A large study following tens of thousands of patients through Kaiser Permanente's Southern California network has quietly unsettled a prevailing assumption: that COVID-19 leaves a uniquely devastating trail of long-term illness compared to influenza. Published in October 2025, the research finds that for most people, the two viruses impose strikingly similar burdens in the months after recovery — though for those hospitalized during acute illness, COVID-19 carries a meaningfully heavier shadow. The findings invite a reckoning not only with COVID-19's legacy, but with how long influenza's own c
COVID-19 and flu pose similar long-term risks, except for severe cases
The long-term burden of influenza may have been historically underestimated.
So the headline here is that COVID and flu are basically the same in terms of long-term complications?
Not quite. For most people—those who got sick but didn't need to be hospitalized—the long-term risk is nearly identical. But if you were hospitalized with COVID, you faced significantly higher risk of needing hospital care again for complications.
How much higher? The paper says 31 to 49 percent. That's a real difference, but it's worth asking: is that because COVID itself causes worse long-term damage, or because people hospitalized with COVID were sicker to begin with?
That's the key question. The researchers adjusted for severity during the acute phase, but they found the excess risk was concentrated entirely among hospitalized patients. People who had mild or moderate COVID treated in ambulatory settings or emergency departments showed no excess risk compared to flu.
What about the numbers overall? How many people are we talking about experiencing these complications?
Nearly half of both groups. Forty-five percent of COVID patients and 39 percent of flu patients developed post-acute conditions requiring medical care within three months. By six months, it was 53 percent and 44 percent.
But that's only counting conditions serious enough to show up in medical records. The study explicitly says it didn't capture patient-reported symptoms or quality-of-life measures. Someone could be struggling with fatigue or brain fog and never appear in these numbers.
Did anything actually reduce the risk?
Yes. Antiviral treatment during the acute illness reduced post-acute complications. And people who were vaccinated—up-to-date with COVID or flu shots—showed no excess risk of severe post-acute illness.
That's interesting because it suggests prevention of severe acute illness is the real lever. If you don't get severely sick in the first place, the long-term risk looks similar regardless of which virus.
So what's the practical takeaway?
That vaccination and early antiviral treatment matter not just for the immediate illness but for preventing months of complications afterward. And that influenza's long-term burden may deserve more clinical attention than it's historically received.
One more thing to flag: influenza testing was less common during this period than COVID testing. If milder flu cases went undetected, the flu group might have been skewed toward more severe cases, which could artificially narrow the comparison.
O Pulso
- Nearly half of all patients — COVID-19 and influenza alike — developed complications requiring medical care within three months, revealing a post-acute burden far larger than public discourse has acknowledged for either virus.
- The assumed gulf between COVID-19 and flu long-hauler risk is narrower than believed: only a 4% difference in post-acute sequelae within the first three months, fading to near-parity by six months.
- A critical fault line emerges among the sickest patients — those hospitalized with COVID-19 faced 31 to 49% higher risk of severe post-acute complications requiring readmission compared to hospitalized flu patients, a gap that held across the full follow-up period.
- Antiviral treatment and current vaccination status both reduced COVID-19's post-acute risk advantage, pointing toward prevention and early intervention as the most actionable levers against long-term harm.
- Influenza's chronic aftermath, documented in medical literature for over a century, may have been systematically underestimated — this study suggests the field's attention has been unevenly distributed.
A large study following tens of thousands of patients through Kaiser Permanente's Southern California network has quietly unsettled a prevailing assumption: that COVID-19 leaves a uniquely devastating trail of long-term illness compared to influenza. Published in October 2025, the research finds that for most people, the two viruses impose strikingly similar burdens in the months after recovery — though for those hospitalized during acute illness, COVID-19 carries a meaningfully heavier shadow. The findings invite a reckoning not only with COVID-19's legacy, but with how long influenza's own chronic toll has gone unexamined.
A study published in PLOS Medicine in October 2025 followed nearly 75,000 COVID-19 patients and close to 19,000 influenza patients through Kaiser Permanente's Southern California health system, tracing what happened to their health in the months after acute illness resolved. The researchers tracked patients across the full range of care settings — from telehealth visits to hospital wards — between September 2022 and December 2023.
The headline finding challenges a widely held assumption: within 31 to 90 days of infection, COVID-19 patients had only a 4% higher risk of post-acute sequelae than influenza patients. By six months, that difference had nearly disappeared. Overall, 45% of COVID-19 patients and 39% of influenza patients developed complications requiring medical care within three months; by six months, those figures climbed to 53% and 44%. Heart and lung problems led the list for both groups, followed by neurological, muscular, kidney, and mental health conditions.
