Six months into a war that was never given a clear purpose, the United States finds itself in a familiar posture — committed without a plan, credible to no one, and unable to leave. Leon Panetta, who has watched American military power from its highest offices, warns that the conflict with Iran is hardening into the kind of indefinite entanglement that has consumed a generation of soldiers and strategists before it. The danger, he suggests, is not merely military but civilizational: a nation visibly fractured at the command level, its threats ignored, its allies uncertain, while rival powers s
Ex-Pentagon chief warns Iran conflict risks becoming 'forever war' amid military leadership turmoil
US service members deployed to war zone amid Pentagon turmoil; USS Abraham Lincoln crew experienced deteriorating conditions and mental health issues during record 260+ day deployment.
caught in the worst of every world because not only does he not have credibility, but any threats he makes are totally ignored
Mark
So Panetta is saying Trump is stuck. What does that actually mean—what are the real constraints?
Mimi
He's arguing Trump can't admit failure, won't negotiate, and doesn't have the credibility to escalate. So he's trapped in a middle ground that just perpetuates the war.
Luke
But we should be careful here. Panetta is offering his interpretation of Trump's options. We don't know what Trump actually intends or what conversations are happening behind closed doors.
Mark
Fair. But the Pentagon leadership chaos—is that real or is it being overstated?
Mimi
Dan Driscoll did resign this week. That's documented. The question is whether it signals broader dysfunction or just normal personnel churn.
Luke
Exactly. The Pentagon says it's "firing on all cylinders." Panetta says there's turmoil. Both statements can be true—there can be real friction and real work happening simultaneously. We don't have independent confirmation of the severity.
Mark
What about the public opinion piece? Is that solid?
Mimi
Panetta cited polling showing Americans oppose the war and think it was a mistake. He didn't provide the specific poll, but that's a factual claim that can be checked.
Luke
Right. And it matters because it suggests Trump is politically isolated on this. But we'd want to see the actual numbers and methodology before treating it as definitive.
Mark
The USS Abraham Lincoln—that's the clearest human cost detail, isn't it?
Mimi
Yes. 260 days without a port visit is documented. Crew conditions deteriorated. That's concrete and verifiable.
Luke
And it raises a real question about military planning and personnel welfare. Though we should note that extended deployments happen in wartime; the question is whether this one was managed poorly or was simply the cost of the operation.
Mark
So what's the thing Panetta is really worried about?
Mimi
That America looks weak to its real adversaries—China, Russia, North Korea—while it's tied up in a Middle Eastern stalemate with no exit.
Luke
Which is a strategic argument, not a factual claim. It's his assessment. A reasonable one, maybe, but it's analysis, not reporting.
Il Polso
- Leon Panetta warns Trump has 'boxed himself in' with no viable exit from the Iran war — retreat is politically unthinkable, stalemate is endless, and escalation requires credibility he has already exhausted.
- The abrupt resignation of Army Secretary Dan Driscoll amid clashes with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signals to China, Russia, and North Korea that American military leadership is fractured at its core.
- Trump's repeated false claims that a deal is imminent and the Strait of Hormuz remains open have hollowed out his leverage, leaving adversaries free to ignore his threats entirely.
- The USS Abraham Lincoln's 260-plus-day deployment without a port visit — and the crew's deteriorating mental health — reveals a military leadership that failed to plan for the human cost of its own war.
- Public opinion has turned: a majority of Americans now believe the Iran war was a mistake, while Vice President Vance admitted he does not know when it will end — a candid confession of strategic drift.
- Panetta's deepest fear is not Iran itself but the window of opportunity the stalemate opens for China, Russia, and North Korea to consolidate their alliance while America's attention and credibility are consumed elsewhere.
Six months into a war that was never given a clear purpose, the United States finds itself in a familiar posture — committed without a plan, credible to no one, and unable to leave. Leon Panetta, who has watched American military power from its highest offices, warns that the conflict with Iran is hardening into the kind of indefinite entanglement that has consumed a generation of soldiers and strategists before it. The danger, he suggests, is not merely military but civilizational: a nation visibly fractured at the command level, its threats ignored, its allies uncertain, while rival powers study the spectacle and draw their own conclusions.
Leon Panetta, former CIA director and Pentagon chief under Barack Obama, sat with the Guardian this week to offer a blunt verdict on the war Trump launched against Iran six months ago: it is going nowhere, and risks becoming yet another generational stalemate in a region that has swallowed American ambition before.
His warning lands against a backdrop of visible disorder inside the Defense Department. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll resigned abruptly following reported friction with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over personnel decisions. For Panetta, the timing is not incidental — it is the message. 'Service members are going to war at a time when there's tremendous turmoil at the Pentagon, in the command structure, which really creates a sense that there's nobody in charge,' he said. That perception, he argues, is precisely what rivals like China, Russia, and North Korea are watching for.
