DOJ moves to dismiss Adams corruption charges amid prosecutor exodus

No system of ordered liberty can allow the Government to use the carrot of dismissing charges
Prosecutor Hagan Scotten explained his resignation by invoking the principle that prosecutorial power cannot be weaponized to influence elected officials.
Mark

So what exactly happened here? The Justice Department just decided to drop a corruption case?

Mimi

Not quite. They filed a motion asking the court to dismiss it. A judge still has to approve. But yes, the department leadership ordered it dropped, and that's what triggered the resignations.

Luke

Right—and we should be clear about the chain. Bove, who was Trump's lawyer, ordered the U.S. attorney in Manhattan to drop the case. She refused and quit. Then he suspended the prosecutors and told the public integrity section someone had to sign the motion or lose their job.

Mark

And seven people quit over this?

Mimi

Seven prosecutors across New York and Washington. Including the interim U.S. attorney herself, Danielle Sassoon. And Hagan Scotten, who actually worked on the Adams case.

Luke

Scotten's letter is the key document here. He's saying this isn't about the merits of the case—it's about whether the government can use the threat of prosecution as leverage to make an elected official cooperate with policy.

Mark

What was the original case about?

Mimi

Adams allegedly accepted over $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions and travel perks from foreign nationals who wanted influence. He was Brooklyn borough president at the time, running for mayor.

Luke

And the Justice Department's justification for dropping it?

Mimi

Bove said Adams is needed for immigration enforcement and crime reduction. He also said the charges were brought too close to the mayoral election.

Mark

Did Adams or his team offer anything in exchange for the dismissal?

Luke

That's contested. Sassoon's letter says Adams' lawyers offered what looked like a quid pro quo on immigration. Adams' lawyer says that's a lie—they were just asked if the case affected national security and answered honestly.

Mark

So we don't actually know if there was a deal.

Luke

Correct. We have Sassoon's account in her letter, and we have Adams' denial. What we do know is that Bove ordered the dismissal, prosecutors refused, and then people started resigning.

Mimi

And Scotten's point was broader than just this case. He was saying that using prosecutorial power this way—as a carrot or stick—violates the whole system.

Mark

What happens now?

Luke

A federal judge has to approve the dismissal. If they do, the case ends, though technically it could be brought again. If they don't, the case continues and the Justice Department will have to explain why it's asking to drop charges it brought.

  • Seven federal prosecutors, including a decorated Army veteran and Harvard Law graduate who once clerked for the Chief Justice, resigned rather than sign a motion they believed corrupted the integrity of the justice system.
  • Acting Deputy AG Emil Bove — who defended Donald Trump in criminal proceedings before joining the administration — threatened remaining prosecutors with job loss until one agreed to file the dismissal motion.
  • The charges at the center of the storm allege Mayor Adams accepted over $100,000 in illegal foreign contributions and luxury travel perks in exchange for political influence, yet the government now argues his cooperation on immigration makes prosecution inconvenient.
  • Prosecutors warn the dismissal-without-prejudice approach creates a chilling precedent: charges held in reserve as a sword over elected officials who might otherwise resist federal policy demands.
  • A federal judge must still approve the motion, leaving the case — and the constitutional questions it raises — suspended in an uneasy legal limbo.

In a moment that tests the boundaries between law and political will, the U.S. Justice Department has moved to dismiss corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams — a decision that prompted at least seven prosecutors to resign rather than carry it out. The directive, issued by a former Trump defense attorney now serving as Acting Deputy Attorney General, frames the dismissal as a matter of immigration enforcement necessity, while those who walked away argue it transforms the machinery of justice into a tool of political leverage. A federal judge has yet to approve the motion, leaving the question unresolved — but the deeper question, of whether criminal charges can be wielded as currency between government and the governed, may linger far longer than any verdict.

On Friday, the Justice Department formally asked a federal court to dismiss corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a move that had already torn through the department's ranks like a fault line. The filing came from Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove — a lawyer who represented Donald Trump in criminal proceedings before the election — along with officials from the public integrity and criminal divisions in Washington.

The days leading up to the filing were marked by extraordinary resistance. At least seven prosecutors resigned rather than comply with the order to drop the case. Among them was Danielle Sassoon, the interim U.S. attorney in Manhattan, who quit after Bove directed her to seek dismissal. Hagan Scotten, an assistant U.S. attorney who worked the Adams prosecution — an Army Special Forces veteran, Bronze Star recipient, and former clerk to Chief Justice John Roberts — also walked away. After the resignations, Bove suspended remaining prosecutors with pay and told them to decide among themselves who would sign the motion. When their jobs were put on the line, one agreed.

The charges against Adams alleged he accepted more than $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions and lavish travel perks from foreign nationals seeking to buy his influence, dating to his time as Brooklyn borough president. In his resignation letter, Scotten wrote that no system of ordered liberty could permit the government to use the threat of criminal charges — or their dismissal — to bend an elected official toward its policy goals. His final words to Bove were pointed: he predicted someone foolish or cowardly enough to file the motion would eventually be found, but made clear it would never be him.

