Cornell DA Reopens Gang Rape Investigation After Fresh Lawsuit Alleges Drugging, Assault

A student was allegedly drugged with ketamine and gang-raped by seven fraternity members over several hours in October 2024, causing her to leave the university.
Forced to consume a drug for the first time, then assaulted for hours
The victim's lawsuit alleges she was coerced into taking ketamine and then sexually assaulted by multiple fraternity members throughout the night.
Mark

Why did the DA decide to reopen this now, after nearly two years?

Mimi

The civil lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court appears to have prompted the review. The victim's allegations in that filing are described as "dramatically different" from what she told police in 2024, which suggests she may have disclosed additional details or new evidence has emerged.

Luke

But we should be careful here—we don't actually know what those differences are. The DA said the allegations are "dramatically different," but the article doesn't specify how. That's a significant gap.

Mark

What exactly is the victim alleging happened?

Mimi

She says she was forced to consume ketamine at the Chi Phi house, then assaulted by multiple men over several hours starting around 1:42 a.m. until 5:45 a.m. One of the accused sent a message to a fraternity group chat using dehumanizing language, which is included as evidence in the lawsuit.

Luke

The lawsuit includes a screenshot of that message, which is concrete. But we're relying entirely on the victim's account for the sequence of events and the duration. There's no independent corroboration mentioned in the reporting.

Mark

Why weren't charges filed the first time?

Mimi

The article doesn't explicitly say. The DA's office decided not to pursue charges in November 2024 after the victim's initial police statement, but the specific reasons aren't detailed here.

Luke

That's a critical missing piece. We don't know if it was insufficient evidence, credibility concerns, jurisdictional issues, or something else. The reopening suggests the DA may have changed his mind, but without knowing why he declined initially, it's hard to assess what's actually changed.

Mark

What happens next?

Mimi

The DA intends to present the case to the Tompkins County grand jury with the victim's cooperation. The grand jury will decide whether there's probable cause to support criminal charges against the seven fraternity members.

Luke

That's the procedural next step, yes. But the outcome is genuinely uncertain. A grand jury could decline to indict, or it could indict on some or all of the charges. We're at the beginning of a process, not the end of one.

  • A student who left her family and moved across the country to attend Cornell now alleges she was drugged with ketamine and gang-raped by seven fraternity brothers over nearly four hours — an assault she says was coordinated and deliberate.
  • A Snapchat message sent to a group called 'Chi Phi Actives' — included as a screenshot in the civil filing — suggests the accused may have communicated openly about what was happening to the victim, adding a chilling dimension of premeditation to the allegations.
  • Prosecutors who closed the case in late 2024 are now confronting a civil complaint whose account diverges so sharply from the victim's original police statement that the District Attorney himself called the difference 'dramatic,' raising questions about what changed and why.
  • The case is headed to a grand jury, where jurors will weigh both old and newly surfaced evidence to decide whether criminal charges against the seven fraternity members are warranted — an outcome that remains far from certain.

Nearly two years after a Cornell University student reported being drugged and sexually assaulted by seven fraternity members, the machinery of justice has been set back into motion — this time by a civil lawsuit rather than a criminal complaint. The Tompkins County District Attorney, who once declined to pursue charges, now intends to bring the case before a grand jury, acknowledging that new allegations are 'dramatically different' from the victim's original account. It is a reminder that the path toward accountability is rarely straight, and that the law sometimes requires a second door before it will open.

A civil lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court has forced prosecutors in upstate New York to reopen a criminal investigation into allegations that seven Cornell University fraternity members drugged and sexually assaulted a student in October 2024. The Tompkins County District Attorney's office, which had declined to pursue charges after the victim's initial police report, now says it will present the case to a grand jury.

The victim, identified only as Jane Doe, alleges she was coerced into consuming ketamine at the Chi Phi fraternity house and then assaulted by multiple men over several hours — beginning in the early morning and continuing for nearly four hours. The lawsuit includes a screenshot of a message sent to a Snapchat group called 'Chi Phi Actives,' which prosecutors and the victim's attorneys say reflects the defendants' awareness and intent.

