Dr. Rasha Kelej on Breaking Infertility Stigma Through Multilayered Leadership

Women in communities faced social stigma, discrimination, and isolation due to infertility, often blamed for a condition beyond their control.
Lasting change rarely comes from solving only the problem you can see.
Dr. Kelej reflects on the leadership principle that guided her work transforming fertility care across Africa.
Mark

So the core insight here is that infertility isn't just a medical problem—it's a social one. But how does a foundation actually move from recognizing that to building it into their strategy?

Mimi

By going to the places where the problem lives. Kelej visited rural communities and saw directly how women were blamed, isolated, rejected. That wasn't abstract knowledge—it was witnessing the actual human cost. Once you see that, you can't unsee it. You realize that training more doctors doesn't fix the shame.

Luke

But I want to be careful here. The article says she "witnessed" stigma and "encountered" cultural resistance. Those are real observations, but the article doesn't give us numbers on how widespread the stigma actually is, or which specific communities had which specific barriers. We know the foundation trained 800 providers across 42 countries, which is concrete. But how much of the culture shift is measurable versus aspirational?

Mimi

That's fair. The article is more about the leadership philosophy than the outcomes data. But the 800 scholarships across 42 countries—that's not aspirational. That's what they did. And establishing the first local fertility specialists in countries that had none before—that's a real structural change.

Mark

So the media training piece—training journalists to report more accurately on fertility—that's part of breaking the stigma too. You're not just treating infertility; you're changing how people talk about it.

Mimi

Exactly. If the media is reinforcing misinformation or shame, then even if you build the clinics, people won't come. So you have to work on the narrative at the same time you're building capacity.

Luke

The article mentions engaging artists and creative communities to carry messages. That's interesting, but I don't see specifics about what those partnerships looked like or what impact they had. Is that something Kelej elaborates on elsewhere, or is it more of a principle she's stating?

Mimi

From what's here, it sounds like a principle she's articulating as part of her broader approach. The article is reflective—it's about how she thinks about leadership, not a detailed case study of each initiative.

Mark

But the core claim is that you have to work on all the layers at once. You can't just build medical capacity and expect the culture to follow.

Mimi

Right. And that's what distinguishes this approach from a more conventional development model. You're not exporting a solution; you're building local expertise, local trust, and local narrative change simultaneously.

Luke

One thing I'd want to know: in the 42 countries where they trained providers, did they see measurable increases in women seeking care? Did the stigma actually decrease? The article frames this as a successful approach, but I'm not seeing the evidence that it worked—only that it was attempted.

  • Women across rural communities bore the blame for infertility regardless of cause, facing isolation and social rejection for a condition entirely beyond their control.
  • Medical innovation alone proved insufficient — cultural resistance, religious skepticism, and circulating misinformation blocked access to care even where clinics existed.
  • The Merck Foundation responded on every front simultaneously: training doctors, shifting cultural narratives, educating journalists, engaging faith communities, and partnering with artists to carry messages where conventional health communication could not reach.
  • More than 800 scholarships across 42 countries created permanent local fertility expertise — specialists who understood not just the medicine but the cultural terrain in which they worked.
  • The initiative is now positioned as a model for any entrenched challenge: address the visible crisis and the invisible architecture of shame, resistance, and misinformation surrounding it at the same time.

In a reflection published through her virtual mentorship platform, Dr. Rasha Kelej of the Merck Foundation offers a quiet but consequential lesson: that the suffering most visible to the world is rarely the suffering most in need of naming. Her 'More Than a Mother' movement, built across Africa and beyond, grew from the recognition that infertility is not merely a medical condition but a social wound — one that isolates women, resists treatment through cultural fear, and persists through misinformation. What she built in response was not a single solution but a layered architecture of change, one that asks leaders everywhere to look past the obvious problem toward the many problems holding it in place.

Dr. Rasha Kelej, CEO of the Merck Foundation, has written about a leadership principle earned through direct experience: the most visible problem is rarely the only one. Her article, published as part of a virtual mentorship platform, traces the making of the 'More Than a Mother' movement — an initiative designed to transform how fertility care is delivered and understood across Africa and beyond.

Kelej's understanding of the problem's true shape came from traveling to rural communities and watching how infertility functioned as a source of profound social devastation. Women bore the blame regardless of cause, facing isolation and rejection for a condition beyond their control. Religious and cultural resistance to fertility treatment itself created barriers that no medical innovation alone could dissolve. These observations made clear that building clinics and training doctors, while necessary, would not be enough.

