Somewhere between the slow grinding of ice against bedrock and the quick decisions of governments lies a question that has been quietly building for decades: how much of Antarctica's frozen mass can the warming world afford to lose? Robert DeConto, a polar climate scientist, has traced a threshold near 2060 beyond which the continent's ice may begin to give way in a way that cannot be reversed on any timescale that matters to human life. The stakes depend on the path humanity chooses, with current policies pointing toward three degrees of warming by the end of the century and the Paris commitm
Current Warming Pace Risks Irreversible Antarctic Ice Loss and Sea Level Rise, Study Warns
The next few decades will determine the sea level rise from Antarctica.
Why does 2060 matter so much if the big losses come later?
Because DeConto says that is when the system starts to get away from us. After that, losing the ice shelves can't be reversed on any timescale that matters to people.
What separates the two futures in the paper?
Mostly the warming level. At 3C, Antarctica adds 17 to 21cm by 2100. Under Paris commitments it's 6 to 11cm.
Those are model outputs, though, not measurements. The paper's model includes dynamic ice processes that are hard to predict, and DeConto himself says it isn't the last word.
Is there another estimate to compare against?
Yes, a King's College London paper in Nature, also out Wednesday. It finds sea level rising 0.5cm a year by 2100 at 3C. DeConto says it differs because his accounts for compounding ice shelf loss.
Worth noting that's a different measure, a rate of rise rather than a total, so the two aren't directly comparable. And the 5 metres by 2200 is DeConto's description of a scenario with no emissions cuts, not a forecast of what will happen.
What about Thwaites?
It's a focus of current research. A worst-case loss would add 65cm, but the source doesn't say how likely that is.
Right, and Dutton wasn't involved in the study. Her view is an outside endorsement of the question, not a verification of the numbers.
El Pulso
- A scientist warns that under current government policies, Antarctic ice could tip into abrupt, unstoppable loss around 2060.
- Warming of 3C by 2100 threatens to set off a cascade in which warm seawater erodes the pinning points holding the ice in place.
- Under current policies, Antarctica alone could add 17 to 21 centimetres of sea level rise by century's end, while Paris-aligned cuts would hold that figure to 6 to 11 centimetres.
- Scientists are racing to understand the Thwaites glacier, the so-called doomsday glacier, while a parallel study and ongoing modelling leave the projections open to revision.
Somewhere between the slow grinding of ice against bedrock and the quick decisions of governments lies a question that has been quietly building for decades: how much of Antarctica's frozen mass can the warming world afford to lose? Robert DeConto, a polar climate scientist, has traced a threshold near 2060 beyond which the continent's ice may begin to give way in a way that cannot be reversed on any timescale that matters to human life. The stakes depend on the path humanity chooses, with current policies pointing toward three degrees of warming by the end of the century and the Paris commitments offering a far gentler future. What the next few decades decide is not only how high the seas will rise, but whether that rise will be something coastal societies can adapt to or something that permanently reshapes where people can live.
Robert DeConto, a polar climate scientist at the University of Massachusetts, believes the critical moment for Antarctica arrives around 2060. In his new Nature study, if the world continues warming at the pace set by current government policies, the continent's ice loss takes an abrupt turn, raising the spectre of rapid and unstoppable sea level rise that would endanger coastal cities.
The tipping point is tied to a global temperature rise of about 3C above preindustrial levels, a threshold many researchers consider reachable by 2100 under today's policies. Once crossed, the loss would be effectively permanent on a human timescale, since the ice sheet could only recover after the oceans cooled, a process that would take centuries. Antarctica alone could add 17 to 21 centimetres to global seas by the end of the century.
The alternative is far gentler. If countries honour their Paris commitments, Antarctica's contribution would be 6 to 11 centimetres by 2100, roughly matching today's rate of ice loss. DeConto stresses that the coming decades will largely determine the outcome.