District Attorney Matthew Van Houten acknowledged to ABC News that the civil complaint's allegations are 'dramatically different' from what the victim told police roughly a week after the assault occurred — a discrepancy that now sits at the center of the reopened investigation. His office says it wants to determine whether evidence unavailable in November 2024, when charges were first declined, has since come to light.

The victim's lawsuit describes a calculated sequence of events: after she refused a sexual proposition, she was allegedly forced to consume ketamine for the first time, and once incapacitated, the assault began. She had arrived at Cornell after moving across the country, drawn by what she describes as a misleading portrayal of campus Greek life. The night began with her sorority sisters before she met one of the defendants at the fraternity house.

Following her report to campus and Ithaca police, the seven accused students and the university were placed on temporary suspension — but no charges followed. The decision to now bring the case before a grand jury signals that prosecutors believe the allegations deserve serious reconsideration, even as the outcome remains uncertain.

A civil lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court has forced prosecutors in upstate New York to reopen a criminal investigation into allegations that seven Cornell University fraternity members drugged and sexually assaulted a student in October 2024. The Tompkins County District Attorney's office, which had declined to pursue charges after the victim's initial report to police nearly two years ago, now says it intends to present the case to a grand jury and examine whether evidence that has emerged since then changes the legal calculus.

The victim, identified in court filings only as Jane Doe, alleges that she was coerced into consuming ketamine at the Chi Phi fraternity house and then assaulted by multiple men over several hours, beginning around 1:42 a.m. and continuing until 5:45 that morning. According to the lawsuit, one of the accused fraternity members sent a message to a Snapchat group titled "Chi Phi Actives" using language that reduced her to a sexual object available for exploitation. The court filing includes a screenshot of this message as evidence of the defendants' intent and knowledge of what was occurring.

The allegations in the new lawsuit differ substantially from what the victim told police when she reported the assault about a week after it happened. District Attorney Matthew Van Houten acknowledged this discrepancy to ABC News, describing the civil complaint's allegations as "dramatically different" from her original statement. He indicated that his office wants to determine whether new evidence has come to light that would support criminal charges—evidence that was either unknown or unavailable in November 2024, when prosecutors initially decided not to pursue the case.

The victim's account in the lawsuit paints a picture of calculated predation. She claims that when she refused a sexual proposition involving two fraternity members, she was forced to consume ketamine for the first time in her life. Once she was incapacitated, the defendants allegedly began assaulting her without consent. As one man left the room, another entered to continue the abuse. The assault, according to her filing, lasted for hours.

The incident occurred roughly two years after the victim had left her family and moved across the country to attend Cornell. In her lawsuit, she describes arriving at the university with expectations shaped by what she characterizes as a misleading portrayal of Greek life on campus. The evening that led to the assault began innocuously—she was out with her sorority sisters—before she met up with one of the defendants at the fraternity house.

When the victim reported the assault to both campus and Ithaca police in late 2024, the university and the seven accused students were placed on temporary suspension. But no criminal charges were filed at that time. The reopening of the investigation suggests that either the victim has provided additional details, new witnesses have come forward, or other evidence has surfaced that prosecutors believe warrants a second look at whether criminal conduct occurred.

Van Houten told ABC News that his office intends to work with the victim as it prepares to present the case to the grand jury. The grand jury will be asked to determine whether the evidence—old and new—supports criminal charges against the fraternity members. The outcome remains uncertain, but the decision to reopen the investigation signals that prosecutors now believe the allegations merit serious reconsideration.

The allegations in the latest civil complaint are 'dramatically different' than the woman's statement to police in 2024.
— Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten, to ABC News
We want to reexamine whether there's additional evidence that we were not aware of in November of 2024 that exists now that would change our assessment of the case.
— District Attorney Matthew Van Houten
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei The Economic Times ↗
Kontakt FAQ