In the days before India's surfers were to compete at the Asian Games in Japan, a court in Karnataka found itself weighing a familiar tension in sport: the integrity of process against the urgency of participation. The Karnataka High Court determined that the Surfing Federation of India had violated its own selection rules — its executive council reaching beyond its sanctioned authority — yet chose not to dismantle the team roster, understanding that justice delayed by litigation should not become injury compounded by disqualification. A retired Supreme Court judge has now been called to exami
Court Orders Inquiry Into Surfing Federation's Asian Games Selection Lapses
Surfer Ramesh Budihal was excluded from the main Asian Games contingent despite being a Bronze medalist, forcing him into prolonged litigation instead of focusing on competition.
Athletes forced into prolonged litigation instead of preparing for competition
Mark
Why did the court keep the selection list unchanged if it found the process was broken?
Mimi
Because the Asian Games were nine days away. Changing the team at that point would have disrupted India's entire preparation and potentially cost the country medals. The court separated the immediate practical problem from the deeper governance problem.
Luke
But doesn't that mean Budihal stays excluded even though the court found the process that excluded him was improper? That feels like a hollow victory for him.
Mimi
It does. The court acknowledged the unfairness—that's why it ordered the investigation. But it decided India's sporting interests had to come first.
Mark
What exactly did the executive council do wrong?
Mimi
The federation's own rules say the executive council can only approve selections that the selection committee has already made. Here, the committee couldn't decide between Budihal and Babu, so the council just picked one themselves. That's overstepping.
Luke
Did the selection committee have the authority to order a surf-off, or was that member right to object?
Mimi
That's one of the 45 points the retired judge will examine. The norms apparently don't explicitly allow for a surf-off as a tiebreaker, which is why the member resigned.
Mark
So this inquiry—what comes of it?
Mimi
Recommendations for how to fix the selection process and the federation's bylaws. Ideally, clearer rules so this doesn't happen again.
Luke
But Budihal still doesn't get to compete at these Games, and the inquiry report won't come out for months. What does he actually get?
Mimi
Vindication that the process was wrong. Whether that translates into a future opportunity depends on what the judge recommends and whether the federation acts on it.
O Pulso
- A bronze medalist at the 2025 Asian Surfing Championship was left off India's confirmed Asian Games roster, forcing him into litigation just days before competition was to begin in Japan.
- The federation's own appeals panel had already invalidated the first selection attempt, citing an improperly constituted committee — meaning the process failed not once but twice before reaching the courts.
- When a reconstituted selection committee deadlocked over the final spots and one member resigned in protest over a proposed surf-off, the executive council stepped in and made the call itself — a move the High Court ruled was plainly outside its authority.
- Justice Suraj Govindaraj declined to overturn the roster at the eleventh hour, reasoning that correcting one injustice should not create another by jeopardizing India's participation in the Games.
- Retired Supreme Court judge R.V. Raveendran has been tasked with examining 45 points in the federation's selection norms and recommending structural reforms to prevent governance failures from again pulling athletes into court.
In the days before India's surfers were to compete at the Asian Games in Japan, a court in Karnataka found itself weighing a familiar tension in sport: the integrity of process against the urgency of participation. The Karnataka High Court determined that the Surfing Federation of India had violated its own selection rules — its executive council reaching beyond its sanctioned authority — yet chose not to dismantle the team roster, understanding that justice delayed by litigation should not become injury compounded by disqualification. A retired Supreme Court judge has now been called to examine not merely what went wrong, but how the architecture of selection itself might be rebuilt so that athletes like Ramesh Budihal, a bronze medalist reduced to a reserve, need not choose between the courtroom and the water.
A week before India's surfing contingent was due to compete at the 2026 Asian Games in Japan, the Karnataka High Court intervened in a selection dispute that had been building for months. At its center was Ramesh Budihal, a Kerala surfer who had won bronze at the Asian Surfing Championship in 2025, yet found himself listed as a first reserve rather than a confirmed competitor — a position he argued was the product of a fundamentally flawed process.
