Girls treated as merchandise in hostile conditions
The Ombudsman's Office documented 161 trafficking cases this year, with 155 involving girls, adolescents, and women, revealing gender-based violence as structural. 70% of cases concentrate in Norte de Santander, La Guajira, and border regions controlled by armed groups, where poverty, migration, and state absence enable criminal networks.
- 240 projected trafficking cases by year-end, a 19% increase
- 155 of 161 documented cases involve girls, adolescents, and women
- 84% of victims from lowest two economic strata
- 70% of cases concentrated in Norte de Santander and border regions
- 80% of cases involve sexual exploitation
Colombia faces a human trafficking crisis with cases projected to reach 240 by year-end, a 19% increase, with 84% of victims from low-income populations and 80% exploited sexually.
Colombia is on track to record 240 human trafficking cases by the end of the year—a nineteen percent jump from the previous twelve months. The projection comes from the Ombudsman's Office, which presented the figures at the Second International Congress Against Human Trafficking in Cartagena. What makes the numbers even more stark is not just their size, but the profile of those being trafficked: eighty-four percent come from the poorest economic strata, and the vast majority are girls and young women.
So far this year, the Ombudsman's Office has documented one hundred sixty-one trafficking cases. Of those, one hundred fifty-five involve girls, adolescents, and women as direct victims. The Ombudsman, Iris Marín, framed this plainly: human trafficking and the commercial sexual exploitation of children and adolescents represents a human rights crisis rooted in inequality and exclusion. Sexual exploitation dominates the criminal purpose—it accounts for eighty percent of the cases the office has accompanied. The gender dimension is unmistakable. This is not random violence; it is systematic violence against women and girls, enabled by poverty and the absence of state protection.
The geography of trafficking tells its own story. Seventy percent of documented cases concentrate in Norte de Santander, followed by La Guajira, Antioquia, Nariño, and Quindío. These are regions where armed illegal groups—the ELN, the Clan del Golfo, dissident factions of the former FARC—exercise territorial control. The Ombudsman's Office has issued forty-seven early warning alerts between 2022 and 2025. The most recent, issued in 2024, warned of enslavement risks facing women, LGBTIQ+ persons, ethnic communities, and migrants under the control of these groups in areas like Catatumbo and border municipalities including Cúcuta, Puerto Santander, and Villa del Rosario. Migration—both internal displacement and movement across the Venezuelan border—combined with the state's absence in peripheral territories, creates the conditions where criminal networks recruit victims and treat them as commodities.
But the crisis extends beyond the street and the border. Recent investigations have revealed that child sexual exploitation operates as an industry worth billions of dollars, benefiting not only organized crime but also legitimate businesses that profit directly or indirectly from these grave rights violations. The Ombudsman's Office is calling for corporate accountability: companies must move beyond statements of disagreement and conduct due diligence in their supply chains, closing spaces where trafficking can occur within their operations. The fight, in other words, is also a financial one.
Trafficking has infiltrated everyday life and digital spaces. It no longer confines itself to tourist zones. It operates in neighborhood shops, at public events, in shelters, and in invisible digital networks that have become primary tools for recruiting girls and adolescents. A deeper cultural current runs beneath this: the persistent idea that women exist only as reproductive or sexual subjects, which enables the reduction of their bodies to commodities and justifies this structural violence.
International scrutiny has intensified. The U.S. State Department's most recent annual report on human trafficking places Colombia at Tier Two—acknowledging significant efforts but flagging critical gaps: persistent underreporting of victims, limited prosecution of labor trafficking cases, insufficient penalties for complicit officials, and inadequate attention to adult victims. These findings align with the Ombudsman's warnings and underscore the need for the justice system to move beyond prosecuting intermediaries. The real work requires identifying and prosecuting both independent traffickers and organized networks, recognizing and punishing complicity with other criminal activities and the financial structures that masquerade as legitimate business.
The challenge is constitutional. Colombia is obligated to eradicate these extreme violations, which breach the rights to dignity, equality, and non-discrimination. Ethnic communities bear particular weight—the Nukak people of San José del Guaviare, for instance, have seen their children treated as merchandise in hostile conditions. Congress faces a fundamental task: updating the 2005 Anti-Trafficking Law to address transnational criminal cartels, emerging forms of exploitation like illegal adoption and forced pregnancy, and digital methods that multiply risk. The National Police announced during the congress that Interpol will establish a headquarters in Cartagena, equipping the city with international intelligence tools to combat the transnational criminality that uses the Colombian Caribbean as an operational platform. The infrastructure is being built. Whether it will be enough remains an open question.
Notable Quotes
Human trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation of children represents a human rights crisis rooted in inequality and exclusion.— Iris Marín, Ombudsman of Colombia
Trafficking and sexual exploitation share circuits of recruitment, coercion, and exploitation, sustained by poverty, forced migration, and state absence.— Iris Marín, Ombudsman of Colombia
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Why does the source material keep emphasizing that eighty-four percent of victims come from the poorest strata? Is that just a statistic, or does it point to something structural?
It's structural. Poverty doesn't cause trafficking—criminals cause trafficking. But poverty removes the buffers that protect people: education, family stability, access to information, trust in institutions. A girl in a poor neighborhood has fewer options, fewer people watching out for her, fewer places to turn if something goes wrong. The traffickers know this. They're not random; they're strategic.
The piece mentions that seventy percent of cases are in Norte de Santander and border regions. What makes those places different?
Armed groups control those territories. They don't just traffic people—they control the entire ecosystem. They decide who moves, who works, who survives. When the state is absent and an illegal armed group fills that vacuum, trafficking becomes just another revenue stream, like drug trafficking or extortion. It's normalized.
The source talks about legitimate businesses profiting from exploitation. How does that work? Are we talking about hotels, restaurants?
The document doesn't name specific industries, but yes—anywhere money moves and oversight is weak. Hotels, bars, agriculture, construction, domestic work. The point is that trafficking isn't just a criminal underworld problem. It's embedded in the legal economy. A company might not know its supply chain includes trafficked labor, or it might not want to know. That's why the Ombudsman is calling for due diligence—companies need to actually look.
The piece mentions digital networks as recruitment tools. Is that new?
It's not entirely new, but it's accelerating. Social media, messaging apps, online marketplaces—they're all being weaponized for recruitment. A girl sees an ad for a job or a relationship online, and by the time she realizes what's happening, she's already been moved or isolated. It's faster, cheaper, and harder to trace than traditional methods.
What does it mean that the U.S. placed Colombia at Tier Two instead of Tier One?
Tier Two means Colombia is trying but falling short. It's a warning. The U.S. is saying: you have the laws, you have some institutions working on this, but you're not prosecuting the big players, you're not protecting adult victims adequately, and you're not holding your own officials accountable when they're complicit. It's a diplomatic way of saying the system isn't working at scale.