Protecting Children from Monkeypox at School: Expert Guidance for Parents

The best way to protect children is parents protecting themselves.
An infectious disease specialist explains where household transmission posed the real risk to children.

As American children returned to classrooms in the late summer of 2022, monkeypox cast a shadow of familiar anxiety over families still weary from pandemic vigilance. Yet the data offered a quieter truth: the virus, unlike its predecessors, moved slowly and selectively, demanding direct contact rather than mere proximity. Experts urged parents not toward panic but toward discernment — learning to read a rash, sustaining the hygiene habits already earned through hard years, and understanding that the greatest risk to children lived not in the classroom, but closer to home.

  • A daycare worker's positive test ignited fears that monkeypox could sweep through schools, arriving just as families hoped the era of infectious disease vigilance was easing.
  • The numbers told a different story — fewer than a dozen children infected among more than 11,000 confirmed cases, with over 98% of infections occurring in adult men through intimate contact.
  • Scientists found that monkeypox does not shed enough viable virus in shared spaces like offices or classrooms to meaningfully infect others, making school transmission far less likely than headlines implied.
  • Emergency authorization opened vaccine access to exposed minors, while familiar COVID-era habits — masking, handwashing, staying home when sick — offered parents a practical and proven shield.
  • The real vulnerability for children lay inside the household: a sick parent or caregiver in close daily contact posed a far greater risk than a crowded gymnasium or shared classroom.

When American children returned to school in August 2022, monkeypox had already reached every corner of the country, with more than 11,000 confirmed cases. The news that an Illinois daycare worker had tested positive alarmed parents still carrying the weight of pandemic years. Some infectious disease specialists warned that group settings could become sites of spread.

The actual picture, however, was far less dire. Fewer than twelve children had been infected nationwide, and more than 98 percent of cases involved adult men who contracted the virus through intimate contact. Specialists like Duke University's Ibukun Kalu explained that monkeypox requires direct contact with an infected rash to spread — it does not move through the air the way COVID-19 or common childhood illnesses do. Studies of shared spaces found that infected individuals did not shed enough viable virus to pose meaningful risk to those around them.

A vaccine existed and, under emergency authorization, could be offered to exposed minors. For parents, the protective measures were already familiar: masks in crowded spaces, no sharing of personal items, frequent handwashing, and isolating when sick. Recognizing the rash was essential — lesions began as red bumps that could fill with pus and appear anywhere on the body, sometimes resembling chickenpox or hand, foot, and mouth disease. Fever, swollen lymph nodes, and muscle pain could follow weeks after exposure.

Experts were clear that children were more likely to encounter the virus at home than at school. If a household member became infected, they should isolate in a separate room, cover their rash, and wear a mask. Every pediatric case documented had been linked to household transmission. For older children, close-contact sports and, for teenagers, intimate contact warranted honest, age-appropriate conversations — including frank discussion of monkeypox as a sexually transmissible infection and guidance on reducing risk.

The consensus among specialists was measured: monkeypox in children was extraordinarily rare, but any spreading or unfamiliar rash deserved a doctor's attention, particularly in children under eight, those who were immunocompromised, or those with skin conditions like eczema. The path forward was not alarm, but awareness.

As children across the United States returned to classrooms for the third time since the pandemic began, a different infectious disease was making headlines: monkeypox. By August 2022, nearly every state and territory had reported cases, with more than 11,000 confirmed infections nationwide. The discovery that a daycare worker had tested positive prompted some infectious disease specialists to warn that the virus could spread in group settings like schools and childcare facilities. For parents already exhausted by pandemic precautions, the prospect of another threat loomed.

But the actual risk to children appeared far smaller than the alarm suggested. More than 98 percent of infected people in the United States were adult men who contracted the virus through intimate contact with other men. Fewer than a dozen pediatric cases had been documented. Ibukun Kalu, an infectious disease specialist at Duke University's School of Medicine, explained that monkeypox does not transmit as readily as COVID-19 or common childhood illnesses. The virus typically requires direct contact with an infected person's rash. While the CDC noted that transmission could theoretically occur through contaminated objects, fabrics, or respiratory droplets during close contact, emerging evidence suggested these indirect routes were not significant sources of spread. When someone with monkeypox entered shared spaces like offices or schools, scientists found that the person did not shed enough viable virus to infect others.

A vaccine and treatment existed, though the vaccine was not yet available to the general public. An emergency use authorization now allowed minors under 18 to receive it if they had been exposed or faced elevated risk. For worried parents, the practical measures were reassuringly familiar: masks in crowded indoor spaces, avoiding shared personal items, frequent handwashing, and staying home when sick—the same strategies that had become routine during the COVID years.