On the war itself, Panetta sees Trump trapped between three bad options: admit failure, accept an open-ended stalemate of periodic strikes and counterstrikes, or escalate by seizing the Strait of Hormuz. The third path demands political will and credibility — both of which, Panetta contends, Trump has already spent through repeated false claims that a deal is close and the strait is open. Those statements have left him unable to make threats that anyone takes seriously.
The human toll is already accumulating. The USS Abraham Lincoln completed a record deployment of more than 260 days without a port visit, with crew members reporting deteriorating conditions and mental health struggles. Panetta cited this as evidence of a leadership that has failed to plan for the people it sends into harm's way.
Majority public opinion has turned against the conflict. When Vice President Vance was asked whether the war would end before November's midterms, he said he did not know — and suggested the Iranians be asked instead. The Pentagon, for its part, insisted it was 'firing on all cylinders.' Panetta's deeper concern remains unanswered: that while America is mired in a Middle Eastern stalemate without an exit, its adversaries are consolidating and watching.
Leon Panetta, who ran the Pentagon under Barack Obama and later headed the CIA, sat down with the Guardian this week to deliver a stark assessment of the war Trump launched against Iran six months ago. The conflict, he said plainly, is headed nowhere—and risks calcifying into the kind of grinding, generational stalemate that has defined America's Middle East entanglements for the past two decades.
Panetta's warning arrives at a moment of visible strain inside the Defense Department itself. Dan Driscoll, the Army secretary, resigned abruptly this week following reports of friction with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over a series of personnel decisions. The timing matters. Panetta argues that this internal turbulence sends a message to America's rivals—China, Russia, North Korea, Iran—that the United States is fractured and uncertain. "Service members are going to war at a time when there's tremendous turmoil at the Pentagon, in the command structure, which really creates a sense that there's nobody in charge," he said. That perception of weakness, he believes, is precisely what adversaries are watching for and exploiting.
On the substance of the conflict itself, Panetta sees Trump trapped. The president, he argues, has "boxed himself in" with no good exits. The first option—walking away and admitting failure—seems politically unthinkable for Trump. The second is to accept an indefinite stalemate, with periodic attacks and counterattacks, both sides tiptoeing around escalation while refusing to negotiate or surrender. That path, Panetta believes, produces exactly what everyone feared: another forever war in the Middle East, stretching on without resolution or purpose. The third option is to escalate decisively, seizing control of the Strait of Hormuz and eliminating Iran's leverage over global trade. But that requires political will and credibility—both of which, Panetta suggests, Trump has already spent.
Trump has repeatedly claimed a deal is imminent and that the strait remains open. Neither claim is true. Those false statements have hollowed out his credibility, Panetta argues, leaving him in a position where threats carry no weight. "For a lot of reasons, right now, he's caught in the worst of every world because not only does he not have credibility, but any threats he makes are totally ignored," Panetta said. He predicted the conflict will drag on for at least another six months without resolution.
The human cost is already visible. The USS Abraham Lincoln returned to Thailand this week after a record-breaking deployment lasting more than 260 days without a port visit—all in support of operations against Iran. Crew members reported deteriorating living conditions and mental health struggles. Panetta pointed to this as evidence not just of a war going badly, but of a military leadership that has failed to plan for the welfare of the people it sends into harm's way. "You do not deploy people endlessly into a war zone without making some kind of plans for rotation," he said.
Public opinion has shifted against the conflict. Polling cited by Panetta shows a majority of Americans now believe the war with Iran was a mistake and oppose it. Vice President JD Vance, asked this week whether he expected the conflict to end by November's midterm elections, said he did not know and suggested the Iranians be asked instead—a response that underscores the administration's uncertainty about its own military operation.
Panetta's core concern extends beyond Iran itself. He worries that while the United States is bogged down in a Middle Eastern stalemate with no exit strategy, China, Russia, and North Korea are consolidating their own alliance and watching American weakness with interest. The Pentagon, in response, issued a statement insisting it was "firing on all cylinders" under Hegseth's leadership and that claims of disarray were "completely baseless." But Panetta's argument—that visible leadership turmoil sends a message of weakness to adversaries at a moment when America faces multiple serious threats—remains unanswered.
Citazioni salienti
It's no mystery that the United States and Iran are caught in a terrible stalemate, in which there really are very few options available to bring this war to an end— Leon Panetta, former Defense Secretary
Service members are going to war at a time when there's tremendous turmoil at the Pentagon, in the command structure, which really creates a sense that there's nobody in charge— Leon Panetta
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su The Guardian ↗
War & Conflict