In the aftermath of Iranian missile and drone strikes across the Middle East, a picture is emerging — through photographs smuggled out by anonymous service members — that diverges sharply from the official account. What was characterized as limited incursion has been quantified by the Pentagon's own inspector general as $3.7 billion in losses, nearly 60 aircraft destroyed, and six lives taken. The gap between what soldiers witness and what the public is told raises an enduring question about the relationship between military institutions and the democracies they serve.
Exclusive photos reveal extensive damage at U.S. bases from Iranian attacks
Six U.S. troops killed in the March 1 attack on Port of Shuaiba in Kuwait.
We're standing there with our eyes closed getting punched in the face.
Mark
So these photos came from active-duty people who felt they had to go around official channels. What does that tell us about the information environment inside the military right now?
Mimi
It tells you that people on the ground felt a gap between what they were seeing and what was being said publicly. They had cameras. They had access. And they decided the risk of anonymously sharing those images was worth it.
Luke
But we should be careful here. These are photos from service members, not independent verification. The inspector general's report—that's the hard number. $3.7 billion, nearly 60 aircraft. That's the official accounting. The photos are evidence of *something*, but they're filtered through whoever took them and whoever decided to send them.
Mimi
True. But the inspector general's numbers actually validate what the photos are showing. The scale matches. The damage is real.
Mark
The Defense Secretary used the word "squirters." That's a specific choice. What was he trying to communicate?
Luke
He was trying to say the defenses worked, that most of the incoming fire was intercepted or ineffective. The service members are saying that's not what happened—that the bases were hit hard and repeatedly.
Mimi
And the inspector general's report backs the service members. You don't lose nearly 60 aircraft and $3.7 billion in equipment if you're successfully defending against "squirters."
Mark
Why would the Defense Secretary characterize it that way if the damage was this extensive?
Luke
We don't know his reasoning. We know what he said. We know what the photos show. We know what the inspector general counted. Those are three different pictures, and they don't align.
Mimi
The service members' frustration is clear in what they told CBS News. They felt like they were being hit and no one was acknowledging it. That's a morale issue, a readiness issue, and a transparency issue all at once.
Der Puls
- Anonymous service members, risking their careers, sent CBS News photographs of gutted buildings and a severed E-3 Sentry aircraft — evidence they felt the public had been deliberately kept from seeing.
- The Pentagon's inspector general has now confirmed $3.7 billion in equipment losses and nearly 60 aircraft destroyed across eight countries, directly contradicting earlier official minimizations of the strikes.
- Six U.S. troops were killed in the March 1 attack on Kuwait's Port of Shuaiba, yet the Defense Secretary publicly described the incoming fire using language that implied the strikes were largely ineffective.
- Soldiers on the ground report that base defenses were inadequate against aerial assault, with concrete barriers designed for grenades offering no protection against precision missile strikes.
- The Pentagon has not responded to requests for comment, leaving a transparency vacuum that service members themselves are attempting to fill at personal risk.
In the aftermath of Iranian missile and drone strikes across the Middle East, a picture is emerging — through photographs smuggled out by anonymous service members — that diverges sharply from the official account. What was characterized as limited incursion has been quantified by the Pentagon's own inspector general as $3.7 billion in losses, nearly 60 aircraft destroyed, and six lives taken. The gap between what soldiers witness and what the public is told raises an enduring question about the relationship between military institutions and the democracies they serve.
Service members stationed across the Middle East have taken an extraordinary step: sending photographs to CBS News that they say reveal a reality the American public has not been shown. The images document widespread destruction at U.S. military installations following Iranian missile and drone strikes — damage that official statements, in their view, have significantly understated.
At Prince Sultan Air Force Base in Saudi Arabia, a Boeing E-3 Sentry aircraft sits with its tail section destroyed and fuselage burned black. Nearby buildings have been hollowed out by fire. The concrete barriers that once protected against ground-level threats stand untouched — a reminder that the defenses in place were never designed for what came from the sky. Camp Buehring in Kuwait, a critical Army staging hub, shows comparable destruction.
The Pentagon's inspector general has now provided the numbers to match the images: $3.7 billion in equipment losses, nearly 60 aircraft destroyed, damage spread across bases in eight countries. The report, submitted to Congress, represents the first full accounting of the strikes — and stands in stark contrast to earlier characterizations, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's use of the term 'squirters' to describe the incoming fire, a word implying minor, largely deflected attacks.
Six U.S. troops died in the March 1 strike on Kuwait's Port of Shuaiba. The soldiers who shared these photographs say the losses — human and material — have not been honestly conveyed. 'We're standing there with our eyes closed getting punched in the face,' one told CBS News. The Pentagon has not responded to requests for comment, and the questions left unanswered — about readiness, transparency, and accountability — remain very much open.
Active-duty service members, speaking on condition of anonymity because military media rules forbid them from talking to reporters, sent photographs to CBS News this week showing what they say the American public has not been told: the scale of destruction across U.S. military installations in the Middle East after Iranian missile and drone strikes.
The images are stark. At Prince Sultan Air Force Base in Saudi Arabia, a Boeing E-3 Sentry—a four-engine aircraft whose rotating radar dome collects intelligence from the air—took a direct hit. The tail section is gone. The fuselage is charred black. In other frames from the same base, buildings stand as hollow shells, their walls intact but their interiors gutted, positioned incongruously next to concrete T-walls that were once considered essential protection against grenades and mortars but offered no defense against an aerial assault.
Camp Buehring in Kuwait, a major hub where the U.S. Army stages ground troops, armored vehicles, and aircraft in a remote desert region northwest of Kuwait City, shows similar damage in the photographs. The images contradict the initial public characterization of the attacks as limited in scope. One service member told CBS News: "This is major damage to our bases that hasn't been communicated to the American public. We're standing there with our eyes closed getting punched in the face."
The Pentagon's inspector general released a report this week that quantifies what the photographs suggest. The assessment tallies equipment losses at $3.7 billion across U.S. bases in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman, and Jordan. Nearly 60 aircraft were lost. The inspector general's mandatory report to Congress marks the first comprehensive accounting of the damage, a stark contrast to earlier statements that downplayed the severity of the strikes.
The March 1 attack on the Port of Shuaiba in Kuwait killed six U.S. troops. In the days after, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth characterized some of the incoming fire as "squirters"—a term suggesting minor or ineffective strikes that barely penetrated defenses. The service members who sent the photographs reject that framing entirely. "These are not 'squirters' getting through," one told CBS News. "We're not defending these bases. We're just watching them get destroyed."
The Pentagon did not respond to requests for comment. The photographs, obtained exclusively by CBS News, represent the first visual documentation of the full extent of the damage—a record that service members felt compelled to share because official channels, in their view, were not conveying the reality of what had occurred. The images raise questions about base defenses, military readiness in the region, and what the American public has been told about the true cost of the Iranian strikes.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
This is major damage to our bases that hasn't been communicated to the American public.— Deployed service member to CBS News
We're not defending these bases. We're just watching them get destroyed.— Service member, responding to characterization of attacks as minor
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei CBS News ↗
War & Conflict