Drone strikes on Sudan funeral kill at least 4, rights groups say RSF responsible

At least 23 civilians killed in drone strikes on funeral procession, residential areas, and supply routes; multiple injured; part of systematic attacks displacing millions.
Roofs collapsed on their occupants. No one could have survived.
A resident describing the aftermath of drone strikes on residential neighborhoods in el-Obeid.

In the Sudanese city of el-Obeid, a drone struck mourners gathered at a cemetery on Wednesday evening, killing at least four people — one moment among many in a two-day campaign of aerial strikes that claimed at least 23 lives across residential neighborhoods, supply routes, and an airport district. The Rapid Support Forces, a paramilitary faction three years into a civil war against Sudan's national army, are accused of carrying out the attacks on a city whose geography makes it a prize worth terrible violence. El-Obeid stands as both a strategic gateway to oil-rich Kordofan and a mirror of what this war has become: a conflict that has displaced over eleven million people and produced what observers now call the world's worst humanitarian catastrophe.

  • A drone struck a funeral procession mid-grief, turning a cemetery into a site of fresh death — four killed, others wounded, mourners becoming casualties.
  • Over two days, coordinated strikes hit homes, an airport district, an army base perimeter, and a food supply truck, suggesting not random violence but deliberate, systematic targeting of civilian life.
  • El-Obeid is encircled — army-held but surrounded by RSF territory — making every strike on its infrastructure a move in a larger campaign to control Sudan's oil supply and interior.
  • Rights groups documenting the attacks describe a pattern of repeated civilian targeting, with residents gathering near rubble only to be struck again in successive waves.
  • The RSF has issued no response to the accusations, and with no ceasefire in sight, el-Obeid remains locked in the brutal logic of a war that has already killed at least fifty thousand people.

On Wednesday evening, a drone struck a funeral procession at a cemetery in el-Obeid, killing at least four people and wounding others. It was one of several strikes that unfolded across the city over two days, documented by Sudan Doctors Network and Emergency Lawyers — two organizations tracking the violence. Their combined count reached at least 23 dead. Both groups attribute the attacks to the Rapid Support Forces, the paramilitary faction fighting Sudan's national army in a civil war now entering its third year. The RSF has not responded.

El-Obeid occupies a fraught position in this conflict. The city is held by the army but surrounded by RSF-controlled territory, and it anchors access to the oil-rich Kordofan region — making it a focal point of the war's strategic brutality. The strikes were not confined to the cemetery: drones hit residential neighborhoods, the airport district, and areas near an army base. Thirteen civilians died when drones struck houses, with residents drawn to the wreckage before further attacks came. A truck driver carrying food supplies was killed on Thursday. One resident described collapsed roofs and destruction so complete it seemed impossible anyone inside could have lived.

The rights groups are careful to frame this not as an isolated incident but as part of a sustained pattern of civilian targeting. The wider war has already produced what is now described as the world's worst humanitarian crisis — more than eleven million displaced, twenty-eight million facing acute hunger, and a death toll estimated at no fewer than fifty thousand. El-Obeid, still contested and still burning, holds that catastrophe in miniature.

A funeral procession at a cemetery in el-Obeid became a killing ground on Wednesday evening when a drone struck the gathering, leaving at least four people dead and others wounded. The attack was one of several that unfolded across the Sudanese city over two days, according to Sudan Doctors Network and Emergency Lawyers, two organizations documenting the violence. By their count, at least 23 people died in the coordinated strikes. Both groups say the Rapid Support Forces, a paramilitary faction locked in Sudan's three-year civil war, carried out the attacks. The RSF has offered no response to the accusations.

El-Obeid sits at the violent center of Sudan's conflict, a city currently held by the national army but surrounded by territory controlled by the RSF. The war itself began when the leaders of these two military powers fell into dispute over the country's future, and the fighting has since consumed the nation. The city's location makes it strategically vital—it sits between RSF-held areas to the west and army-controlled territory to the east, and it anchors access to the oil-rich Kordofan region. Whoever controls el-Obeid effectively controls much of Sudan's oil supply and a substantial portion of the country itself.

The Wednesday strikes were not confined to the cemetery. Drones hit homes in residential neighborhoods, the airport district, and areas near an army base. Emergency Lawyers documented that thirteen civilians died when drones struck houses, with residents gathering near the destroyed structures when the attacks came. In an earlier wave of strikes, five more civilians were killed. A truck driver transporting food supplies died when his vehicle was hit on Thursday. One resident, speaking to the AFP news agency after the attacks, described the devastation in stark terms: roofs had collapsed onto people inside, and looking at some of the damaged houses, it seemed impossible anyone could have survived.

The two rights groups describe not an isolated incident but a pattern—systematic and repeated attacks on civilians over several days. This latest violence unfolds within a war that has already become the world's worst humanitarian catastrophe. More than eleven million people have been forced from their homes. Twenty-eight million face acute hunger. The death toll remains uncounted with precision, but estimates place it at a minimum of fifty thousand. The fighting shows no sign of abating, and el-Obeid, as a key battleground, remains a focal point of the conflict's brutality.

The roofs of houses collapsed on their occupants. When you look at some houses, you feel no-one could have survived.
— El-Obeid resident speaking to AFP
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why does el-Obeid matter so much that both sides are willing to fight this hard for it?

Model

It's not just the city itself—it's what the city controls. Whoever holds el-Obeid controls the flow of oil from the Kordofan region and effectively controls the country's economic lifeline. That's why it's become a front line.

Inventor

And the RSF—they're the ones conducting these drone strikes?

Model

That's what the documentation groups are saying. The RSF hasn't denied it or responded at all, which in itself is telling. They have the capability and the motive to strike army-held territory.

Inventor

The funeral procession—was that a deliberate target, or collateral damage?

Model

That's the question no one can answer with certainty. What we know is that drones struck a cemetery where people were gathered, then struck homes, then the airport area. Whether each target was chosen deliberately or whether the strikes were indiscriminate is something the RSF would need to explain.

Inventor

Eleven million displaced. That number is almost incomprehensible.

Model

It is. And it keeps growing. Every strike, every attack, every day of fighting pushes more people out. The humanitarian crisis isn't separate from the military conflict—it's the direct result of it.

Inventor

What happens to el-Obeid next?

Model

That depends on whether the RSF can break through army lines or whether the army can hold. Either way, the civilians caught in between will keep paying the price.

Contact Us FAQ