Across England and Wales, the machinery of justice is being quietly reshaped around those it has most often failed. The government's announcement of specialist rape courts — with private entrances, video testimony, trauma-trained staff, and fixed trial dates — is an acknowledgment that the courtroom itself can be a site of harm, not only of reckoning. Catalysed by Labour MP Charlotte Nichols, who named herself and her 1,088-day wait in Parliament, the £23 million reform arrives against a backdrop of record backlogs and a prosecution system that has driven many victims to withdraw before their
England and Wales to establish specialist rape courts with victim protections
I couldn't let this hurt me further.
So the government is building new courtrooms. What's actually different about them?
They're designed so victims don't have to sit in the same room as the person accused. You can give evidence by video from a separate room, watch the trial remotely. There are private entrances, separate waiting areas. Staff get trauma training. One person assigned to guide you through the whole process.
That's the physical setup. But the real bottleneck is case backlogs and how long trials take to happen. Does this speed anything up?
They're moving to fixed trial dates instead of floating lists. That's supposed to help. And there's £23 million being spent.
What prompted all this?
A Labour MP named Charlotte Nichols went public about being raped. She waited 1,088 days for trial. Three years. She spoke in Parliament about it, waived her anonymity, said the system had failed her.
And her case—did it result in conviction?
No. The person accused was acquitted in criminal court. But she won a civil case against him and got compensation.
So even with a trial, the outcome wasn't what she sought in the criminal system.
Right. And that's part of why she's pushing for reform. She's saying the whole thing is broken—not just the courtrooms, but how long it takes, how many people drop out.
The article mentions victims withdrawing cases because of delays. How common is that?
Common enough that the opposition called it a disgrace. One woman the BBC spoke to reported an assault in 2022, gave evidence in 2023, the case got adjourned when the judge got sick, and by 2024 she just couldn't do it anymore. Dropped it.
And then what happened to her case?
Prosecution dropped it. No testimony, no evidence. The accused faced no consequences in criminal court.
That's the human cost of delay. People give up. The system loses cases.
So these specialist courts—they're necessary but not sufficient?
They address the courtroom environment. They don't fix how long cases take to get there.
Le Pouls
- A Labour MP's decision to waive her anonymity and describe three years of waiting for a trial that ended in acquittal gave human urgency to what advocates had long documented in data.
- Victims have been withdrawing cases in significant numbers — not because they changed their minds, but because the system's delays wore them down past the point of endurance.
- Each crown court will now designate specialist courtrooms with private entrances, separate waiting areas, and video link options so victims need never share a physical space with their accused.
- Fixed trial dates will replace floating lists that could be postponed indefinitely, a structural change aimed at preventing the open-ended waiting that has caused the most documented harm.
- Rape Crisis England and Wales welcomed the announcement as a meaningful step, while cautioning that courts being made fit for purpose is only one part of a much larger reckoning.
Across England and Wales, the machinery of justice is being quietly reshaped around those it has most often failed. The government's announcement of specialist rape courts — with private entrances, video testimony, trauma-trained staff, and fixed trial dates — is an acknowledgment that the courtroom itself can be a site of harm, not only of reckoning. Catalysed by Labour MP Charlotte Nichols, who named herself and her 1,088-day wait in Parliament, the £23 million reform arrives against a backdrop of record backlogs and a prosecution system that has driven many victims to withdraw before their cases could be heard.
The prime minister announced this week that England and Wales will establish specialist courts for rape and sexual assault cases over the next two years. Each crown court will designate at least one courtroom for these cases, with victims able to give and observe evidence via video link, avoiding any shared space with the accused. Where buildings allow, private entrances and waiting areas will keep victims separate from defendants throughout. The government has committed roughly £23 million to the changes.
The reforms owe much of their political momentum to Charlotte Nichols, a Labour MP who waived her anonymity in March to describe her own rape and the 1,088 days she spent waiting for trial — more than three years she described as agony. Her attacker was acquitted in criminal court, though she later won a civil case against him. When she spoke in Parliament, she was responding to proposals to restrict jury trials, which she saw as yet another blow to victims already failed by a system moving with glacial slowness. Her willingness to name herself transformed long-documented advocacy into political weight.
Court staff will receive trauma-informed training, and each survivor will be assigned a single point of contact. From next month, rape trials will be given fixed dates rather than placed on floating lists subject to indefinite postponement. Prime Minister Andy Burnham acknowledged that prosecution rates for rape remain low and that prevention must accompany these procedural reforms.