Recognizing the rash mattered most. Monkeypox lesions began as red bumps that sometimes swelled and filled with pus, appearing anywhere on the body including the face, hands, feet, and genitals. The rash could resemble chickenpox or hand, foot, and mouth disease, a common childhood illness that circulated during back-to-school season. Kalu advised parents to bring their child to a doctor if a rash began spreading or looked unfamiliar. Other symptoms—fever, headache, muscle pain, swollen lymph nodes, and rectal pain or bleeding—could appear up to three weeks after exposure and last two to four weeks.

Jay Varma, an epidemiologist at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York, acknowledged that as monkeypox continued to spread, more cases would inevitably reach women, children, and pregnant people. Yet for now, children were more likely to contract the virus from someone at home than at school. A child living with an infected household member could, however, carry the virus into a daycare or classroom.

For infants and toddlers in daycare, transmission could theoretically occur through caregivers who kissed or hugged sick children, changed diapers with exposed rashes on their hands, or through contaminated toys and shared bedding. But most daycares already had policies to disinfect toys and surfaces and avoid sharing beds and linens. When the Illinois daycare worker tested positive, no cases appeared among the children or other staff members; all were offered vaccination. Kristina Bryant, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at Norton Children's Hospital in Louisville and a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics' infectious disease committee, stressed that monkeypox was extraordinarily rare in children, especially young ones. Still, parents should take any rash seriously, particularly if it lasted more than a few days or came with fever. Monkeypox could be more severe in children under 8, those who were immunocompromised, or those with skin conditions like eczema.

For school-age children in grades kindergarten through fifth, the same principles applied: keep sick children home, encourage frequent handwashing, and trust that school protocols had improved since COVID. Children this age understood concepts like not touching others and not sharing personal items—strategies that prevented lice and, theoretically, rare cases of monkeypox. Bryant emphasized that parents and adults at home needed to monitor their own health and be willing to discuss the disease with their children in age-appropriate ways. If someone in the household contracted monkeypox, they should isolate in a separate room, wear a well-fitting medical mask, and cover their rash with long sleeves, pants, or gloves. The cases documented in children had been linked to household transmission, so the best protection for kids was parents protecting themselves.

Older children and teenagers faced different considerations. Those participating in close-contact sports like wrestling or activities involving shared uniforms might face higher risk than peers. But this did not mean students should stop these activities. As long as school administrators and parents understood which activities and areas posed transmission potential and communicated clearly with students, the risk could be managed. Parents of teenagers should also begin or continue conversations about sex, proactively mentioning monkeypox since intimate contact—oral, anal, or vaginal sex, as well as kissing and embracing—was now a primary transmission route. While condoms could reduce transmission, they were unlikely to eliminate risk entirely. The CDC offered guidance on safer sex practices, though resources specifically for young adults remained limited.

Monkeypox is extraordinarily rare in children, especially young ones.
— Kristina Bryant, pediatric infectious disease specialist, Norton Children's Hospital
The best way to protect children from monkeypox is that parents protect themselves.
— Kristina Bryant, American Academy of Pediatrics infectious disease committee
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why did monkeypox suddenly become a school concern when the data showed so few children were actually infected?

Model

The Illinois daycare worker tested positive in August, and that triggered alarm because it was the first documented case in a childcare setting. People were still raw from COVID, so any infectious disease near children felt like a potential crisis. But the data told a different story—98 percent of cases were adult men, and fewer than a dozen children had gotten sick.

Inventor

So the risk was real but small.

Model

Exactly. The virus needs direct contact with a rash to spread. You can't catch it from breathing the same air or touching a contaminated doorknob the way you might with COVID. That's a fundamentally different transmission profile.

Inventor

What about the kids who did get infected? How did they catch it?

Model

Every documented pediatric case traced back to household transmission. A child lived with someone who had monkeypox, and that person infected them at home. Not at school, not at daycare—at home.

Inventor

That changes how you think about prevention, doesn't it?

Model

Completely. The best way to protect your child isn't to worry about what happens at school. It's to make sure the adults in your house stay healthy and know how to isolate if they get sick.

Inventor

For teenagers, though, the conversation got more complicated.

Model

Yes, because intimate contact became a transmission route. Parents had to start talking about monkeypox the way they talk about other sexually transmitted concerns—not as fear-mongering, but as part of a broader conversation about their bodies and safety.

Inventor

And the vaccine—was it actually available to kids who needed it?

Model

An emergency authorization allowed minors under 18 to get it if they'd been exposed or were at high risk. But it wasn't available to everyone. It was targeted, which made sense given how rare pediatric cases actually were.

Contact Us FAQ