In an Australian lab, a handful of living neurons grown on a chip has begun to steer a robotic dog toward a target on a simple map, carrying a long human hope into physical form: that machines might one day decide as flexibly and frugally as living minds do. The neurons sit on their chip, send signals out through electrodes, and receive signals back, and the activity they return is translated into the dog's movement. It is a modest demonstration, but it marks the moment a line of experiments that once lived on screens, in games of Pong and Doom, stepped out into the world of bodies and terrain
Cortical Labs Uses Lab-Grown Neurons to Steer a Robot Dog Toward a Target
The robot dog is steered by neurons grown right on the chip
So what actually happened here? A robot dog is run by brain cells?
A small cluster of lab-grown neurons sits on a chip with electrodes. Signals go in, the neurons respond, and that activity is turned into movement that steers the dog toward a target on a simple map.
Why bother, when AI already exists?
Efficiency and adaptability. The brain uses far less power than AI and copes better with unfamiliar situations. Brett Kagan says robots are good at physical control but struggle to learn quickly or adapt.
Careful, though. Those are the hoped-for advantages. The source says the system isn't fast or efficient yet, so the efficiency claim isn't demonstrated here.
Fair. It's a promise, and Kagan himself calls the dog a simple demonstration.
What about the Honda work?
That one was virtual. An agent moved around a grid seeking a reward. Over 4,000 hours, the team tested almost 1,300 signal combinations.
Which suggests a lot of trial and error. And we don't know how well the dog performed, how often it reached the target, or how long it took. The reporting doesn't say.
What do the researchers say is unsolved?
Reliable communication with the neurons, training them, and knowing which methods give consistent results. They also want to understand how the chips hold information, meaning their memory.
So the remote-work and hazardous-environment uses are possibilities, not results.
Il Polso
- A robot dog is now being guided by living brain cells sitting on a chip, a first step from screen experiments into physical machines.
- Robotics has mastered movement but still stumbles when it must decide, learn quickly, or adapt to shifting conditions.
- Researchers are wrestling with trial and error, with thousands of hours of tuning and nearly 1,300 signal combinations tested in a related grid experiment.
- The work is slow and inefficient for now, and the team is pushing to scale the chips for harder tasks and to understand how they hold memory.
In an Australian lab, a handful of living neurons grown on a chip has begun to steer a robotic dog toward a target on a simple map, carrying a long human hope into physical form: that machines might one day decide as flexibly and frugally as living minds do. The neurons sit on their chip, send signals out through electrodes, and receive signals back, and the activity they return is translated into the dog's movement. It is a modest demonstration, but it marks the moment a line of experiments that once lived on screens, in games of Pong and Doom, stepped out into the world of bodies and terrains. The stakes are less about speed than about a quiet gap the researchers keep returning to: machines have learned to move well, yet deciding where and when to act in an unpredictable world remains the hard part.
A robotic dog in Australia has been guided toward a target on a simple map, and the thing doing the guiding is not a processor but a small cluster of neurons grown in a lab. The cells rest on a chip, wired with electrodes that carry signals both ways: signals flow in, and the neurons' own activity flows back out, becoming movement for the robot. The company behind it, Cortical Labs, calls the dog a simple demonstration, meant to make biological computing feel real.
The ambition behind it starts from a frustration. Robots have grown remarkably skilled at physical control, yet they still struggle to learn quickly or adapt when conditions change. The appeal of living neurons is the brain's economy: far less energy, and a better hand with the unfamiliar. The dog follows earlier experiments in which neuron clusters played Pong and Doom, and a collaboration with Honda Research Institute tested a living chip guiding a virtual agent around a grid, across more than 4,000 hours and nearly 1,300 signal combinations.
The technology is still early, slow, and full of trial and error. The next steps are to scale the chips for more complex work and to learn how they retain information. As one of the researchers put it, the hard part is not growing neurons on silicon but learning to talk to them, train them, and know which methods give reliable results.
A robotic dog in Australia has been steered toward a target on a simple map by a small cluster of neurons grown in a lab. The cells sit on a chip, and they are doing the directing.
The work comes from Cortical Labs. The team grew the neurons directly on the chip and fitted it with electrodes that carry electrical signals in both directions. Signals go into the neurons, and the neurons' own activity comes back out. That returning activity is translated into movement for the attached robot.
Brett Kagan, co-founder and CEO of Cortical Labs, called the robotic dog a simple demonstration. He said it makes the prospect of applying biological systems in the real world tangible. Over the longer term, he said, the approach could support robots and autonomous systems that must make decisions in unpredictable environments.
His argument starts from a gap in robotics. Machines have become remarkably capable at physical control, he said, yet they still struggle with the higher-order control needed to learn quickly or adapt when conditions change. Walking, running and acrobatics are impressive, but deciding where and when to act remains hard with traditional methods.
The underlying appeal is the brain's economy. Living neurons as the basis of computer chips promise advantages in energy efficiency and adaptability. However sophisticated AI has become, the human brain runs on far less power and still handles the unfamiliar better.
The robot dog follows earlier Cortical Labs demonstrations in which clusters of neurons completed computer tasks, including playing Pong and Doom. Here the idea moves out of the screen and into a physical machine.
A related demonstration was run with Honda Research Institute Europe, entirely inside a virtual system. The aim was the same: guide an agent around a basic grid in search of a reward. The setup also matched, with electrical signals stimulating neurons on a chip and the chip sending back messages of its own. By varying the characteristics of the signal and giving feedback on the agent's moves, the researchers could train the living chip and interpret its movement. Over more than 4,000 hours of interaction between chip and agent, the team tested almost 1,300 different signal combinations.
Daniel Tanneberg, a Senior Scientist at Honda Research Institute Europe, said the collaboration lets researchers investigate fundamentally different approaches to intelligent agents. Using living cells as the core computational substrate brings many challenges, he said, but also potential in energy efficiency, robustness and adaptation that can now be explored and evaluated.
The technology is early. It is not yet particularly fast or efficient, and the Honda work involved a fair amount of trial and error. Next steps are scaling up the chips to handle more complex tasks in less time, since real-world robots will need to do much more than cross a simple grid. Researchers also want to learn how these chips retain information and what kind of memory they might have.
Johnson Zhou, a Research Software Engineer at Cortical Labs, framed the central difficulty: the challenge is not simply growing neurons on silicon but finding reliable ways to communicate with them, train them, and identify which approaches produce consistent results. The research, he said, provides a framework for testing those questions at scale. Possible future uses include neuron-controlled robots working in remote or hazardous conditions, or machines that give personalized responses that improve over time.
Citazioni salienti
The robotic dog is a simple demonstration of how progress in biological systems can also be applied into the real world, but it helps make the opportunity tangible.— Brett Kagan, co-founder and CEO, Cortical Labs
The challenge is not simply growing neurons on silicon: it is finding reliable ways to communicate with biological systems, train them and understand which approaches produce consistent results.— Johnson Zhou, Research Software Engineer, Cortical Labs