Colombia's President Moves to Remove Exhibits from National Museum, Drawing Protests and Trump Comparisons

A cultural battle that probably doesn't exist
Political scientist Estefania Cardozo described the government's campaign outside the National Museum in Bogota.
Mark

What actually changed at the National Museum?

Mimi

Dozens of exhibits were taken down after the president announced his "counterrevolution" last week. They covered feminist and LGBTQ activism, other social movements, and Colombia's political violence.

Mark

And the government's stated reason?

Mimi

De la Espriella says he wants to keep cultural institutions from being taken over by what he calls "atheist social communism."

Luke

That's his framing. The reporting doesn't say who decided which exhibits went, or by what criteria. We know what was removed, not how the choices were made.

Mark

Why are people comparing this to Trump?

Mimi

Trump has attacked Smithsonian museums. In July the White House branded leaders of the American History museum as radical activists. Analysts like Sanchez-Garzoli see Trump allies borrowing those strategies.

Luke

Worth noting that's her reading and that of other critics. The government hasn't been quoted here accepting the comparison. And in the US case, the signs still aren't up almost three months on.

Mark

Is it just one museum?

Mimi

No. Holguin says other museums are being reviewed and redesigned, and a foreign ministry courtyard honoring an Indigenous leader was renamed.

Luke

Reviewing and redesigning isn't the same as removing. How far it goes is still unknown.

  • Exhibits on feminist, LGBTQ and political violence history have come down from the National Museum in Bogota within days of the president's announcement.
  • Riot police guarded the entrance as dozens of protesters rallied outside, accusing the government of censorship and erasing Black, Indigenous and LGBTQ history.
  • Culture Minister Paola Holguin is reviewing and redesigning exhibitions at other museums, and a foreign ministry courtyard honoring an Indigenous leader has been renamed.
  • Critics link the campaign to Trump-style culture wars and the Smithsonian dispute, and the review of other museums suggests more exhibit changes and protests are still ahead.

On a Wednesday in Bogota, demonstrators gathered in the cold shadow of riot police to mourn the quiet disappearance of stories from the National Museum, where displays on feminist, LGBTQ and political-violence history had been taken down. The removals follow President Abelardo de la Espriella's declared 'counterrevolution' against cultural institutions he sees as shaped by atheist social communism. Thoughtful observers note that the impulse echoes the culture wars of Washington, suggesting a memory contested not only within Colombia but across the currents that connect the Americas. Whether a nation's past can be edited by decree remains the question the protesters have carried to the museum steps.

On Wednesday, dozens of demonstrators stood outside the National Museum in downtown Bogota while riot police kept watch over the entrance. They had come to protest the removal of exhibits from inside, following President Abelardo de la Espriella's announcement that he is leading a cultural "counterrevolution."

The president, a far-right conservative and ally of Donald Trump, says he wants to keep cultural institutions from being taken over by what he calls "atheist social communism." Since his announcement, displays on feminist and LGBTQ activism and on Colombia's political violence have come down. Artists, students and civil rights groups have responded with protests, warning that parts of the national past are being erased. History student Azul Riascos said the government is promoting an image of Colombia as exclusively white, Catholic and Spanish-speaking, leaving out Black, Indigenous and LGBTQ communities.

The campaign reaches beyond one museum. Culture Minister Paola Holguin says her ministry is reviewing other museums it oversees, and the Foreign Ministry has renamed a courtyard that honored an Indigenous leader as part of the fight against "woke" ideology.

Critics see an imported script. Analysts at the Washington Office on Latin America say the approach mirrors Trump allies copying US narratives, and anthropologist Arturo Sanabria called it a form of neocolonial intervention. The comparison points to Trump's dispute with the Smithsonian, where a White House report ordered warning signs placed outside an American history museum; nearly three months later, those signs have not gone up. Political scientist Estefania Cardozo argued that the government is inventing a cultural battle in order to erase identities that already exist. With more reviews under way, further changes and protests appear likely.

On Wednesday, dozens of demonstrators stood outside the National Museum in downtown Bogota while riot police guarded the entrance. They had come to protest the removal of exhibits from inside, a move that follows an announcement by Colombian President Abelardo de la Espriella that he is leading a cultural "counterrevolution."

De la Espriella, a far-right conservative and ally of United States President Donald Trump, said last week that he wants to stop cultural institutions from being taken over by what he calls "atheist social communism." Since then, dozens of exhibits have come down. Among them were displays on the history of social movements, including feminist and LGBTQ activism, and on Colombia's political violence.

Civil rights groups, artists and students have responded with protests, accusing the government of censorship and warning that important parts of the country's history could be erased. Azul Riascos, a history student, called it outrageous that anyone would try to erase part of the national past. He said the government is promoting a picture of Colombia as exclusively white, Catholic and Spanish-speaking, an image that leaves out Black, Indigenous and LGBTQ communities.

The campaign extends beyond a single museum. Culture Minister Paola Holguin said her ministry is reviewing and redesigning exhibitions and curatorial practices at other museums it oversees. Separately, Colombia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs renamed a courtyard that had honored an Indigenous leader, describing the change as part of the president's fight against "woke" ideology.

Critics see an imported script. Gimena Sanchez-Garzoli, the Andes director at the Washington Office on Latin America, a research and advocacy organisation, said the approach reflects a wider pattern of Trump allies copying US political narratives and strategies. She added that Trump's cooperation with allied Latin American governments on security and counternarcotics also carries an ideological dimension. Anthropologist Arturo Sanabria, speaking at the protest, said these are imported narratives about terrorism and about being "woke," and described the approach as a form of neocolonial intervention.

The comparison points to Trump's own dispute with Washington museums, especially those tied to the Smithsonian Institution. In July, the White House released a report branding leaders of the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History as radical activists and ordered signs placed outside the museum telling visitors some exhibits are inaccurate. Nearly three months later, those signs have not been installed. The museum's director, Anthea Hartig, told Congress the report "does not fairly or accurately characterise the full body of work at the museum."

Political scientist Estefania Cardozo, also outside the museum on Wednesday, argued that the government is waging a cultural battle that probably does not exist. In her view, it is inventing one in order to erase identities that cannot be erased because they already exist.

With Holguin's review of other museums under way, further changes to exhibitions appear likely, and the protests may follow them.

I find it outrageous that they want to erase part of our history.
— Azul Riascos, history student
The government is making serious efforts in a cultural battle that probably doesn't exist.
— Estefania Cardozo, political scientist
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Al Jazeera ↗
Contáctanos FAQ