The picture changed sharply, however, among patients who had been hospitalized during their initial illness. COVID-19 patients in that group faced 31 to 49% higher risk of severe post-acute complications requiring hospital readmission compared to their influenza counterparts — a gap that persisted throughout the entire follow-up period. Among those whose infections were mild enough to manage at home or in an emergency department, no meaningful difference in severe post-acute risk emerged between the two viruses.
Two factors appeared to close the gap: antiviral treatment during acute illness reduced the risk of severe post-acute complications, and patients with current vaccination status — whether COVID-19 or influenza — showed no significant difference in severe post-acute outcomes compared to the other group. Prevention of severe acute illness, the researchers suggest, may be the most effective path to avoiding long-term harm.
The study carries important caveats. It captured only complications serious enough to prompt a healthcare visit, leaving out patient-reported symptoms and quality-of-life impacts. Children were excluded, asymptomatic infections were not tracked, and broader COVID-19 testing during the study period may have captured milder cases that went undetected in the flu cohort. Still, the findings point toward a more balanced reckoning: influenza's long-term burden has likely been underestimated for decades, while COVID-19's post-acute risk — though real and serious for the most severely ill — may be less categorically distinct from flu than previously assumed.
Researchers tracking nearly 75,000 COVID-19 cases and almost 19,000 influenza cases through Kaiser Permanente's Southern California health system have found something that challenges a widespread assumption: the long-term health complications that follow COVID-19 are not dramatically different from those that follow the flu.
The study, published in PLOS Medicine in October 2025, examined what happens in the months after people recover from their acute illness. Between September 2022 and December 2023, the researchers followed patients across the full spectrum of care—from those who saw a doctor by video call to those hospitalized with severe respiratory disease. Within 31 to 90 days after infection, COVID-19 patients had only a 4 percent higher risk of developing post-acute sequelae, the medical term for lingering complications. By the time six months had passed, that difference had nearly vanished. The risk of any post-acute condition was essentially the same for both groups.
But there is a crucial exception. When the researchers looked specifically at severe complications requiring hospital admission, the picture shifted. COVID-19 patients who had been hospitalized during their initial illness faced 31 to 49 percent higher risk of needing inpatient care again for post-acute problems compared to influenza patients who had also been hospitalized. This gap persisted through the entire six-month follow-up period. Among patients whose initial infection was mild enough to treat at home or in an emergency department, no meaningful difference emerged between COVID-19 and influenza in terms of severe post-acute complications.
The study included 74,738 COVID-19 cases and 18,790 influenza cases, with nearly all participants retained through at least three months of follow-up. Overall, 45 percent of COVID-19 patients and 39 percent of influenza patients developed post-acute conditions requiring medical care within the first three months. By six months, those figures rose to 53 percent and 44 percent respectively. Heart and lung problems dominated the list of complications for both groups, followed by conditions affecting the nervous system, muscles, kidneys, and mental health.
Two factors appeared to narrow the gap between COVID-19 and influenza outcomes. Patients who received antiviral medications during their acute illness showed reduced risk of severe post-acute complications. Similarly, people whose vaccination status was current at the time of infection—three or more COVID-19 vaccine doses for COVID patients, or a recent flu shot for influenza patients—showed no meaningful difference in severe post-acute risk compared to the other group. This suggests that preventing severe acute illness in the first place may be the most effective way to avoid long-term complications.
The researchers acknowledge important limitations. Their analysis captured only complications serious enough to require a healthcare visit, missing patient-reported symptoms and quality-of-life impacts that might not show up in medical records. The study also did not include children, and it was restricted to people who received a diagnosis of acute respiratory illness, meaning asymptomatic infections were not tracked. Testing practices differed during the study period—COVID-19 testing was more widespread than influenza testing—which could have skewed the comparison if milder flu cases went undetected.
The findings suggest that the long-term burden of influenza may have been historically underestimated. While post-COVID conditions have received substantial medical and public attention, similar complications following influenza have been documented in medical literature for over a century but have not generated equivalent clinical focus or research investment. The study points toward a more nuanced understanding: both viruses carry substantial risk of long-term health consequences, but the nature of that risk differs. For most people, the two infections pose comparable threats. For those sick enough to require hospitalization, COVID-19 appears to carry a higher risk of severe post-acute illness—a distinction that may reflect the greater severity of COVID-19 among hospitalized patients rather than something unique to the virus itself.
Citações Notáveis
In this large, real-world cohort, individuals with non-severe acute respiratory illness caused by SARS-CoV-2 experienced only modestly greater risk of post-acute sequelae in comparison to those whose illness was caused by influenza.— Study authors, PLOS Medicine
While post-acute COVID-19 sequelae are well understood to occur, the burden of post-acute sequelae associated with influenza may have been historically overlooked.— Study authors, PLOS Medicine