Earl Spencer draws parallels between Diana's media treatment and Sussexes' scrutiny

Princess Diana experienced severe emotional distress from media coverage, described by her brother as causing 'tears of despair' and being 'really brought low' by criticism.
A cancerous influence in their life, really and truly.
Spencer describing the impact of relentless media scrutiny on anyone subjected to it, drawing from his observation of Diana's suffering.
Mark

When Spencer says the media coverage of Harry and Meghan echoes what happened to Diana, what exactly is he pointing to? Is it the volume of coverage, the tone, or something else?

Mimi

It sounds like all of it—the relentlessness, the capacity to wound, the way tabloids can turn someone into a target. He's saying the mechanism is the same. Diana was sensitive to criticism, and it broke her down. He watched that happen. Now he's seeing the same machinery at work.

Luke

But we should be careful here. Spencer is making a comparison based on his own memory and observation. He's not providing evidence that the current coverage of the Sussexes is equivalent in scale or impact. Diana was pursued by paparazzi in ways that were genuinely dangerous. The Sussexes have legal remedies and platforms the press can't control. They're not the same situation.

Mark

Fair point. So when he says he's "on his deceased sister's sons' side," is he actually saying he supports Harry's position against the Royal Family?

Mimi

He's being careful not to say that directly. He's saying he loves both his nephews equally and would help either of them. But the context matters—he's just made a public statement that King Charles said something deeply unkind after Diana's death. That's not neutral.

Luke

Right, and that's the thing we can't verify independently. Spencer says he told people at the time, but we don't have those contemporaneous accounts. We have his memory of a phone call from 1997. The Palace disputes it. Both sides are claiming truth, and we're left with a he-said-he-said.

Mark

His book is coming out next week. Is this interview essentially the promotional run?

Mimi

Almost certainly. He's laying out his key claims publicly before the book drops—the King's "soon enough" comment, the "giddily elated" tone. He's establishing his credibility as a truth-teller.

Luke

Which is smart strategy, but it also means we should read his statements in that context. He has a book to sell and a narrative to establish. That doesn't make him dishonest, but it does mean his timing and emphasis are shaped by commercial and personal interests.

  • Spencer speaks with the urgency of a man who watched his sister be 'really brought low' and fears the same machinery is now turning on her son and daughter-in-law.
  • The Sussexes' own legal battles — including a devastating £34.5 million potential bill after losing a privacy case against the Daily Mail — underscore that the conflict with the British press is not merely emotional but financially and legally brutal.
  • A separate firestorm erupted when Spencer claimed King Charles told him, days after Diana's death, that people would forget her 'soon enough' — a charge the Palace pushed back on with pointed language about grief clouding memory.
  • Spencer held firm, insisting he was 'hyper alert' in that moment and had immediately told family and friends because the remark seemed 'so monstrous,' framing the Palace's response as a deliberate smudging of the truth.
  • His forthcoming memoir Swan Song is poised to escalate the reckoning further, with early extracts already describing Charles as sounding like a 'lottery winner' in that same call — a portrait of royal indifference that Spencer appears fully prepared to defend.

Nearly three decades after Diana's death, her brother Earl Spencer has returned to a familiar grief — watching, from Althorp, as the patterns that diminished his sister appear to repeat themselves around Prince Harry and Meghan. In a BBC interview, Spencer named the press not merely as intrusive but as a 'cancerous influence,' drawing a line of continuity between Diana's tears of despair and the sustained scrutiny the Sussexes face today. His words arrive ahead of a memoir that promises to reopen wounds the Palace would prefer remain closed, reminding a watching public that history, when unexamined, tends to rhyme.

At his Althorp estate, Earl Spencer sat with the BBC and drew an unsparing parallel: the tabloid treatment that wore down his sister Diana is, in his view, the same force now bearing down on Prince Harry and Meghan. He did not hedge. Press coverage of either Diana or the Sussexes could be 'really, really unpleasant,' he said, and he believed Diana's experience should serve as a cautionary tale for anyone being 'destroyed in this way daily.'

His memory of Diana under that pressure was vivid and painful — a woman he saw in 'tears of despair,' deeply sensitive to criticism, brought low by relentless scrutiny until her death in Paris in August 1997. At her funeral, Spencer had accused the media of a 'permanent quest' to diminish her. Now, nearly thirty years on, he saw the same dynamics surrounding his nephew and his wife.

