EU proposes strict social media curbs for under-15s with parental controls

Too many children exposed too early to a world they're not ready for
Von der Leyen's statement on why the EU is restricting social media access for minors.
Mark

So the EU is essentially saying no social media for kids under 13, and then a very limited version for teenagers. How does that actually work for a 14-year-old who wants to use Instagram?

Mimi

Their parent or guardian would set up the account on their own Instagram, and the teenager could access it through that parent account. It's capped at one hour a day. The idea is the parent maintains control and visibility.

Luke

But how does Instagram—or any platform—actually enforce the one-hour limit? Is there a technical mechanism built in, or is this just a rule that companies promise to follow?

Mimi

The legislation requires companies to prove their platforms are safe by design. That would presumably include technical controls, but the details of how that works aren't fully spelled out yet.

Mark

What happens if a tech company doesn't comply?

Mimi

Fines up to 6 percent of global annual sales. For a company like Meta, that's substantial.

Luke

Right, but Australia banned social media for under-16s last year and hasn't fined a single company yet, despite evidence that minors are still accessing platforms. So we don't know if the EU will actually enforce this either.

Mark

Why did Australia struggle?

Luke

Enforcement is genuinely hard. You'd need to verify age at scale across millions of users, and you'd need to catch violations. The EU says it'll use an existing age verification app, but critics worry about privacy even with that system.

Mimi

France tried something similar and their court blocked it on freedom of expression grounds. So there's a legal question too—can you actually ban this without infringing on rights?

Mark

So this could face court challenges in Europe as well.

Mimi

Almost certainly. And tech companies will fight it in the months ahead as the legislation is debated.

Luke

The real question is whether any of this changes what actually happens on the ground. Public support is high—92 percent of EU respondents say protecting kids online is a priority. But support and enforcement are different things.

  • The EU has proposed one of the most sweeping digital age restrictions in the world, banning under-13s from social media entirely and capping 13-to-15-year-olds at one hour daily through parent-controlled accounts.
  • Tech giants face fines of up to 6% of global annual sales if they cannot demonstrate their platforms are safe by design — meaning addictive features like infinite scroll and autoplay must go.
  • The proposal arrives under mounting pressure: the EU already found Meta's design choices encouraged compulsive use among youth, and Meta separately agreed to an $18 billion US settlement over child harm claims.
  • France's highest court blocked a nearly identical national ban last month on freedom of expression grounds, and Australia's under-16 ban has produced no fines despite evidence of widespread non-compliance.
  • The legislation still requires approval from member states and the European Parliament, with tech companies expected to mount significant opposition before any rules take effect.

Across Europe, a quiet but consequential question has moved into law: at what age does a child become ready to meet the internet alone? The European Commission's proposed Kids Act draws that line at 15, barring younger children from independent social media accounts and demanding that platforms prove they are built for safety rather than compulsion. The legislation reflects a growing conviction among policymakers that the architecture of digital platforms — not merely their content — shapes young minds in ways that warrant collective intervention. Whether the law can be enforced as firmly as it is written remains the harder question, one that France and Australia have already begun to answer with cautionary results.

The European Commission has proposed legislation that would fundamentally change how children across the EU engage with social media. Under the EU Kids Act, children under 13 would be banned from platforms entirely. Those aged 13 to 15 could only access social media through parent-controlled accounts, limited to one hour per day. Independent accounts would remain off-limits until age 15. The rules would cover not just TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat, but also YouTube, AI chatbots, and online games.

Commission President Ursula von der Leyen framed the proposal as restoring parental authority in a digital landscape children are not yet equipped to navigate. Beyond age limits, the legislation would require platforms to prove they are safe by design — stripping out features engineered to maximize engagement, such as infinite scroll and algorithmic recommendations. Companies failing to comply would face fines of up to 6% of global annual sales, and each platform would need to submit detailed child safety plans covering all users under 18.

The proposal follows months of escalating scrutiny. The Commission found earlier this year that Meta's design choices on Facebook and Instagram encouraged compulsive use among young people — a finding Meta disputed. The company separately agreed to an $18 billion settlement with US states over child harm allegations, denying wrongdoing. The Kids Act would supersede existing national efforts in France and Spain, creating a single binding standard across all member states.