The foundation's response became deliberately layered. Where trained specialists were absent, it built medical capacity — more than 800 scholarships to healthcare providers across 42 countries, including the first local fertility specialists and embryologists in many of those nations. Where stigma kept people from seeking care, it worked to shift cultural perception. Where misinformation spread, it trained journalists to report more accurately. Where religious resistance existed, it engaged those communities with respect rather than routing around them. Where conventional communication fell short, it partnered with artists to carry messages in forms that would resonate.

Kelej frames this as the core lesson of the work: lasting change does not come from solving only the problem you can see. A leader must map the many layers surrounding the visible crisis — the social shame, the cultural resistance, the absence of trusted local voices — and work on all of them at once. The article positions this experience as instructive for anyone confronting entrenched disparities, with a consistent principle at its center: engage the communities most affected not as recipients of solutions, but as partners in defining what change actually looks like.

Dr. Rasha Kelej, CEO of the Merck Foundation, has written about a leadership principle she learned the hard way: the most visible problem is rarely the only problem. In a new article published as part of her virtual mentorship platform, she reflects on her work creating and directing the "More Than a Mother" movement, an initiative designed to transform how fertility care is delivered and understood across Africa and beyond. The article, titled "Leadership Beyond the Obvious: How I Worked to Transform Fertility Care and Break Infertility Stigma," traces how she came to see infertility not as a purely medical challenge but as a social, cultural, and communicative one—and how that shift in perspective changed what her organization actually did.

Kelej's understanding of the problem's true shape came from direct observation. She traveled to rural communities across Africa, watching how infertility functioned as a source of profound social devastation, particularly for women. In many places, women bore the blame for infertility regardless of its actual cause. They faced discrimination, isolation, and social rejection for a condition often entirely beyond their control. Kelej also encountered religious and cultural resistance to fertility treatment itself—barriers that no amount of medical innovation alone could overcome. These visits made clear that building clinics and training doctors, while necessary, would not be sufficient.

So the Merck Foundation's approach became deliberately layered. If there were no trained fertility specialists in a region, the foundation built medical capacity—providing more than 800 scholarships to healthcare providers from 42 countries, establishing local expertise where none had existed before. If stigma kept women and couples from seeking care, the foundation worked to shift cultural perception. If misinformation circulated through public narratives, the foundation trained journalists and media professionals to report more accurately. If religious or cultural beliefs created resistance, the foundation engaged those communities respectfully rather than around them. And when conventional health communication could not reach everyone, the foundation partnered with artists and creative communities to carry messages in forms that would resonate.

This multi-directional strategy reflects Kelej's core insight about leadership itself: lasting change does not come from solving only the problem you can see. A leader must identify the many layers surrounding the visible crisis and work on all of them simultaneously. In the case of infertility, that meant recognizing that the barrier was not just medical scarcity but also social shame, cultural resistance, misinformation, and the absence of trusted local voices willing to speak about the issue openly.

The scholarship program illustrates the scale of the capacity-building effort. Eight hundred healthcare providers trained across 42 countries represents a deliberate investment in creating permanent local expertise rather than importing solutions. In many of those countries, the foundation supported the training of the first local fertility specialists and embryologists—professionals who could serve their own communities and, crucially, who understood the cultural context in which they worked. This approach built not just medical capacity but also trust and cultural legitimacy.

Kelej's article positions this work as a case study in what she calls "leadership beyond the obvious." The obvious problem was infertility itself—a medical condition affecting millions. The obvious solution would have been to build clinics and train doctors. But the deeper work required understanding why women suffering from infertility often suffered alone, why communities resisted treatment, why misinformation persisted, and why local expertise mattered as much as foreign expertise. Addressing those layers simultaneously created what Kelej describes as a broader culture shift alongside the strengthening of access to care and healthcare capacity.

The article and the mentorship platform it belongs to suggest that Kelej sees this experience as instructive for leaders working on other entrenched problems—health disparities, gender inequality, cultural resistance to change. The principle is consistent: look beyond the immediate challenge. Understand the social, cultural, and communicative architecture surrounding it. Work on multiple layers at once. Build local capacity and local trust. Engage the communities most affected, not as recipients of solutions but as partners in defining what change actually looks like.

A leader must identify—and then work on—the many layers surrounding it. This is one of the most important leadership lessons I learned through creating the 'Merck Foundation More Than a Mother' movement.
— Dr. Rasha Kelej, CEO of Merck Foundation
Contattaci Domande frequenti