Scientists are watching the western ice sheet closely, especially the Thwaites glacier, nicknamed the doomsday glacier, whose loss could add around 65 centimetres to sea levels in a worst case. Warm water is creeping into crevasses and wearing away the pinning points that anchor the ice, and a rapid acceleration could send vast quantities of ice into the Southern Ocean.
DeConto emphasises that these models remain works in progress. A companion study from King's College London reached related conclusions by a different route, and DeConto calls both ongoing work. Andrea Dutton, who was not involved, warns that a major Antarctic acceleration would force coastal retreat on an unprecedented scale and that engineering alone cannot solve the problem, making deep and sustained emissions cuts urgent.
Robert DeConto, a polar climate scientist at the University of Massachusetts, puts the timing of the problem at about 2060. That is when, in his new Nature paper, Antarctica's ice loss takes an abrupt jump if the world keeps warming at the rate set by current government policies. The study warns the result would be "rapid and unstoppable" sea level rise, with coastal cities in greater danger.
The trigger is a global temperature rise of 3C (5.4F) above preindustrial levels. Many researchers consider that feasible by 2100 under today's policies. If it happens, the paper finds, Antarctic ice loss would be irreversible on multi-century timescales, and the continent alone would help raise the oceans by 17cm to 21cm (6.69in to 8.27in) by the end of the century.
The alternative is far smaller. If countries meet their Paris agreement commitments, Antarctica would add 6cm to 11cm by 2100, on a par with the current rate of ice loss. Under Paris, governments have pledged to hold warming below 2C above preindustrial times, while pursuing efforts to limit it to 1.5C.
DeConto, the lead author, explained why the loss cannot be undone. Once enough heat has gone into the climate system, he said, the ice shelves will be lost, and once that is set in motion it cannot be reversed. The oceans would have to cool before the ice sheet could heal, which would take a very long time. "On a societal timescale it would essentially be a permanent change," he said. "It's really the next few decades that will determine the sea level rise from Antarctica."
The stakes are large. If all of Antarctica's ice melted, global sea levels would rise by 57 metres, enough to submerge the world's coasts, though that is not expected on any foreseeable timescale. Even a small increase in loss would be felt, and scientists are especially concerned about the western part of the ice sheet. There they are studying the decline of the Thwaites glacier, known as the doomsday glacier. It is about the size of Britain and 1km deep, and in a worst case its loss would raise sea levels by 65cm.
The ice is being worn down by a warming atmosphere and by heating oceans. Warmer seawater enters crevasses and erodes the "pinning points" that hold enormous bodies of ice to the submerged bedrock. A rapid acceleration could set off a cascade, with huge amounts of ice and water flowing unimpeded into the Southern Ocean.
The effects would play out over centuries. "In the century after 2100 it's potentially catastrophic," DeConto said. With no emissions reductions at all, he said, Antarctica alone could produce 5 metres of sea level rise by 2200, at which point you would have to remap the world from space. The paper relies on a model that combines temperature rise and ice loss with the dynamic processes in Antarctica, which make precise prediction difficult.
A second Nature paper, published the same Wednesday by scientists at King's College London, finds sea level would rise by 0.5cm every year by 2100 if global temperature reaches 3C. DeConto called it an impressive piece of work but noted it differs from his, which includes the compounding effects of ice shelf loss. "Neither of these papers are the last word, this is ongoing work," he said. The real question, he added, is whether the world will face sea level rise at a manageable or unmanageable rate.
Andrea Dutton, a sea level expert at the University of Wisconsin–Madison who was not involved, said the paper addresses an important and pressing question about what the Paris targets mean for sea level. A major acceleration in Antarctic melting, she said, would bring coastal retreat and migration on a scale never before witnessed. "We will not be able to just adapt because it is impossible to just engineer our way out of this," she said, calling the finding a reminder of the urgency of deep and sustained emissions cuts.
Citas Notables
On a societal timescale it would essentially be a permanent change.— Robert DeConto, University of Massachusetts
We will not be able to just adapt because it is impossible to just engineer our way out of this.— Andrea Dutton, University of Wisconsin–Madison