asleep, her husband would pull Emily away mid-bedtime story. She eventually left the marriage, estimating she had slept with between twenty and thirty men, and only later understood it as abuse. Another woman, Susie, was married to a serving police officer who spent years persuading her to join FabSwingers. After watching her have sex with a stranger in a hotel room, she stopped sleeping, drank heavily, and is now divorced and on antidepressants.
When women tried to report their experiences, police often failed them. One twenty-one-year-old, whose boyfriend controlled her entire profile and concealed the identities of the men she was forced to meet, was told by officers that she looked like she was enjoying herself in the videos. Her ex had forced her to appear enthusiastic, punishing any reluctance with further abuse. Only three of sixteen reported cases led to convictions; ten women raised concerns about how their cases were handled.
FabSwingers itself showed little urgency. Nine users who reported abuse directly to the platform received no response. Three former moderators told the BBC they had received no safeguarding training. The site does not require identity verification, making it easier for banned users to return and harder for police to identify suspects. Since 2023 it has appeared in at least 329 UK police reports covering rape, coercive control, blackmail, and stalking.
The platform maintains it is not responsible for private conduct between adults and that abuse reports are prioritised. But the evidence tells a different story. Former safeguarding minister Jess Phillips has called for the site to be shut down under the Online Safety Act, arguing that the word 'swinging' implies consent and silences those who were coerced. The domestic abuse commissioner has called for better police training in recognising sexual coercion as domestic abuse. Ofcom says it is extremely concerned but has not launched a formal investigation.
For now, most of the fifty women remain in the shadows. Many said that hearing another woman's story made them feel, for the first time, a little less alone.
Fifty women have come forward with accounts of being pressured or coerced by their partners into having sex with other men, often through a website called FabSwingers that claims over half a million active UK users each month. Their stories emerged after the BBC published an investigation into one woman's experience of being forced into sexual encounters with more than a hundred strangers. What unites these accounts is a pattern of control: partners who threatened, screamed through the night, gaslit their wives into compliance, or simply refused to accept refusal. The women describe not excitement or adventure, but coercion dressed up as a lifestyle choice.
Six of the fifty women say they were raped by men they met through FabSwingers. One woman reported that her partner forced her to have sex with more than ninety men via the platform, holding her down by the ankles on at least one occasion. Sixteen women say intimate photographs of them were uploaded to the site without their permission. Many did not recognize what was happening to them as abuse at the time. They had, after all, technically agreed to try swinging. But agreement extracted under pressure, fear, or the threat of a partner's anger is not consent. One woman told the BBC that had she not seen the investigation, she would have had unwanted sex that very evening—a situation she had endured for twelve years.
Emily from Derbyshire was pushed into attending a swinging club while pregnant. Her husband wanted more encounters, so they joined FabSwingers. For years, her evenings were consumed by the site. When her young daughter would not fall asleep by seven o'clock, her husband would come into the bedroom and pull her away, telling the child that Mummy had to leave. Emily's daughter would cry because the bedtime story was unfinished. Emily eventually left the marriage, estimating she had sex with between twenty and thirty men. She did not think of it as sexual abuse until much later, because she had agreed to try swinging. She does now. Another woman, identified as Susie to protect her identity, was married to a serving police officer who spent years talking about his fantasy of her having sex with other men. He eventually persuaded her to join FabSwingers. At one hotel meeting, he sat on a sofa and watched her have sex with a stranger—a practice called hotwifing. The experience broke her. She stopped sleeping, drank heavily every night, and is now divorced and taking antidepressants.
When these women tried to report their abuse to police, many encountered indifference or victim-blaming. One woman was twenty-one when her boyfriend put her on FabSwingers and controlled her entire profile. She did not even know the identities of some of the men she was forced to have sex with because her boyfriend ensured she could not see or speak to them. When she went to police, officers eventually dropped her case, telling her that she looked like she was enjoying the sex in the videos they had reviewed. She had explained that her ex-boyfriend would become angry if she did not appear enthusiastic enough, and would force her to have sex with someone else as punishment. The police made her feel disgusting. Another woman could not go to the police at all because her husband was a serving officer. Sixteen users reported abuse or non-consensual image sharing to police; only three cases led to convictions. Ten raised concerns about how their cases were handled.
FabSwingers itself has shown little urgency in addressing these harms. Nine users reported abuse directly to the platform and received no response, including one man reporting the sexual assault of his female partner. Three women say FabSwingers failed to cooperate with police investigations. Multiple users reported facing repercussions for flagging concerns, including being banned from chat forums where they could report wrongdoing. Three former site moderators told the BBC they had received no training on safeguarding. Two had worked in exchange for free membership; one worked voluntarily. Unlike some competing swinging sites, FabSwingers does not require identity verification, making it harder for police to identify suspects and allowing banned users to simply create new accounts. Since 2023, the website has been mentioned in at least three hundred twenty-nine police reports across the UK, including allegations of rape, sexual offences, coercive control, harassment, blackmail, stalking, and assault.
FabSwingers has told the BBC it has moderation policies and is not responsible for private off-platform conduct between adults. It says reports of coercion, sexual assault, and non-consensual image sharing are prioritized, and that it works with police without penalizing those who report concerns. The platform claims its moderation involves up to five site administrators, moderators, AI, and automated controls. But the evidence suggests these systems are not working. Jess Phillips, the former minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, believes FabSwingers should be shut down. She argues that calling it swinging implies consent, which silences the women who were coerced. Police need better training to recognize coercion and pressure to engage in sexual acts as forms of domestic abuse, according to Dame Nicole Jacobs, the domestic abuse commissioner for England and Wales. The National Police Chiefs Council acknowledged that victims deserve to be listened to and supported consistently across the country.
Ofcom, the regulator responsible for online safety, says it is extremely concerned by the BBC's findings and is speaking to the site's provider, but it has not launched an investigation. Phillips has called on Ofcom to look into FabSwingers very seriously and shut it down under the Online Safety Act, which requires platforms to remove illegal content and reduce risks of harm including controlling and coercive behaviour. For now, the women who came forward remain largely in the shadows. Many said they felt less alone after hearing Ruth O'Grady's story—the woman whose experience sparked this investigation. One woman said she was still not ready for anyone she loved to know what had happened to her. But at least, she said, she felt a little less alone.
Citations marquantes
I remember many nights of my partner keeping me up all night screaming at me, threatening me, and attempting to gaslight me into believing this was something I wanted. It was never what I wanted.— Woman coerced into swinging
Calling it swinging implies consent, and therefore puts the blame at the feet of the women, and that makes it silencing for those women.— Jess Phillips, former minister for safeguarding