In the weeks following a rapper's pro-Palestinian remarks at a New Jersey stadium, the machinery of a major pop tour fractured along a fault line that has quietly run beneath the music industry for years: who holds the right to speak, and at what cost. When billionaire venue owner Robert Kraft moved to bar Macklemore from performing, and promoters followed, Ed Sheeran found himself caught between the logic of diplomacy and the demand for solidarity — and his support acts, one by one, chose the latter. The episode asks an old question in a new arena: whether silence, however well-intentioned, c
Ed Sheeran tour support acts quit over Macklemore's Gaza remarks removal
There is no neutral position between the oppressor and the oppressed.
Mark
So Sheeran said he didn't make the decision to drop Macklemore. Who actually did?
Mimi
The promoter, Messina Touring Group, made the formal call. But Robert Kraft, who owns Gillette Stadium, is the one who set the dominoes falling. He told venues Macklemore wouldn't perform there, and they passed that pressure back to the promoter.
Luke
Right, but we should be precise about what Kraft actually said versus what's being inferred. He said his venue wouldn't provide a platform for what he called hate speech. He didn't explicitly say he coordinated with other venues—the promoter told Rolling Stone that venues informed them of the restriction, which would have killed the tour.
Mark
And Sheeran's position was that he wanted to stay neutral, keep things diplomatic. Why did that anger people so much?
Mimi
Because the support acts saw it as complicity. If you're not taking a side on something this visible, you're effectively siding with the status quo. Finneas put it simply: artists shouldn't be silenced.
Luke
Though we should note Sheeran did say he has personal views on the conflict and supports causes privately. He's making an argument about platform and audience, not saying he doesn't care. Whether that argument holds is what people disagreed on.
Mark
Macklemore only did two shows before being dropped. Did he know what would happen when he went on stage?
Mimi
He said afterward that if his words turned the conversation back to Palestine, it was the most successful tour he'd ever done. That sounds like someone who knew the cost and accepted it.
Luke
We don't actually know if he anticipated this specific outcome or just knew there'd be pushback. But yes, he clearly went in eyes open.
Mark
What's the actual dispute about what he said? Was it antisemitic?
Mimi
That's where it splits. Macklemore said criticism of Israel isn't criticism of Jewish people. He addressed Jewish audience members directly the next night to make that distinction. Kraft and others said his remarks were hate speech. Those are two different claims about the same words.
Luke
And the factual record: Macklemore performed a song about Gaza, showed footage of destruction, called for a free Palestine. Those are the concrete things. Whether that constitutes hate speech or legitimate political speech—that's the argument people are having.
Le Pouls
- Macklemore's declaration of 'Free Palestine' from a MetLife Stadium stage ignited an immediate campaign by advocacy groups and a billionaire venue owner to have him removed from the tour entirely.
- Robert Kraft's threat to bar Macklemore from Gillette Stadium gave promoters a structural ultimatum — drop the rapper or cancel shows for hundreds of thousands of ticketholders.
- Ed Sheeran publicly distanced himself from the removal, framing his platform as a space of safety and diplomacy, but his statement satisfied almost no one on either side of the dispute.
- Finneas, Lukas Graham, Aaron Rowe, and Beoga each withdrew in rapid succession, turning a corporate venue decision into a visible act of collective artistic conscience.
- Macklemore reframed his removal as a kind of victory, arguing that even two completed shows had returned global attention to Gaza — and that neutrality between oppressor and oppressed is itself a position.
In the weeks following a rapper's pro-Palestinian remarks at a New Jersey stadium, the machinery of a major pop tour fractured along a fault line that has quietly run beneath the music industry for years: who holds the right to speak, and at what cost. When billionaire venue owner Robert Kraft moved to bar Macklemore from performing, and promoters followed, Ed Sheeran found himself caught between the logic of diplomacy and the demand for solidarity — and his support acts, one by one, chose the latter. The episode asks an old question in a new arena: whether silence, however well-intentioned, can remain a neutral act when suffering is the subject.
On a Tuesday in September, Ed Sheeran posted to Instagram to clarify one thing: he had not removed Macklemore from his US tour. The decision, he said, belonged to the promoters. Within hours, nearly every remaining support act announced they were leaving anyway.
The sequence had begun on September 4th, when Macklemore performed at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, told the crowd he wanted to say two words — 'Free Palestine' — and performed his song Hind's Hall while footage of destruction in Gaza played behind him. The following night, he returned to the same stage and addressed Jewish audience members directly, drawing a distinction between criticism of Israeli policy and antisemitism.
The backlash was swift. The Israeli American Council launched a removal petition. StopAntisemitism accused him of ambushing fans with propaganda — a framing that pop star Pink amplified. Then Robert Kraft, the billionaire owner of Gillette Stadium and a man who had once hired Sheeran to perform at his wedding, declared his venue would not host Macklemore. Promoters told Rolling Stone that venues had made clear the rapper would not be allowed to perform, which would have forced cancellation of the entire tour.
