As Peru approaches its June 7 presidential runoff, a fabricated poll attributed to the respected Instituto de Estudios Peruanos began circulating on Facebook, falsely portraying Keiko Fujimori leading Roberto Sánchez by two points — a reversal of the actual standings recorded in IEP's genuine April survey. The institute, which had conducted no polls in May, moved swiftly to disavow the forgery. In the fragile weeks before a consequential vote, the episode reminds us that electoral perception itself has become a contested terrain, where invented numbers can quietly reshape the story a democracy
LaRepública.pe
· May 16, 2026
· governance
· 3 min read
High
Sourcing: Verified
Fake IEP poll on Fujimori-Sánchez runoff debunked by institute
◉
World & Diplomacy
16371 related articles
EU and Mexico Deepen Alliance Amid Trump Uncertainty
Google News · 80% match
US-China diplomatic talks intensify ahead of Trump-Xi summit in South …
infobae · 80% match
Trump y Lula se enfrentan en el G7 por condena a Eduardo Bolsonaro
Infobae · 70% match
El dilema de Milei: convertir la riqueza de Vaca Muerta en desarrollo …
infobae · 70% match
Venezuela and Russia seal 10-year strategic partnership accord
RT en Español · 70% match
Related Coverage
Google News · Aug 25
Crisis migratoria en Ceuta: el Gobierno activa Consejo de Seguridad Nacional
El Gobierno español convoca el Consejo de Seguridad Nacional para abordar la crisis de entrada de inmigrantes en Ceuta, …
Google News · Aug 25 OCON-Sur se desmanteló en pleno auge de la cocaína en AndalucíaLa unidad especializada OCON-Sur de la Guardia Civil fue desmantelada mientras Andalucía experimenta un aumento signific…
Prensa Latina · Aug 25 Chile crea comité en homenaje a Orlando Letelier a 50 años de su asesinatoChile crea comité coordinador para homenajear al excanciller Orlando Letelier en el 50 aniversario de su asesinato por l…
Prensa Latina · Aug 25 Singapur rechaza acusaciones estadounidenses sobre evasión de arancelesSingapur defendió sus operaciones de transbordo ante acusaciones de EE.UU. de facilitar la evasión de aranceles chinos, …
Geopolitical Impact
🌎
Fabricated poll falsely attributed to Peru's IEP spreads disinformation about presidential runoff, undermining electoral integrity and public trust in polling institutions during critical campaign period.
Escalation Risk
moderate
Confidence
HIGH
Peru
Disinformation campaign benefits right-wing candidate Fujimori by artificially inflating her polling numbers, while damaging credibility of independent polling institutions that serve as democratic safeguards. Reflects broader pattern of electoral manipulation in Latin America.
Similar to 2016 U.S. election fake polling narratives and 2021 Peru election disinformation campaigns that exploited social media to manipulate voter perception and delegitimize electoral processes.
Bias & Framing
⚖
Fact-checking article debunking a fabricated poll with neutral, evidence-based reporting comparing false claims against official IEP data.
Bias Direction
center
Confidence
HIGH
Straightforward fact-checking format using 'LO FALSO' (The False) vs 'LO VERDADERO' (The True) structure to systematically debunk misinformation with official source verification.
No statement from the source/creator of the fake poll
No analysis of why this particular fake poll was created or circulated
No broader context about misinformation campaigns in Peruvian elections
No comment from either Fujimori or Sánchez campaigns regarding the false poll
Economic Lens
📈
Fabricated poll misinformation in Peru's presidential election has minimal direct economic impact but signals risks to market confidence from political uncertainty and information manipulation during critical electoral period.
Market Signal
bearish
Confidence
MED
Financial services
Currency markets
Consumer confidence
Political risk premium
Peruvian households face increased uncertainty regarding economic policy direction. Misinformation about electoral preferences can distort consumer and investor confidence, potentially affecting spending patterns and savings decisions during a politically sensitive period.
Authorities may need to strengthen regulations on electoral poll verification and social media fact-checking mechanisms. Central bank may need to monitor currency volatility and capital flows. Electoral authorities should enhance transparency protocols to combat disinformation that could undermine institutional credibility.