Energy Drink, Castor Oil and Squishy Toy: Three Unexpected Anaphylaxis Triggers in Young Patients

A 15-year-old boy, an 10-year-old girl, and an 11-year-old girl each experienced anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine and emergency care, and the girl in the toy case had repeat ER visits.
A person can test negative and still react.
Dr. Annabelle Rowland on why standard fish allergy tests can miss a reaction to fish collagen.
Mark

Three kids, three odd triggers. What ties them together?

Mimi

Each one had anaphylaxis, each needed epinephrine, and in each the cause wasn't obvious at first. The boy's drink hid cod collagen on the label, the girl's hair oil differed by how it was pressed, and the toy's contents aren't disclosed.

Mark

The boy tested negative for fish, though. How does that work?

Mimi

Per Dr. Rowland, standard fish tests mostly target a different protein and contain very little collagen. So a negative result doesn't rule out a reaction to collagen.

Luke

Careful, though. That's the author's explanation. The report says his tests were negative and the drink contained cod collagen, but I'd want to know whether collagen itself was ever directly tested.

Mark

Fair. And the castor oil case?

Mimi

Heat-pressed oil was fine for years; cold-pressed caused hives and wheezing. Her skin prick tests matched that. The team thinks eczema-damaged skin let her become sensitized.

Luke

Note the wording: "we believe." The sensitization route is a hypothesis. What's solid is the positive test for the cold-pressed oil and negative for the heat-pressed.

Mark

And the squishy toy?

Mimi

Two reactions a week apart, with latex sensitization on blood testing. The doctors raise latex contamination or cross-reactivity as a question.

Luke

Exactly, a question. The toy's composition isn't known, and no other trigger was found. That's suggestive, not proven. Also, these are single case reports, so they can't tell us how common any of this is.

Mark

So what should a parent take from it?

Mimi

If a severe reaction is unexplained, look at what the child touched or consumed, including toys, and see an allergist.

  • A teenager's throat closed and his skin erupted within minutes of an energy drink, and he needed two doses of epinephrine before the crisis eased.
  • Standard fish allergy tests came back negative, yet the cod collagen hidden in the label was enough to set off the reaction.
  • A 10-year-old's scalp and face flared after cold-pressed castor oil, a product she had used safely for years in its heat-refined form.
  • An 11-year-old girl's throat tightened twice, once at home and again at school, forcing repeat trips to the emergency room.
  • Blood tests revealed latex sensitization in the girl with the squishy toy, pointing allergists toward hidden materials and unlisted additives.

Anaphylaxis is usually imagined as the peanut or the bee sting, the familiar enemies that everyone learns to fear. Yet three children presented to American allergists this year, each undone by something quieter: a line of collagen in a drink, a pressing method for an old household oil, a squeezable toy meant to soothe. Their stories suggest that the body's alarm can be tripped by the unexpected corners of modern life, and that the careful reader of a label, and the careful clinician, must sometimes look past the list of usual suspects.

Within minutes of sipping a new energy drink, a 15-year-old boy broke out in hives and began to wheeze. In the emergency department he needed two doses of epinephrine, along with other treatments, before his breathing eased. His case was one of three unrelated pediatric anaphylaxis reports presented at the 2026 ACAAI Annual Scientific Meeting, each involving a source far outside the familiar list of peanuts, shellfish and bee stings.

The culprit was printed on the label: 5 grams of cod-derived collagen. The boy had eczema, asthma and allergic rhinitis, and he had reacted to canned tuna before. Yet his skin tests for fish came back negative. Allergist Annabelle Rowland, MD, explained that standard tests look for different proteins and contain very little collagen, so a negative result does not guarantee safety, and fish collagen is turning up in more and more products.

A 10-year-old girl with scalp and elbow eczema had a different shock. For years she had used heat-pressed castor oil in her hair without trouble. Then cold-pressed oil touched her scalp, and hives and wheezing followed. Lead author Keyun Wang, DO, believes that years of applying oil to damaged skin may have primed her immune system, and that cold pressing preserves castor proteins that heat refining destroys. The lesson, he said, is that how an oil is processed matters as much as its plant of origin.