The trouble had begun earlier in the year, when an appeals panel struck down the federation's original selection on the grounds that the selection committee had been improperly constituted. The federation was ordered to begin again, drawing on results from January 2025 onward. A new committee was formed, and it agreed on one athlete — Kishore Kumar — without difficulty. But when it came to the remaining spots, the committee fractured. One member proposed a surf-off between Budihal and rival Sivaraj Babu of Tamil Nadu; another objected that this contradicted the federation's own norms and resigned. The committee could not reach a decision.
Facing an immovable deadline, the federation's executive council stepped in and made the call itself, naming Babu as the second confirmed athlete and Budihal as the reserve. Justice Suraj Govindaraj found this to be a clear overreach: the executive council's role was to ratify the selection committee's decisions, not to substitute its own judgment when that committee failed to produce one.
Still, the court stopped short of reordering the roster. Disrupting the team days before competition, the judge reasoned, would punish India's athletes for the federation's failures. Instead, the court appointed retired Supreme Court judge R.V. Raveendran to conduct a formal inquiry — not to determine which surfer deserved selection, but to examine whether proper procedures had been followed and to recommend reforms across 45 identified points in the federation's selection guidelines.
Justice Govindaraj made his frustration plain: athletes should be preparing to compete, not navigating litigation. The Asian Games were set to open September 19 in Japan. By holding the current list in place while ordering the investigation, the court attempted to honor both the integrity of governance and the reality of the Games — leaving Budihal to wait, and the federation to reckon with what its own rules actually require.
A week before India's surfing team was set to compete at the Asian Games in Japan, the Karnataka High Court stepped in to order an investigation into how the Surfing Federation of India had chosen its athletes. The court found serious procedural violations in the selection process but stopped short of overturning the final roster, reasoning that changing the team at the last moment would damage India's chances in the competition.
The dispute centered on Ramesh Budihal, a surfer from Kerala who won bronze at the Asian Surfing Championship in 2025. Budihal had been placed as a first reserve rather than selected as a confirmed competitor, while another surfer, Sivaraj Babu of Tamil Nadu, was chosen as the second confirmed athlete. Budihal challenged the decision, arguing the selection process itself was flawed.
The chain of events that led to the court order began in June when an appeals panel invalidated the federation's initial selection, citing improper constitution of the selection committee. The panel ordered the federation to start over, this time using performances from January 2025 onward. The Surfing Federation then created a special selection committee to redo the work. That committee unanimously selected Kishore Kumar as the first confirmed athlete and Srikanth D. as the second reserve. But when it came to deciding between Budihal and Babu for the remaining spots, the committee could not reach consensus. One member proposed a surf-off competition between the two, but another committee member objected, arguing this contradicted the federation's own selection norms, and resigned in protest.
With the Asian Games deadline approaching, the federation's executive council made what it called an "executive call"—overriding the selection committee's inability to decide and naming Babu as the second confirmed athlete and Budihal as the first reserve. Justice Suraj Govindaraj found this intervention to be a clear violation of the federation's rules. The executive council, he ruled, had authority only to ratify decisions made by the selection committee, not to make independent selections.
The court appointed R.V. Raveendran, a retired Supreme Court judge, to conduct a formal inquiry into why the federation deviated from its own norms. Raveendran was instructed to examine 45 specific points in the selection guidelines and recommend changes to prevent similar disputes in the future. The court made clear that the inquiry would not judge which surfer was the better athlete—only whether proper procedures had been followed.
Justice Govindaraj expressed frustration that athletes were being forced into court battles instead of preparing for competition. The Asian Games were scheduled to begin September 19, 2026, in Japan, running through October 4. By keeping the current selection list in place while ordering the investigation, the court sought to protect India's participation while still addressing the governance failures that had created the mess.
Citações Notáveis
The court expressed anguish that sportspersons were forced into prolonged litigation due to federation lapses meant to serve them— Justice Suraj Govindaraj, Karnataka High Court
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em The Hindu ↗
Politics & Governance