Could Humans Survive Arrakis? A Climate Model Tests Dune's Desert World

Herbert wrote it before anyone had a climate model, and it mostly holds up
The authors note Dune's 1965 publication predates Manabe's first climate model by two years.
Mark

Why would climate scientists spend three weeks of supercomputer time on a sci-fi planet?

Mimi

It's outreach, done in their spare time. It shows how models work, and it feeds into later academic work on desert worlds and exoplanets.

Luke

Worth saying up front: it's a test of a novel's consistency, not a prediction about any real planet.

Mark

What surprised them most?

Mimi

The poles. They get the most extreme temperatures, up to 70°C in summer and down to -75°C in winter, because moisture and high cloud there trap heat.

Mark

So the tropics would be the better place to live?

Mimi

By wet-bulb measures, yes. Humidity is so low that survivable limits are never exceeded there.

Luke

That rests on an assumption, that Dune's people tolerate heat like present-day humans. The authors state it themselves.

Mark

Where does the model contradict Herbert?

Mimi

On rain and ice. The model gives tiny amounts of rain on high ground, and it melts the northern ice cap with no snow to rebuild it.

Luke

And the ozone figure of 0.5 percent comes from the books and encyclopedia, so the model is only as good as that input.

Mimi

Still, for a book written in 1965 with no computers, the authors call it remarkably consistent.

  • A supercomputer grinds for more than three weeks, pushing Earth's weather physics onto a fictional desert planet to see whether it survives scrutiny.
  • Summer sand reaches 70°C across the mid-latitudes while winters plunge toward -75°C at the poles, a violent seasonal swing that unsettles the picture of a stable desert.
  • The tropics, surprisingly, emerge as the most survivable zone, while the mid-latitudes, where most of the population lives, become the deadliest place for human heat stress.
  • The model clashes with the novels on polar ice and rainfall, and the researchers' work now feeds a growing curiosity about how desert exoplanets might actually look.

Somewhere between the pages of a beloved science fiction saga and the patient arithmetic of a supercomputer, a small team of researchers asked whether Frank Herbert's desert world could hold together under the laws that govern our own sky. Their answer is a kind of qualified affirmation: Arrakis, as modeled with Earth's physics, is plausibly habitable, though its seasons swing between scorching and freezing in ways that would test any living thing. It is a reminder that imagined worlds, even those written before climate science had its first computer models, can still be held up to the same honest measure we apply to the planet we inhabit.

A climate model built to simulate Earth's weather spent more than three weeks on a supercomputer, but this time the planet under its gaze was Arrakis, the desert world of Frank Herbert's Dune. The question was simple: keep Earth's physics, feed in what the novels describe, and see whether the result resembles Herbert's world or something stranger. The team, from the universities of Bristol and Sheffield, gave the planet its real topography and a nearly circular orbit, and set its atmosphere broadly Earth-like, with less carbon dioxide and far more ozone, which over two decades would warm the air many times more strongly than CO2.

The results largely held. The tropics reached around 45°C at their hottest and stayed above 15°C at their coldest, much like Earth. The extremes lay elsewhere: summer sand in the mid-latitudes and polar regions could hit 70°C, while winters fell to -40°C in the middle latitudes and -75°C at the poles. The counterintuitive cold at the poles came from moisture and high cloud, since water vapor traps heat.

The model departed from the books in places. It produced small amounts of rain at higher latitudes and over mountains, where the novels insist on none, and it could not keep the northern polar ice cap, which summer heat would melt without winter snow to replenish it. When the researchers asked whether humans could endure such a world, the answer surprised them. The tropics, with humidity so low that dangerous wet-bulb conditions never arose, were more livable than the mid-latitudes, where lowland averages of 50 to 60°C would be deadly and where most of Arrakis's people are said to live. That made the stillsuit, the book's answer to a dry world, seem less like fantasy and more like necessity.

Herbert wrote his first Dune novel in 1965, before the first climate model existed, and the authors note how remarkably consistent his world still looks six decades on. The work was an outreach exercise done in spare time, and its authors expect it to inform future thinking about desert worlds beyond our own.

A climate model that normally simulates Earth's weather ran for more than three weeks on a supercomputer, and the planet it was describing was Arrakis, the desert world of Frank Herbert's Dune. The question the researchers wanted answered was simple: if you keep Earth's physics and feed in what the novels say about the planet, does the result look like Herbert's world or something strange?

The team is Alex Farnsworth and Sebastian Steinig of the University of Bristol, and Michael Farnsworth of the University of Sheffield. They began with a model commonly used to predict weather and climate, and kept the same physical laws that govern Earth. Their reasoning was that an exotic result would suggest either different physics on Arrakis or that Herbert's vision was pure fantasy. They then supplied details from the main novels and the Dune Encyclopedia: the planet's topography and its orbit, which is essentially circular, like Earth's today.

The atmosphere was the last input. It is broadly Earth-like, with less carbon dioxide, 350 parts per million against Earth's 417. The big difference is ozone. Earth's lower atmosphere holds only about 0.000001 percent, while Arrakis has 0.5 percent. That matters because, over a 20-year period, ozone is about 65 times more effective than CO2 at warming the atmosphere.

The results largely held up. In the tropics, the warmest months reach around 45°C and the coldest do not fall below 15°C, similar to Earth. The extremes come elsewhere. In the mid-latitudes and polar regions, summer sand can reach 70°C, which the book also suggests, while winters drop as low as -40°C in the mid-latitudes and -75°C at the poles. That seems backward, since the equator gets more sunlight. But in the model the polar regions carry much more atmospheric moisture and high cloud, and water vapor is a greenhouse gas that warms the climate.

The model departs from the books in a few places. The novels say there is no rain, whereas the model produces very small amounts, limited to higher latitudes in summer and autumn and only over mountains and plateaus. There would also be some clouds in the tropics and polar latitudes, varying by season. The biggest conflict concerns the northern polar ice cap that the books describe as long-standing. In the model, summer temperatures would melt polar ice, and no winter snowfall would replenish it.

The researchers then asked whether humans could live there, assuming the people of Dune have thermal tolerances like ours. Contrary to the book and film, the tropics come out as the most habitable region. Humidity is so low that survivable wet-bulb temperatures, a measure combining heat and humidity, are never exceeded. The mid-latitudes, where most Arrakis residents live, are the most dangerous for heat. Lowland monthly averages are often 50 to 60°C, with daily maximums higher still, which is deadly for humans.

That is where the stillsuit comes in. In the books, all humanoid life outside habitable places must wear one to stay cool and reclaim moisture from sweat, urine and breath. This matters because the novels describe no rainfall, no open standing water and little atmospheric moisture to capture. Cold is a problem as well: outside the tropics, winters would be uninhabitable without technology. Cities like Arrakeen and Carthag would face both heat and cold stress, like an exaggerated version of parts of Siberia.

The authors note that Herbert wrote the first novel in 1965, two years before the recent Nobel laureate Syukuro Manabe published his seminal first climate model, and without any computer. Given that, they say, his world looks remarkably consistent six decades later.

The work was done in the authors' spare time as an outreach piece showing how climate scientists use mathematical models to understand Earth and exoplanets. They say it will feed into future academic work on desert worlds and exoplanets.

Given that, the world he created looks remarkably consistent six decades on.
— Alex Farnsworth, Michael Farnsworth and Sebastian Steinig, The Conversation
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur ScienceAlert ↗
Nous contacter FAQ