Colombian guerrillas who disarmed face uncertain fate under hardline new president

99 disarmed combatants face potential arrest or military action; separation from families during transition; broader context of Colombian armed conflict claiming nearly 500,000 lives over six decades.
We're keeping our side of the bargain. The government should do the same.
A nineteen-year-old former fighter warns he would resume armed activity if the government abandons its commitments to the disarmed group.
Mark

So these ninety-nine people actually gave up their weapons. That's real, verifiable—they handed them over in June?

Mimi

Yes. It happened. Ninety-nine fighters, one by one, turned in rifles, pistols, machine guns, grenade launchers. The weapons were burned. It was meant to be symbolic, a real break.

Luke

But it happened three days before an election the government was going to lose. That's worth naming—the timing wasn't accidental.

Mimi

Right. Petro's administration was trying to show the peace plan was working, that disarmament was possible. But the election was already decided in the polls.

Mark

And now they're stuck in this transition zone. What's their actual legal status?

Mimi

Suspended. Their arrest warrants are technically suspended. They're protected by a decree that runs until December 25. After that, nothing is guaranteed.

Luke

So the new president could revoke the decree tomorrow and they'd be unprotected. That's not protection—that's a temporary reprieve.

Mimi

Exactly. And there's no legal framework in Colombian law for their transition. Petro's administration tried to pass amnesty proposals through Congress. They all failed.

Mark

What about the money they were supposed to get? The reintegration support?

Mimi

Four hundred twenty-five pounds a month. It hasn't been paid. They're living in government buildings, fed, but without the financial support that was supposed to help them rebuild.

Luke

And the broader group—the CNEB, the larger organization these ninety-nine came from—they're still armed?

Mimi

Yes. The ninety-nine were the only ones to disarm. The rest of the CNEB, maybe twenty-five hundred members, still have their weapons. And their chief negotiator was just ordered extradited.

Mark

So the new president is signaling he's done with negotiation.

Mimi

Completely. He's already begun airstrikes against criminal groups. He campaigned on ending "total peace" and returning to military operations.

Luke

One thing I want to be clear on: we don't know if De la Espriella will actually move against the ninety-nine. He hasn't said. The threat is real because he could, but we shouldn't report it as if it's decided.

Mimi

Fair. What we know is that the protection is temporary and the president has made clear he opposes the entire framework that created it.

Mark

And some of them have said they'd take up arms again if abandoned?

Mimi

At least one, a nineteen-year-old named Adrián, said that directly. If the government breaks its side of the bargain, he'd resume fighting.

Luke

Which is a warning, not a prediction. But it matters—it shows the fragility of what was supposed to be irreversible.

Mimi

That's the whole story, really. Ninety-nine people tried to step out of a war. Now they're waiting to see if the country will let them.

  • Ninety-nine fighters surrendered their weapons, uniforms, and former lives in a ceremony meant to mark a new beginning — but the peace they stepped toward is now being dismantled from above.
  • A presidential decree shielding them from arrest expires on Christmas Day, and the new government has neither confirmed nor denied whether it will extend their protection or revoke it without warning.
  • The former official who brokered their disarmament has resigned after the peace infrastructure was absorbed into a security commission, stripping away the institutional advocates who might have fought for them.
  • Their chief negotiator has been extradited to the United States, severing a key link between the disarmed group and any remaining leverage with the armed faction they left behind.
  • Some fighters, including the group's youngest member, have warned they would return to armed struggle if the state abandons its commitments — a warning that carries the weight of a conflict that has never truly ended.
  • Legal experts and former officials caution that a military operation against an unarmed group in a government-controlled zone would cross the threshold into a crime against humanity.

In the long arc of Colombia's six-decade armed conflict, ninety-nine guerrilla fighters chose to lay down their weapons in an act of faith — only to find the political ground shift beneath them days later. Disarming under former president Petro's 'total peace' initiative just before a decisive election, they now inhabit a legal and moral no-man's-land as the incoming hardline government of Abelardo De la Espriella signals no intention to honor the framework that brought them in from the jungle. Their story is not merely one of policy failure, but of what happens when human lives become collateral in the collision between competing visions of how a wounded society heals itself.

In mid-June, ninety-nine guerrilla fighters were airlifted to a remote settlement in southern Colombia, where they surrendered their weapons to government officials and watched their uniforms and equipment burn. It was the only group to actually disarm under former president Gustavo Petro's sweeping 'total peace' initiative — a plan to bring Colombia's estimated thirty thousand armed fighters into negotiated settlements. The timing could not have been worse. They laid down their arms three days before a presidential runoff that brought Abelardo De la Espriella to power, a far-right lawyer who had campaigned explicitly on ending Petro's peace efforts and returning to military force.

Weeks into the new presidency, the ninety-nine remain in a government-controlled transition zone in rural Colombia, living under surveillance in brick buildings painted with doves of peace, soldiers stationed less than a mile away. They eat together, exercise in improvised gyms, and spend much of their time on their phones. Their legal protection rests on a presidential decree set to expire December 25. De la Espriella has said his government will not negotiate peace agreements and has not publicly addressed what he intends to do with the group. He could revoke their protection at any time.

