In a country where fuel prices have long been a quiet measure of ordinary family budgets, a proposal to let petrol float once global crude falls below US$70 a barrel has met resistance from within the governing coalition's own ranks. Raja Ahmad Iskandar Fareez, deputy chief of DAP's youth wing, argues that the idea rests on a hope that oil markets will obligingly cooperate, at a time when conflict in the Middle East makes such calm hard to expect. The disagreement is less about whether subsidies should exist than about who bears the risk of waiting, and how much protection a cash payment can r
DAP Youth Deputy Chief Calls Bersama's RON95 Price-Float Proposal Unrealistic
Raja Ahmad warns that a RM4.32 per litre pump price would hit hardest the households least able to absorb it.
Oil markets don't move to anyone's timetable
Mark
What exactly is Bersama proposing?
Mimi
Floating RON95 prices once crude drops below US$70 a barrel, with cash aid for 80% of households, including monthly payments for the first three months.
Mark
And why does Raja Ahmad call that unrealistic?
Mimi
Because the trigger depends on an oil market he says is unpredictable, with Middle East conflict and Gulf attacks adding risk.
Luke
Worth noting the trigger is conditional. Floating only happens if crude falls. His RM4.32 figure is the price he says working families would face if prices floated now, and the statement doesn't show how that was calculated.
Mark
What about the inflation concern?
Mimi
He says higher petrol costs would ripple into transport, logistics, food delivery and daily necessities, and asks whether the cash aid would cover it.
Luke
That's a warning, not a measured result. No estimate of the inflation effect or of the cash aid's size is given.
Mark
How does he defend BUDI95 and BUDI Diesel?
Mimi
He says they let subsidies adjust with the market and reduce leakage to syndicates, smugglers and non-citizens.
Luke
Again, those are his claims. The statement offers no leakage figures.
Le Pouls
- A Bersama proposal to float RON95 petrol prices has landed like a stone in the governing camp's quiet pond.
- DAP Youth's deputy chief calls the trigger of a US$70 crude threshold unrealistic amid Middle East turmoil.
- The spectre of a RM4.32 litre price looms over transport, food delivery and daily essentials, raising fears of a wider price chain reaction.
- Defenders point to BUDI95 and BUDI Diesel as market-responsive safeguards, while the open questions of cash aid adequacy and inflation control remain unanswered.
In a country where fuel prices have long been a quiet measure of ordinary family budgets, a proposal to let petrol float once global crude falls below US$70 a barrel has met resistance from within the governing coalition's own ranks. Raja Ahmad Iskandar Fareez, deputy chief of DAP's youth wing, argues that the idea rests on a hope that oil markets will obligingly cooperate, at a time when conflict in the Middle East makes such calm hard to expect. The disagreement is less about whether subsidies should exist than about who bears the risk of waiting, and how much protection a cash payment can really offer when the cost of living shifts beneath it.
A proposal to let Malaysia's RON95 petrol price float has drawn a sharp rebuttal from inside the governing camp. Raja Ahmad Iskandar Fareez, deputy chief of DAP's youth wing, has called the idea put forward by Bersama spokesman Sum Dek Joe unrealistic.
Sum's plan has two parts. Petrol prices would float once global crude falls below US$70 a barrel, and cash assistance would reach 80% of households, with monthly payments for the first three months. Sum acknowledged that removing subsidies could stir social unrest, but argued that the government should not sit idle.
Raja Ahmad's objections are threefold. First, oil markets do not follow anyone's timetable, least of all with conflict spreading in the Middle East. He asked what happens if crude never drops below the threshold: would Bersama keep waiting, or force families to pay RM4.32 a litre? Second, he warned that a steep pump price rise would ripple through transport, logistics, food delivery and daily necessities, and asked whether the cash aid could truly keep pace. Third, he noted that a safe, reliable public transport network, including first- and last-mile links, would take years to build, and in the meantime the heaviest burden would fall on the households least able to bear it.
He points instead to the government's BUDI95 and BUDI Diesel schemes, which he says adjust subsidies to market conditions while protecting ordinary consumers and curbing leakages to syndicates, smugglers and non-citizens. The exchange is ultimately as much about sequencing and safeguards as about subsidies themselves. Watch whether Bersama answers his two central questions.
A proposal to let Malaysia's RON95 petrol price float has drawn a pointed rebuttal from inside the governing camp. Raja Ahmad Iskandar Fareez, deputy chief of DAP's youth wing, issued a statement calling the idea put forward by Bersama spokesman Sum Dek Joe unrealistic.
Sum's proposal had two parts. Petrol prices would be floated once global crude oil falls below US$70 a barrel. Alongside that, cash assistance would go to 80% of households, including monthly payments for the first three months. Sum had acknowledged that some argue removing fuel subsidies could trigger social instability, but he said that did not mean the government should sit idle.
Raja Ahmad's first objection is about the trigger itself. He said the plan fails to account for volatility in the global oil market. In his words, oil markets do not move to anyone's timetable, least of all with conflict spreading in the Middle East, attacks in the Gulf and geopolitical risk running at an all-time high.
He then put a direct question to Bersama: what if crude never falls below US$70? Would the group keep waiting, or float prices now and force working families to pay RM4.32 a litre? That figure runs through his statement as the price he says households would face at the pump.
His second objection concerns what a sharp rise in RON95 prices would set off. Raja Ahmad warned of a chain reaction across the economy, raising costs for transport, logistics, food delivery and daily necessities, among others. He asked whether Bersama's cash assistance would be enough to offset those higher costs, and how the group would stop them being passed on to consumers while keeping inflation under control.
Against this, he pointed to the government's BUDI95 and BUDI Diesel schemes as the better approach. In his account, they allow subsidy levels to be adjusted as market conditions change while still protecting ordinary consumers. He also said the schemes help cut subsidy leakages to commercial syndicates, cross-border smugglers and non-citizens.
The third strand is public transport. Raja Ahmad noted that building a safe and reliable network, including first- and last-mile connectivity, would take years. Until it exists, he said, asking Malaysians to pay RM4.32 at the pump would hit hardest the households least able to absorb it.
The exchange is a argument over sequencing and safeguards as much as over subsidies themselves. What to watch is whether Bersama answers the two questions Raja Ahmad has pressed: how its cash aid would measure up against knock-on price rises, and what happens if crude stays above its threshold.
Citations marquantes
Until that network is in place, asking Malaysians to pay RM4.32 at the pump would hit hardest the households least able to absorb it.— Raja Ahmad Iskandar Fareez, DAP Youth deputy chief
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur Free Malaysia Today ↗
Economy & Finance