An 11-year-old girl with asthma and allergic rhinitis developed hives and a tight throat after handling a squishy toy and touching her face. Epinephrine in the ambulance helped, but her breathing worsened again in the hospital. A week later, a different squishy toy at school brought the same tightness within an hour. Blood testing showed latex sensitization, and no other cause could be found. Megan Marte, MD, noted that these toys are often marketed as non-toxic rubber yet may hide undisclosed chemical additives. Her advice is simple: when a child has an unexplained severe reaction, examine the objects involved and consult an allergist.

Within minutes of trying a new energy drink, a 15-year-old boy broke out in widespread hives, began wheezing and struggled to breathe. In the emergency department he needed two doses of epinephrine, plus albuterol, an antihistamine and IV fluids, before his symptoms settled. It is one of three unrelated pediatric cases presented at the 2026 Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI), each involving a child or teenager with anaphylaxis from a source well outside the usual list of peanuts, shellfish and bee stings.

The boy's trigger turned up on the drink's label: 5 grams of collagen derived from cod. He has eczema, asthma and allergic rhinitis, and had previously noticed mild throat itching and lip swelling after eating canned tuna, though he had eaten salmon without trouble. Skin prick tests for tuna, cod and flounder all came back negative. Allergist Annabelle Rowland, MD, who authored the report, explained that standard fish allergy tests mostly look for a different fish protein and contain very little collagen, so a person can test negative and still react. She noted that fish collagen is appearing in a growing number of products, from drinks to supplements.

The second case involved castor oil, a common ingredient in cosmetics, hair products and laxatives. Allergy to the castor bean is well known, but it almost always appears as a workplace allergy from inhaling bean dust, and anaphylaxis from the oil is rare, usually reported only in adults exposed to the seed. This report describes what the authors say is the first anaphylaxis in a child from castor oil applied to the skin.

The patient was a 10-year-old girl with eczema on her scalp, neck and elbows. For years she had used heat-pressed castor oil on her hair without problems. The first time cold-pressed castor oil was applied to her scalp, hives appeared on her face and neck, and she developed wheezing and shortness of breath. She was treated in the emergency room with epinephrine, albuterol and steroids. Skin prick tests using her own products were positive for the cold-pressed oil and negative for the heat-pressed one.

Lead author Keyun Wang, DO, said cold pressing keeps certain castor bean proteins intact, while the heat used in refining breaks them down. The team believes years of applying oil to eczema-damaged skin may have sensitized the girl, and that the protein-rich cold-pressed oil then provoked the reaction. Wang's takeaway: when assessing allergy risk from plant oils, how the oil is processed matters, not just which plant it comes from.

The third case involved a squishy squeeze ball, the kind some children use for stress relief and sensory play. Choking and skin irritation are known risks, but anaphylaxis had not been reported until now. An 11-year-old girl with allergic rhinitis and asthma developed hives, swelling and throat tightness after handling one at home and touching her face. She received epinephrine in the ambulance, then had a rebound of breathing symptoms that required more treatment in the emergency department.

A week later, within an hour of using a different squishy toy at school, she felt her throat tighten again. She used her own epinephrine and went back to the ER. She had no history of anaphylaxis, food allergy or latex allergy, but blood testing showed she was sensitized to latex, and no other trigger was found.

Lead author Megan Marte, MD, pointed out that these toys are often marketed as non-toxic rubber yet can contain a long list of chemical additives, and their exact makeup usually is not disclosed. Toy-related anaphylaxis has been linked to latex in ball pit materials, which raises the possibility of latex contamination or cross-reactivity in squishy toys. Her advice: if a child has an unexplained severe reaction after playing with a toy, look at the toys involved and consider seeing an allergist.

Taken together, the cases suggest that when a child's anaphylaxis has no obvious cause, clinicians may need to look at unlisted or hidden ingredients, how a product was processed, and latex sensitization. Anyone with symptoms of a severe allergic reaction should seek emergency care.

Standard fish allergy tests mostly look for a different fish protein and contain very little collagen, so a person can test negative and still react.
— Annabelle Rowland, MD, allergist and study author
When evaluating allergy risk from plant oils, we must consider how the oil is processed, not just the plant source.
— Keyun Wang, DO, lead author
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur News-Medical ↗
Nous contacter FAQ