The road to enforcement, however, is far from clear. France's attempt at a similar ban was struck down by its highest court on freedom of expression grounds just last month. Australia banned social media for under-16s last year, yet no platform has been fined despite research showing continued underage access. Privacy concerns around age verification also linger, though the Commission says it will rely on an existing EU app that collects and shares no personal data. With 92% of EU respondents calling child online protection a top priority, public support is strong — but turning that consensus into rules that actually change behavior has proven far more difficult than the polling suggests.

The European Commission has unveiled legislation that would fundamentally reshape how children across the EU interact with social media, drawing a hard line at age 15. Under the proposed EU Kids Act, children younger than 13 would be barred from social media platforms entirely. Those between 13 and 15 could access platforms only through accounts created and controlled by their parents or guardians, with usage capped at one hour per day. Only at 15 would a young person be permitted to establish their own account. The restrictions would apply not just to familiar apps like TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat, but also to YouTube, video-sharing services, AI chatbots, and online games.

EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen framed the move as returning authority to parents. "Too many children are being exposed too early to an online world they are not ready to navigate," she said, pointing to the permanence of digital mistakes and the way bullying can follow a child beyond the schoolyard. The legislation would require social media companies to demonstrate that their platforms are safe by design—meaning they must eliminate features designed to encourage compulsive use, such as infinite scroll, autoplaying videos, and algorithmic recommendations tailored to keep users engaged. Companies that fail to meet these standards would face fines of up to 6 percent of their global annual sales. Von der Leyen emphasized that age restrictions alone would not exempt tech companies from responsibility for the content on their platforms. Each company would be required to submit detailed child safety plans and ensure that for every user under 18, the principle of safety by design is applied.

The proposal builds on months of escalating pressure on tech platforms. In July, the European Commission found that Meta's design choices on Facebook and Instagram could encourage compulsive use, particularly among young people. Meta disputed the findings, saying the company had taken significant steps to protect teenagers. The same company agreed in August to an $18 billion settlement with US states and territories over claims that its platforms harmed children, though Meta denied wrongdoing as part of the deal. The EU Kids Act represents a more comprehensive attempt to regulate the relationship between children and digital platforms at the continental level.

Several EU member states have already moved on their own. France and Spain have announced plans to restrict social media for minors, but the new EU-wide legislation would supersede those national efforts. The regulation would be legally binding across all member states, and the Commission has reportedly warned some countries that they would need to repeal existing national laws once the act takes effect. This centralized approach reflects a determination to prevent a patchwork of different rules across Europe.

The path to implementation, however, is uncertain. France offers a cautionary example. The Macron government drafted legislation banning social media for under-15s, but the country's highest court blocked it last month on freedom of expression grounds. French ministers have since revised their approach. Critics of social media bans for children have raised privacy concerns, particularly about age verification processes that might require teenagers to submit personal information. The Commission has said it would use an existing EU age verification app that collects no personal data and shares none with platforms, but skepticism about such systems remains.

Australia's experience provides another warning. That country banned social media for under-16s last year, but enforcement has proven difficult. As of this month, no tech company has been fined despite research showing that many under-16s continue to access platforms. The UK is preparing to implement a similar ban for under-16s in spring of next year, which will offer another test case for how such restrictions work in practice. The EU Kids Act still requires approval from member states and the European Parliament, and tech companies are expected to mount significant opposition during the debate. The Commission's survey data showed that 92 percent of EU respondents consider strengthening children's online protection a top policy priority, but translating public support into enforceable rules that actually change behavior has proven far more complicated than the numbers suggest.

Too many children are being exposed too early to an online world they are not ready to navigate—an environment where bullying can follow you home, where every mistake can be recorded forever.
— Ursula von der Leyen, EU Commission President
For every person under 18, platforms must follow the principle of safety by design, with no toxic or addictive features, no traps.
— Ursula von der Leyen, EU Commission President
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su BBC News ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti