Every life is woven from the people who share its rooms, its work, and its family table, and some of those threads pull harder than others. A study from New York University and Indiana University, drawing on more than 2,000 people in Indiana, suggests that each regularly difficult person in someone's network travels alongside a slightly quicker pace of biological aging, measured in saliva DNA markers. The researchers are careful to say that this is a pattern of association rather than proof that friction wears the body down, and the question of what is cause and what is correlate remains open.
Difficult People in Your Life May Speed Up Biological Aging, New Study Suggests
Even small effects in terms of biological aging can accumulate.
So what's the headline finding here?
Each extra person who regularly hassles you was associated with a 1.5 percent faster pace of biological aging, measured through DNA changes in saliva.
That sounds small.
It is. Perry's point is that small effects accumulate, possibly leading to earlier chronic disease.
But does being around difficult people actually age you?
The authors say they don't know. Lee was clear it's an association, not proof of cause.
And the hassler count is self-reported, right?
Yes, participants answered survey questions about who hassled them, and rated their own health too. Whether that perception shapes the results is not something the reporting settles.
Who tends to report hasslers?
Women, people in poorer health, and those with adverse childhood experiences. Perry offers explanations, but she calls them theories.
And the advice about buffers?
Lee suggests supportive relationships might calm aging, but the researchers did not investigate that.
So the takeaway isn't to cut everyone off.
No. Umberson says all relationships have hassle, and isolation carries its own heavy toll.
Le Pouls
- A study of more than 2,000 people links each regular 'hassler' in a social network to a measurable quickening of biological aging.
- The effect is small, about 1.5 percent per difficult person, yet it can compound and may help bring on chronic disease sooner.
- Family members, co-workers and roommates are the most common sources of strain, precisely the ties that are hard to leave behind.
- Women and people in poorer health report more hasslers, raising questions about caregiving burdens and the stress of carrying others' problems.
- Researchers stress the findings show association, not causation, so the next step is untangling whether friction truly drives aging.
Every life is woven from the people who share its rooms, its work, and its family table, and some of those threads pull harder than others. A study from New York University and Indiana University, drawing on more than 2,000 people in Indiana, suggests that each regularly difficult person in someone's network travels alongside a slightly quicker pace of biological aging, measured in saliva DNA markers. The researchers are careful to say that this is a pattern of association rather than proof that friction wears the body down, and the question of what is cause and what is correlate remains open. For now the finding invites a quiet reckoning with the ordinary burdens we carry in close company.
Researchers at New York University and Indiana University have attempted to measure something many people sense but rarely quantify: what it costs to live with difficult people. Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, their study found that each additional "hassler," someone who regularly creates problems or makes life harder, was associated with a 1.5 percent faster pace of biological aging. The work was led by Byungkyu Lee of NYU, with Brea Perry of Indiana University, and it began from a well-established idea: strong social networks protect health, while not every tie is supportive.
The team surveyed more than 2,000 people in Indiana about their relationships over six months, asked how often each person caused them trouble, rated their own health, and collected saliva samples to read markers of biological aging. The arithmetic is modest, a year of aging stretching to about 1.015 years with one extra hassler, but Perry noted that small effects can accumulate over a lifetime. The association was strongest for people with two or more hasslers.
The authors are clear about what the data cannot show. "We do not know whether hasslers actually cause people to age," Lee said. Women reported more hasslers than men, as did people in poorer health and those with adverse childhood experiences. Many hasslers were family, often parents, children, co-workers, or roommates, people bound to us by obligation and shared space.
For those living with such people, the advice is nuanced. Cutting ties is often unrealistic, especially with family, so experts suggest limiting time together, considering therapy, setting limits on one's effort, and practicing self-care before and after hard encounters. Supportive relationships may act as a buffer, though the study did not test that. Debra Umberson reminded readers that connection still matters most, noting that loneliness was linked by the World Health Organization to 871,000 deaths a year.
Researchers at New York University and Indiana University have put a number on something most people feel without measuring: the cost of having difficult people around. In a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and funded by the National Institute on Aging, they found that each additional "hassler" a person regularly deals with was associated with a 1.5 percent faster pace of biological aging.
The researchers defined hasslers as people who create problems or make life more difficult. The work was led by Byungkyu Lee, an assistant professor of sociology at NYU, with Brea Perry, a sociology professor at Indiana University at Bloomington and associate director of the Irsay Institute for Sociomedical Sciences Research, as co-author. Their starting point was that strong social networks are known to protect health, lowering the risk of cognitive impairment and death, and that friendships may even slow aging at the cellular level. But, Lee said, not all social ties are supportive.
The team drew on data from more than 2,000 people in a health survey conducted in Indiana. Participants described their relationships over the previous six months, then answered follow-up questions about how often a given person hassled them, caused problems or made life harder. They also rated their own overall health and provided saliva samples, which were analyzed for DNA changes that signal biological aging. That let the researchers compare people with hasslers in their networks against those without.
The arithmetic is modest. A person would normally age one biological year per calendar year; with one extra hassler, the study suggests, that becomes about 1.015 years. Perry said even small effects can accumulate and may contribute to earlier onset of chronic disease. The association was especially strong for people with two or more hasslers in their lives.
The authors are explicit about the limits. The study does not prove cause and effect. "We do not know whether hasslers actually cause people to age," Lee said; what the data show is an association between having hasslers and the rate of aging.
Certain groups reported more hasslers. Women generally had more than men, a finding Debra Umberson, a sociology professor and director of the Center on Aging and Population Sciences at the University of Texas at Austin, called "not completely shocking." She was not involved in the study. Perry noted that women tend to be more strongly affected, for better and worse, by their relationships, and may be more likely to perceive and take on others' problems as stress. People in poorer health and those with adverse childhood experiences also reported more hasslers. Perry theorized that people with health problems may need caregiving, which can make relationships one-sided and hard to negotiate, while those with difficult childhoods may be more vulnerable to chronic stressors.
Many hasslers turned out to be family. Perry described them as people embedded in your life in ways that are hard to escape or renegotiate. Among relatives, parents and children were more likely to be named than partners or spouses. Among non-relatives, co-workers, roommates and, to a lesser degree, neighbors were more often hasslers than friends were, groups that, like family, involve obligation and shared space.
The obvious advice, Lee said, is to avoid hasslers or cut ties when someone adds heavy stress, though that is a hard decision and often unrealistic, especially with family. Umberson pointed out that every relationship carries some hassle alongside support and love. Perry suggested limiting time with a hassler, considering therapy, setting limits on the effort you put in, and planning self-care before and after encounters. Lee recommended investing steadily in supportive relationships as a buffer, though the study did not test whether that calms aging.
Umberson stressed that connection still matters most. Last year the World Health Organization released a global report linking loneliness to 871,000 deaths every year. The next step for researchers is untangling cause from association.
Citations marquantes
We do not know whether hasslers actually cause people to age.— Byungkyu Lee, NYU assistant professor of sociology and lead author
Set limits on the effort you're putting into that relationship once you recognize a hassler's biological consequences.— Brea Perry, Indiana University sociologist and study co-author (paraphrased)