Bove defended the dismissal by arguing Adams was essential to the Trump administration's immigration enforcement agenda and that the charges had been filed too close to this year's mayoral election. He added that the case could be reinstated after the race. Sassoon, in her own resignation letter, alleged that Adams' legal team had effectively offered a quid pro quo on immigration during a Washington meeting — an accusation Adams and his lawyer flatly denied. Adams issued a statement Friday insisting he had never traded his mayoral authority for relief from prosecution.

The motion seeks dismissal without prejudice, meaning charges could theoretically be revived. A federal judge must still approve the request. Adams, a Democrat who pleaded not guilty in September, has recently cultivated a visible rapport with Trump, who has criticized the prosecution and floated the possibility of a pardon. The case now waits in legal suspension — but the questions it has raised about prosecutorial independence and the uses of federal power are unlikely to wait quietly.

On Friday, the Justice Department filed paperwork asking a federal court to dismiss corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The motion came from Acting Deputy U.S. Attorney General Emil Bove and lawyers from the department's public integrity and criminal divisions in Washington. A judge will still need to approve the request.

The formal filing marked the culmination of days of extraordinary upheaval inside the Justice Department. At least seven prosecutors across New York and Washington resigned rather than comply with orders to drop the case. Among them was Danielle Sassoon, the interim U.S. attorney in Manhattan, who quit on Thursday after Bove directed her to seek dismissal. Also departing were five high-ranking Justice Department officials in Washington and Hagan Scotten, an assistant U.S. attorney who worked on the Adams prosecution. Scotten is an Army veteran who earned two Bronze medals as a Special Forces troop commander in Iraq and graduated from Harvard Law School in 2010, where he clerked for Chief Justice John Roberts.

Bove, who represented Donald Trump against criminal charges before Trump's reelection in November, had ordered the dismissal on Monday. When Sassoon refused and resigned, he responded with a scathing letter. He then suspended the prosecutors working on the Adams case with pay and launched an investigation into whether they should keep their jobs. On Friday, after conferring with prosecutors in the public integrity section, Bove instructed them to decide among themselves who would sign the motion to dismiss. When they were told their jobs were at risk if no one stepped forward, one agreed to do it.

The charges against Adams alleged he accepted over $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions and lavish travel perks from foreign nationals seeking to buy his influence while he was Brooklyn borough president and running for mayor. In his resignation letter, Scotten wrote that no system of ordered liberty could allow the government to use the dismissal of charges—or the threat of bringing them again—to induce an elected official to support its policy objectives. He said he was following a tradition of resigning in a last-ditch effort to prevent what he viewed as a serious mistake. "If no lawyer within earshot of the President is willing to give him that advice, then I expect you will eventually find someone who is enough of a fool, or enough of a coward, to file your motion," Scotten wrote to Bove. "But it was never going to be me."

Bove justified the dismissal by saying Adams was needed for the Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts and to help decrease violent crime. He also argued the charges were brought too close to this year's mayoral election and could be reinstated after the race. Sassoon, in her resignation letter, accused Adams' lawyers of offering what amounted to a quid pro quo on immigration during a meeting with Justice Department officials in Washington last month. Adams' lawyer Alex Spiro denied the allegation, calling it a "total lie." He said the team was asked whether the case had any bearing on national security and immigration enforcement and answered truthfully that it did. On Friday, Adams himself issued a statement: "I want to be crystal clear with New Yorkers: I never offered—nor did anyone offer on my behalf—any trade of my authority as your mayor for an end to my case. Never."

Chad Mizelle, the chief of staff to Attorney General Pam Bondi, defended the decision in a statement to Fox News, calling it evidence that the Justice Department would return to prosecuting dangerous criminals rather than pursuing what he characterized as politically motivated cases. He said prosecutors who refused to follow a direct command had no place at the department. Scotten, however, argued that any prosecutor would know that laws and traditions do not permit using prosecutorial power to influence citizens, much less elected officials. He acknowledged that a president with a background in business and politics might view the dismissal as a good deal, however distasteful. But he insisted that a lawyer should advise against it.

The Justice Department's motion sought to dismiss the case without prejudice, meaning charges could theoretically be revived in the future. A federal judge must still sign off on the request. Adams, a Democrat, pleaded not guilty to the charges in September. He has recently bonded at times with Trump, who has criticized the prosecution and said he was open to giving Adams a pardon. Adams was registered as a Republican in the 1990s.

No system of ordered liberty can allow the Government to use the carrot of dismissing charges, or the stick of threatening to bring them again, to induce an elected official to support its policy objectives.
— Prosecutor Hagan Scotten, in his resignation letter
I never offered—nor did anyone offer on my behalf—any trade of my authority as your mayor for an end to my case. Never.
— Mayor Eric Adams, in a statement
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei BradfordToday ↗
Kontakt FAQ