Paredes grabbed Eric Garcia by the throat and struck Gavi in the face during on-field altercations after the final whistle at New York New Jersey Stadium. Argentina also faces stadium capacity restrictions and fines for discriminatory chants, plus a separate penalty for displaying a Falkland Islands sovereignty banner after the semi-final.
FIFA bans Paredes 10 games for World Cup final altercations with Spain
Multiple players involved in physical altercations including throat-grabbing and facial strikes during post-match confrontations.
Argentina have been one of the world's best teams. Today shows them to be one of the worst behaved.
Mark
Why did FIFA feel the need to come down so hard on Argentina specifically? Other teams have had heated moments.
Mimi
The scale and nature of what happened mattered. This wasn't a shoving match or heated words—it was sustained physical violence: throat-grabbing, striking players in the face, a coaching staff member punching an opponent. And it happened on the biggest stage in football, watched by 1.5 billion people. FIFA was essentially saying: this is what we will not tolerate at our showpiece event.
Mark
The Falkland Islands banner seems like a separate issue from the on-field violence. Why bundle them together?
Mimi
Because FIFA sees both as breaches of their code. The banner is political messaging at a sporting event, which violates FIFA rules. The discriminatory chants from supporters, the violence—it all paints a picture of an organization that lost control of its team and its supporters. FIFA was punishing the entire ecosystem of misbehavior.
Mark
Ten matches is a long suspension for a midfielder. What does that actually cost Argentina?
Mimi
It removes a key player from their next ten international matches. That's roughly two years of qualifying or tournament play, depending on the schedule. For a team that just lost the World Cup final, losing an experienced midfielder for that stretch is significant—it affects their ability to compete in whatever comes next.
Mark
Gavi said he didn't think Paredes should be punished. Does that change anything?
Mimi
Not in FIFA's eyes. Gavi's opinion doesn't override what the disciplinary committee saw on video. Gavi still got a one-match ban himself for his role in the altercation. FIFA was making a statement that regardless of what the players involved might say afterward, the conduct itself warranted punishment.
Mark
What happens if Argentina's appeal succeeds?
Mimi
The suspensions could be reduced or overturned. But they'd have to convince either FIFA's appeals body or the Court of Arbitration for Sport that the original punishment was excessive. That's a high bar. The evidence is on video. The conduct is clear. An appeal might shave off a match or two, but a complete reversal seems unlikely.
The Pulse
- Leandro Paredes suspended 10 matches; Nahuel Molina suspended 7 matches
- Paredes grabbed Eric Garcia by the throat and struck Gavi in the face at New Jersey Stadium
- Argentine Football Association fined $321,000 for violence, discriminatory conduct, and political messaging
- Argentina ordered to play next two home matches at 50% capacity
- AFA plans to appeal through FIFA and potentially escalate to Court of Arbitration for Sport
Paredes grabbed Eric Garcia by the throat and struck Gavi in the face during on-field altercations after the final whistle at New York New Jersey Stadium. Argentina also faces stadium capacity restrictions and fines for discriminatory chants, plus a separate penalty for displaying a Falkland Islands sovereignty banner after the semi-final.
FIFA has suspended Argentina midfielder Leandro Paredes for 10 matches and fined the team $321,000 following post-match clashes after losing the 2026 World Cup final to Spain.
The final whistle had barely sounded at New York's New Jersey Stadium when Argentina's loss to Spain—1-0 in the 2026 World Cup final—gave way to something uglier. What followed on the pitch was a cascade of physical confrontations that would eventually land midfielder Leandro Paredes in front of FIFA's disciplinary committee with a ten-match suspension hanging over his head.
Paredes, an experienced central midfielder, was at the center of the chaos. He grabbed Spain defender Eric Garcia by the throat, then wrestled Gavi to the ground before appearing to strike him in the face. The images circulated globally, part of a broader breakdown in composure that involved multiple Argentina players and coaching staff. Nahuel Molina, another Argentina player, seemed to punch Spain's Rodri—the tournament's standout performer—as he ran to celebrate his team's victory. Roberto Ayala, a member of Argentina's coaching staff, struck Spain's Dani Olmo in the face. These were not isolated incidents but a pattern of aggression that FIFA's disciplinary body felt compelled to address with severity.
The punishments came down hard. Paredes drew a ten-match ban; Molina received seven matches. Both men were also fined $90,000 each. Gavi and Thiago Almada, the Argentina midfielder, each received one-match suspensions and $30,000 fines for their roles in the confrontations. Ayala, the coaching staff member, got three matches and $30,000. These suspensions apply only to international fixtures, meaning club play continues uninterrupted, but the damage to Argentina's international calendar is substantial.
The team itself faced broader sanctions. Argentina must play their next two home matches at 50 percent stadium capacity—though one of those matches is suspended, contingent on future behavior. The Argentine Football Association was fined $321,000 total, a figure that encompasses not just the post-match violence but also separate breaches: discriminatory chants and gestures from supporters, and the display of a banner claiming Argentine sovereignty over the Falkland Islands after the semi-final victory over England. Of that fine, $100,000 must be directed toward anti-discrimination programs, and another $100,000 is suspended pending a probationary period.
The Falkland Islands banner—reading "Las Malvinas son Argentinas"—added another layer to FIFA's displeasure. The organization had appointed a special disciplinary and ethics prosecutor to investigate what happened after the final, and the scope of the inquiry extended beyond the physical altercations to encompass the political messaging that had surfaced during the tournament. FIFA's statement made clear that the World Cup, broadcast to an estimated 1.5 billion people globally, had been tarnished by scenes the governing body found unacceptable.
Argentina's Football Association announced it would appeal the sanctions through FIFA's standard process, and if that failed, would escalate the case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. The appeals process could take months, leaving uncertainty about whether Paredes will actually serve the full ten matches or whether some reduction might be negotiated. What remains clear is that FIFA has signaled it will not tolerate the kind of post-match conduct that unfolded in New Jersey, regardless of how disappointing the loss may have been for the Argentine side.
Notable Quotes
Gavi said he did not think Paredes should be punished— Gavi, Spain player
Want the full story?
Read the original at BBC News ↗
Sports