In a quiet filing that surfaced in court records, the Trump administration has now brought a third set of criminal accusations against James Comey, the former FBI director whom Donald Trump dismissed in 2017 during the bureau's inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 election. The new counts accuse him of directing colleagues to leak national defence information to a reporter over a decade-old story about a surveillance order at Yahoo. Comey, who denies wrongdoing and calls the case retribution, now stands before a federal judge in Washington on a charging route that skipped the grand ju
Comey Faces Third Set of Charges Under Trump, Accused of Leaking National Defence Information
Ten years after the article ran, the government filed charges without a grand jury
What exactly is Comey accused of this time?
Two counts of unlawfully disseminating national defence information. Prosecutors say he directed FBI colleagues to give details to a New York Times reporter about a 2016 story on Yahoo scanning traffic for a computer signature.
Why does it matter that he wasn't indicted?
Prosecutors used a criminal information, which skips the grand jury. His lawyer, Pat Fitzgerald, stresses that no judge or grand jury approved it.
Careful, though. Skipping the grand jury is the lawyer's framing of a legal route. The reporting doesn't say whether the route is improper, only that it's what they used and that the defence objects.
And the claim that it was investigated twice before?
That's Fitzgerald's account. The statement says both times the government decided against charges. We don't have independent confirmation of that.
What is on the record is the pattern: a September 2025 indictment dismissed over Lindsey Halligan's appointment, an April case over the seashell post that is still going, and now this.
Does Comey's retribution argument hold up?
It's his claim. The reporting does show Trump publicly urging Bondi to act against him days before the first indictment. That's context, but it doesn't prove motive in this case, and the court filing's allegations haven't been tested.
The same day, a judge ruled his daughter Maurene was unlawfully fired, which she says was retaliation. That's a separate case with its own finding.
Right, and the ruling there concerned her firing, not these charges.
El Pulso
- Two new national defence counts land on Comey, marking a third government attempt to prosecute him since Trump returned to office.
- Prosecutors bypassed a grand jury by using a criminal information, a move his lawyers call improper and unprecedented in its timing.
- The alleged leak concerns a 2016 New York Times story about Yahoo scanning traffic for a suspected terrorist computer signature.
- Comey's team is pressing for dismissal before Judge Trevor McFadden, while a prior case already collapsed over an unlawful prosecutor appointment.
- Comey vows he is innocent and unafraid, warning that the coming years will be hard for everyone.
In a quiet filing that surfaced in court records, the Trump administration has now brought a third set of criminal accusations against James Comey, the former FBI director whom Donald Trump dismissed in 2017 during the bureau's inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 election. The new counts accuse him of directing colleagues to leak national defence information to a reporter over a decade-old story about a surveillance order at Yahoo. Comey, who denies wrongdoing and calls the case retribution, now stands before a federal judge in Washington on a charging route that skipped the grand jury, a moment that asks whether the machinery of justice can still be trusted to hold its own distance from the politics it serves.
On Monday, sealed court documents revealed that the Trump administration has accused James Comey, the former FBI director, of two counts of unlawfully disseminating national defence information. It is the third time since January 2025 that the government has moved to charge him criminally, and the filing alleges he directed FBI colleagues to leak material to a reporter over a 2016 New York Times article about Yahoo being ordered to scan its traffic for a computer signature linked to a terrorist group.
Comey has not been indicted. Prosecutors used a criminal information, which skips a grand jury, and his lawyer, Pat Fitzgerald, says the government had already investigated the matter twice and concluded no one should be charged. The defence has asked for dismissal, and the case is before Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee.
Comey answered on Substack, calling the effort political retribution and an appalling abuse of the Justice Department. He said he remains innocent, unafraid, and committed to an independent judiciary, and noted that more charges may come. The history stretches back to Trump's 2017 firing of Comey, and includes an earlier case thrown out over an unlawful prosecutor appointment and a second, ongoing case over a seashell photo read as a threat to the president.
The same day, a federal judge ruled that Comey's daughter, Maurene, had been unlawfully fired and was owed reinstatement and backpay, a decision she has tied to retaliation against her father. What comes next is whether the dismissal motion succeeds and whether the court accepts a criminal information in place of a grand jury.
On Monday, sealed court documents came to light showing that the Trump administration has accused James Comey, the former director of the FBI, of two counts of unlawfully disseminating information related to national defence. It is the third time since Donald Trump returned to the presidency in January 2025 that the government has moved to bring criminal charges against Comey.
The filing, dated October, alleges that Comey, acting through one or more co-conspirators, directed a person identified only as Individual #1 to disclose national defence information to a reporter for a national news publication. Prosecutors say Comey ordered FBI colleagues to leak to the news media. The charges concern a New York Times article published on October 5, 2016, about Yahoo being ordered to scan traffic on its site for a specific computer signature allegedly tied to a terrorist organisation. Prosecutors say the information went to Charlie Savage, the reporter on that story.
Comey has not been indicted, and the procedure is part of what is now in dispute. Prosecutors did not take the case to a grand jury, which would have to decide whether to approve charges. They used a mechanism called a criminal information, which lets them bypass that step. Comey's defence lawyer, Pat Fitzgerald, said that ten years after the article ran, the government filed an information that was neither approved by a judge nor issued by a grand jury. He said it purports to charge crimes Comey did not commit. He also said the government had investigated the matter twice before and both times concluded that no one should be charged. Comey's legal team has asked for the charges to be dismissed. Judge Trevor McFadden of the US District Court in Washington, DC, a Trump appointee, is overseeing the case.
Comey responded in a video on Substack, calling the effort political retribution. He said it would almost be funny if it were not such an appalling abuse of the Department of Justice, one that people cannot become numb to. He said nothing had changed: he is innocent, not afraid, and still believes in an independent federal judiciary. He also noted that Trump is only midway through his second term, and suggested more charges may follow. The next couple of years, he said, will be hard for everyone.
The history runs back to 2017, when Trump fired Comey, who had led the FBI since 2013, as the bureau was investigating possible collusion between Russia and Trump's 2016 campaign. Trump has repeatedly called that probe a hoax.
The first case followed a September 2025 social media post in which Trump appeared to urge then-Attorney General Pam Bondi to act against Comey, Senator Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James, writing that they were all guilty and that justice must be served now. Five days later, on September 25, Comey was indicted for lying to Congress and obstructing a legislative proceeding. That case was dismissed because the prosecutor in charge, Lindsey Halligan, had been unlawfully appointed.
A second indictment came on April 28, accusing Comey of threatening the president by posting a photo of seashells arranged to spell "86 47". Forty-seven refers to Trump as the 47th president, and "86" is service-industry slang for throwing out a dish or a customer. The administration argues that "86" implies violence. That case is ongoing.
Also on Monday, before the new charges surfaced, a federal judge in a separate case ruled that Comey's daughter, Maurene Comey, a former assistant US attorney, was unlawfully fired last year. She has maintained that her dismissal was retaliation against her father. The court found she was entitled to retroactive reinstatement and backpay.
What to watch now is whether the dismissal motion succeeds, and whether a judge accepts the use of a criminal information in place of a grand jury indictment.
Citas Notables
Nothing's changed with me. I'm still innocent, and I'm still not afraid of these people.— James Comey, in a Substack video
The government filed an Information that was not approved by a judge nor issued by a grand jury, and charges crimes he did not commit.— Pat Fitzgerald, Comey's defence lawyer (paraphrased)