The human stakes are intimate and immediate. Natalia Bríñez, twenty-nine, has not seen her two children in person since entering the zone, speaking to them only by video call. Monthly financial support she was promised has not arrived. The group has written to De la Espriella reaffirming their commitment to peace and inviting him to visit — the letter went unanswered. Meanwhile, the institutional scaffolding around them has collapsed: the Office of the High Commissioner for Peace has been absorbed into a new security body, and the official who led their negotiations has resigned.

Their situation is further complicated by the fact that no legal framework exists to secure their civilian transition. All of Petro's legislative proposals to regulate surrenders failed in Congress, and current law bars amnesty for those convicted of crimes like kidnapping or drug trafficking. Researchers describe them as existing in genuine legal limbo — protected only by decrees that can be revoked, with no path to civilian life formally guaranteed. Adrián, the group's youngest member at nineteen, captured the fragile bargain plainly: he wants a home and a family, but acknowledged that if the government walks away, he would take up arms again. The disarmament that was meant to open a new chapter in Colombia's long war now hangs suspended between two irreconcilable political visions, with ninety-nine unarmed people caught in between.

In mid-June, ninety-nine guerrilla fighters arrived by helicopter at a remote settlement in southern Colombia. One by one, they stepped forward and placed their weapons on the ground—rifles, pistols, machine guns, grenade launchers—handing them to government officials. They removed their tactical vests, field packs, and camouflage uniforms and watched as the pile was set ablaze. It was meant to be a beginning: the end of their involvement in a conflict that has killed nearly half a million people over six decades.

They were the sole group to actually disarm under former president Gustavo Petro's "total peace" initiative, an ambitious plan to negotiate with and disarm all of Colombia's criminal organizations, estimated to number nearly 30,000 fighters. But the timing proved catastrophic. The ninety-nine laid down their arms just three days before a presidential runoff election. The winner was Abelardo de la Espriella, a far-right millionaire lawyer who had campaigned explicitly on dismantling Petro's peace efforts and returning to a strategy of military operations and incarceration.

Now, weeks into De la Espriella's presidency and amid his government's response to a 7.4-magnitude earthquake, the ninety-nine remain in legal suspension. They occupy a government-controlled transition zone, or ZUT, in a rural area where they live under surveillance in beige brick buildings decorated with hand-painted doves of peace. Soldiers guard the perimeter less than a mile away. They are fed three meals daily in a communal hall. One former combatant constructed a makeshift gym from metal pipes and cement-filled tins. There is an improvised football pitch. Most spend their days on their phones. Natalia Bríñez, twenty-nine, one of thirteen women in the group, described their condition plainly: "We're in limbo."

Their protection rests on a presidential decree that expires on December 25. De la Espriella has said repeatedly that his government will not negotiate peace agreements. He has not announced what he intends to do with the ninety-nine, and his office has not responded to requests for comment. Theoretically, any arrest warrants against them remain suspended, and they stay under state protection until the decree's expiration. But the president could revoke it at any time. Armando Novoa, the former government official who led negotiations with the group, warned that "the worst-case scenario would be for the new government to close the ZUT, launch a military operation and try to capture or kill them. That would be a crime against humanity, because these people are unarmed." Novoa has since resigned after the Office of the High Commissioner for Peace was absorbed into a newly created National Security Commission, a restructuring expected to eliminate more than two hundred jobs.

The ninety-nine represent a fraction of a larger armed faction called the Commandos of the Frontier, most of whom remain armed. They are part of the National Coordinator of the Bolivarian Army, or CNEB, a former dissident faction of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia with approximately twenty-five hundred members that controls the border with Ecuador. The CNEB's chief negotiator, known as "Araña" or Spider, had been in custody since February on a U.S. extradition request for drug trafficking—a process Petro had delayed. De la Espriella ordered his extradition last week.

Bríñez, who has a phoenix tattoo on her left shoulder as a symbol of rebirth, has not seen her seven-year-old daughter and ten-year-old son in person since entering the zone. She speaks to them on video calls but cannot visit until her transition is complete, a process that includes vocational training and psychosocial support. She was supposed to receive financial support of approximately four hundred twenty-five pounds monthly, which has not yet been paid. In the meantime, some of the group were planning to start a chicken-rearing business. Paula Tobo, a senior researcher at the Ideas for Peace Foundation, noted that the ninety-nine exist in "legal limbo" because their protection depends on decrees that can be revoked and there is no legal framework for their civilian transition. All of Petro's administration proposals to regulate surrenders failed in Congress, and under current law, anyone who has committed crimes such as kidnapping or drug trafficking is ineligible for amnesty.

The group wrote a letter to De la Espriella reaffirming their "irreversible decision to commit to peace" and inviting him to visit. It received no response. Adrián, the youngest member at nineteen, said the group wanted "to have a home, a family." But he also acknowledged what might happen if the government abandons them. "Honestly, I'd take up arms again, because we're keeping our side of the bargain and the government should do the same, shouldn't it?" The disarmament that was meant to signal a new chapter in Colombia's long conflict now hangs suspended between two incompatible political visions, with the ninety-nine caught in the space between.

The worst-case scenario would be for the new government to close the ZUT, launch a military operation and try to capture or kill them. That would be a crime against humanity, because these people are unarmed.
— Armando Novoa, former government peace negotiator
The hardest thing for me has been being away from my children. I speak to them on video calls, but will only be able to see them in person once my transition is complete.
— Natalia Bríñez, 29, one of the disarmed fighters
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur The Guardian ↗
Nous contacter FAQ