The human cost of the existing system is not abstract. One woman told the BBC she had reported an alleged assault in early 2022, gave evidence in late 2023, and then watched her case adjourn when the judge fell ill. By the time it was scheduled to resume in September 2024, she had decided she could not endure further waiting. Without her testimony, the Crown Prosecution Service dropped the case. Her story is not unusual — victim withdrawal driven by delay has become common enough to draw condemnation across party lines.
These courts are not a solution to the underlying backlog, nor a guarantee that cases will move faster through the system. But they represent a recognition that if a victim does reach court, the court itself should not become another source of harm. Whether fixed trial dates will genuinely accelerate justice, or simply redistribute the waiting, remains the real test of the reform's ambition.
The prime minister announced this week that England and Wales will establish specialist courts dedicated to rape and sexual assault cases over the next two years, a move that brings together a cluster of protections designed to shield victims from the machinery of the courtroom itself. Each crown court will designate at least one courtroom for these cases. Victims will be able to watch proceedings from a separate room via video link and give their evidence the same way, avoiding the need to sit in the same space as the person accused. Where building layout permits, they will have private entrances and waiting areas kept distinct from those used by defendants. The government has budgeted roughly £23 million for these changes.
The reforms emerged directly from the public testimony of Charlotte Nichols, a Labour MP who waived her anonymity in March to describe her own rape and the grinding wait that followed. She spent 1,088 days waiting to go to trial—more than three years of what she called agony, each day compounded by the knowledge that her attacker would eventually be acquitted in criminal court, though she later won a civil case against him and secured compensation. When she spoke in Parliament, she was responding to government proposals to restrict jury trials, which she saw as another blow to victims already failed by a system that moved with glacial slowness. Her willingness to name herself and her experience gave political weight to what had long been documented by victim advocates: the system was breaking people.
Court staff handling these cases will receive trauma-informed training, and each survivor will be assigned a single point of contact to navigate the process. From next month, rape trials will be assigned fixed dates rather than placed on floating lists that could be postponed indefinitely. Prime Minister Andy Burnham framed the changes as an effort to rebalance justice toward victims, acknowledging that prosecution rates for rape remain low and that many victims wait years for their day in court. "For too long, victims of rape and serious sexual offences have felt let down by our justice system," he said, adding that the reforms alone would not be enough—prevention work must accompany prosecution.
Rape Crisis England and Wales, which had been calling for many of these measures for years, called the announcement a significant step forward. The charity's chief executive, Ciara Bergman, said the changes reflected an urgent need to make courts fit for purpose and responsive to what victims actually need to participate in justice. The government also announced earlier this year that rape victims would have access to specialist legal advice throughout the criminal justice process, a separate but complementary reform.
The backdrop to these announcements is a system under visible strain. Last year, the Salford Survivor Project documented how victims of rape and sexual assault were being failed by record court backlogs, with long delays taking a documented toll on mental health. One woman told the BBC that she had dropped her case after reporting an alleged sexual assault in early 2022. She gave evidence in court in December 2023, but the case was adjourned when the judge fell ill. By September 2024, when it was scheduled to resume, she had decided she could not endure further waiting. "I couldn't let this hurt me further," she said. Without her testimony, the Crown Prosecution Service had no choice but to drop the case for lack of evidence. Her withdrawal was not unusual—victims withdrawing cases because of delays has become common enough that the opposition Conservative Party cited it as a disgrace, though they used the moment to push back against Labour's separate proposal to restrict jury trials in some cases.
The specialist courts represent a recognition that the physical and procedural environment of a trial can either compound or mitigate the harm already done. They are not a solution to the underlying problem of case backlogs or the time it takes to bring a prosecution to trial. But they are an acknowledgment that if a victim does make it to court, the court itself should not be another site of trauma. Labour promised in its 2024 manifesto to halve violence against women and girls within a decade. These courts are one piece of that commitment, though the real test will be whether the fixed trial dates actually accelerate cases through the system, or whether they simply create a new kind of delay.
Citations marquantes
For too long, victims of rape and serious sexual offences have felt let down by our justice system. Prosecution rates for rape remain shamefully low, with many victims waiting years for justice.— Prime Minister Andy Burnham
It is because I have been raped that I am as passionate as I am about what it means for a justice system to be truly victim-focused.— Charlotte Nichols, Labour MP