Sheeran's statement tried to hold multiple things at once. He expressed horror at the conflict, acknowledged suffering on both sides, and explained that his platform — filled with children and families of all backgrounds — was not a political forum. He said he respected Macklemore's conviction while believing there were other ways to advocate for peace. It was not enough.
Finneas departed with a single sentence about artists not being silenced when they speak for the oppressed. Lukas Graham said people should be able to speak about children being killed regardless of which flag flies over them, and addressed Kraft directly: 'Money doesn't give you the right to own the conversation.' Aaron Rowe said he had not decided lightly. Beoga, the Irish folk band that had played with Sheeran every night, said that while those crowds were the stuff of dreams, they could not perform in venues that silenced advocates for a free Palestine.
Macklemore, in his own statement, acknowledged the difficult position Sheeran occupied but rejected the logic of neutrality. 'There is no neutral position between the oppressor and the oppressed,' he wrote. He listed what his stance had cost him — money, deals, relationships — and then reframed his two completed shows as a success if they had turned the conversation back to Gaza.
What the episode made visible was a tension that large-scale touring had long managed to keep offstage: the collision between the economics of access and the ethics of speech. Sheeran's case for diplomatic silence met the argument that some moments make silence its own statement — and his support acts, in leaving, suggested they had decided which cost was higher.
Ed Sheeran took to Instagram on a Tuesday to clarify what he had not done: he had not removed Macklemore from his US tour. The decision, he insisted, belonged to the promoters. Within hours, nearly every remaining support act on the line-up announced they were leaving anyway.
Macklemore, the rapper whose real name is Benjamin Haggerty, had performed at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey on September 4th. During his set, he told the crowd he wanted to stand in stadiums and say two words: "Free Palestine." He then performed his song Hind's Hall, which addresses pro-Palestinian protesters at Columbia University and criticizes Israel's military actions in Gaza, while footage of destruction in the territory played on the screen behind him. The next night, he returned to the same stage and spoke directly to Jewish audience members, distinguishing between criticism of Israeli policy and antisemitism.
The backlash came swiftly. The Israeli American Council launched a petition demanding his removal. StopAntisemitism, a campaign group, accused him of ambushing fans with propaganda—a characterization the pop star Pink amplified by reposting it. Within days, Robert Kraft, the billionaire owner of Gillette Stadium in Massachusetts, made clear his venue would not host Macklemore, calling his remarks hate speech and citing what he described as a broader pattern of antisemitic rhetoric. Kraft had once hired Sheeran to perform at his wedding. The tour promoter, Messina Touring Group, told Rolling Stone that venues had informed them Macklemore would not be allowed to perform, which would have forced cancellation of the entire tour and affected hundreds of thousands of fans.
Sheeran's statement attempted to thread a needle. He said he was "appalled by the conflict between Israel and Palestine" and acknowledged the suffering on both sides as a human tragedy. He explained that he chose not to use his professional platform for politics because his audience included young people and children of all backgrounds who did not come expecting a political forum. He said he respected Macklemore's conviction but believed there were multiple approaches to advocating for peace. "I choose to use my fame and platform to be a place of safety and sanctuary, to maintain diplomacy and keep conversations open, not closed," he wrote. He also noted that Macklemore, like all support acts, had been free to choose his own setlist.
The statement did not hold. Finneas, the producer and brother of Billie Eilish, announced his departure with a single sentence: "Artists must not be silenced when they speak up for the oppressed." Lukas Graham, the Danish band, said people should be able to speak about war and children being killed regardless of geography or flag. Aaron Rowe, an Irish singer-songwriter who had opened shows on the Australian leg earlier in the year and rejoined for the US dates in June, said he had not taken the decision lightly but could not continue. Beoga, an Irish folk band that performed with Sheeran every night, posted that while playing to those crowds was the stuff of dreams, they could not perform in venues that silenced anyone advocating for a free Palestine.
Lukas Graham directly addressed Kraft's role: "Money doesn't give you the right to own the conversation. Nobody's bank balance should decide who gets to speak or which suffering we're allowed to acknowledge." Macklemore himself, in a statement after being dropped, acknowledged the difficult position Sheeran faced but criticized him for neutrality. "There is no neutral position between the oppressor and the oppressed," Macklemore wrote. He said he had lost money, brand deals, sponsorships, and relationships over his stance. But he also reframed his brief time on the tour—only two completed shows—as a success if it turned the conversation back to Palestine.
The incident exposed a fault line in how artists navigate political expression within the machinery of large-scale touring. Sheeran's argument for diplomatic silence and open conversation collided with the position that some moments demand a clear stance, regardless of cost. The withdrawal of his support acts suggested that for many musicians, the cost of silence had become higher than the cost of speaking.
Citations marquantes
Artists must not be silenced when they speak up for the oppressed.— Finneas
Money doesn't give you the right to own the conversation. Nobody's bank balance should decide who gets to speak or which suffering we're allowed to acknowledge.— Lukas Graham
I choose to use my fame and platform to be a place of safety and sanctuary, to maintain diplomacy and keep conversations open, not closed.— Ed Sheeran
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur BBC News ↗
War & Conflict