Spencer was careful to clarify his position. He was not, he said, simply 'on Harry's side.' He was on the side of both of Diana's sons — equally, and unconditionally. The Sussexes had returned to the UK weeks before the interview, six years after stepping back from royal duties, their relationship with the British press still defined by sustained conflict. Harry had called the tabloid environment 'toxic'; Meghan had said the media would find a way to destroy her regardless of her conduct. The legal record bore that out — victories against the Mirror Group and News Group, but also a bruising loss against the Daily Mail's publisher that left Harry facing a potential bill of up to £34.5 million.

A separate controversy shadowed the interview. Spencer had claimed that King Charles, calling him days after Diana's death, said people would forget her 'soon enough.' The Palace responded by suggesting that fraternal grief can distort memory. Spencer rejected this firmly. He had received only two calls from Charles in his entire life and had been 'hyper alert' to every word. He had told family and friends immediately because the remark seemed 'so monstrous.' The Palace's reply, he said, had simply 'smudged' the matter. 'I'm telling the truth,' he concluded.

His memoir, Swan Song: Diana, My Sister, was due the following week. Early extracts described Charles as sounding 'giddily elated' in that same call — like a 'lottery winner.' Spencer gave every indication he was prepared to defend each claim, publicly and without retreat.

Earl Spencer sat down with the BBC at his Althorp estate and drew a direct line between the media treatment his sister Diana endured and what Prince Harry and Meghan now face. The parallels, he said, were unmistakable and troubling. When asked whether Diana would recognize herself in the scrutiny surrounding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Spencer didn't hedge. Tabloid articles about either Diana or the couple could be "really, really unpleasant," he said, and he believed people ought to study what happened to his sister as a cautionary tale. For anyone being "destroyed in this way daily," the press becomes "such a cancerous influence in their life."

Spencer's memory of Diana under that weight was vivid and painful. He recalled seeing her in "tears of despair," describing her as deeply sensitive to criticism. The relentless coverage had "really brought low" a woman who married the then-Prince Charles in 1981 and remained a subject of intense press interest until her death in a Paris car crash on August 31, 1997. At her funeral, Spencer had delivered a eulogy accusing the media of conducting a "permanent quest" to diminish her, threatened by what he called her "genuine goodness." Now, nearly three decades later, he was watching similar dynamics unfold with his nephew and his wife.

Spencer was careful to say he wasn't speaking for Harry and Meghan themselves, but he wanted to be clear about his own position. Some people believed he was "on Harry's side," he said, but that wasn't quite right. "I'm on my deceased sister's sons' side, both of them," he explained, "and if either of them wanted anything, then I'd be equally there for them." The Sussexes had returned to the UK just weeks before this interview, six years after stepping back from royal duties. Their relationship with the British press had been contentious for years. In a 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey, Prince Harry had described the tabloid environment as "toxic," built on "control and fear." Meghan had said in a 2022 Netflix series that no matter her effort or conduct, the media "were still going to find a way to destroy me."

The legal battles had been costly. In July of that year, Prince Harry and six others, including Liz Hurley and Sir Elton John, lost a privacy case against the Daily Mail's publisher and faced a potential legal bill of up to £34.5 million. In earlier cases, Harry had won against the Mirror Group in court and forced a settlement and apology from News Group. The pattern was one of sustained conflict.

Spencer's interview came in the wake of a separate controversy. He had claimed that King Charles, in a phone call days after Diana's death, said people would forget her "soon enough." The Palace had responded with a strongly worded statement suggesting that "fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgement and colour memory." Spencer's reaction was sharp. He said he had received only two calls from Prince Charles in his entire life, and he had been "hyper alert" to what was said in that moment. "Those are precisely the words that he said," Spencer insisted, "and I promise that to you now. Genuinely, that is what he said." When pressed on evidence, he said he had told family and friends immediately because the remark seemed "so monstrous." The Palace's response, he suggested, had simply "smudged" the matter by saying recollections may vary. "I'm telling the truth," he concluded.

Spencer's forthcoming memoir, Swan Song: Diana, My Sister, was due to be published the following week and was expected to be sharply critical of the Royal Family. Early extracts had already surfaced claims that King Charles had "sounded giddily elated" when he called Spencer after Diana's death, sounding like a "lottery winner." The book promised to be a reckoning, and Spencer's public statements suggested he was prepared to defend every claim in it.

For anyone being destroyed in this way daily, the press becomes such a cancerous influence in their life.
— Earl Spencer
I'm on my deceased sister's sons' side, both of them, and if either of them wanted anything, then I'd be equally there for them.
— Earl Spencer
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur BBC News ↗
Nous contacter FAQ