Outside Chicago, the stewards of college football moved quietly toward a decision that would unmoor the sport from one of its oldest truths: that a loss in October can end a championship dream. A 24-team playoff, now nearly certain, would welcome teams with three and four defeats into the national title conversation, dissolving conference championships and softening the stakes that once made the college football regular season singular among American sports. The change is not driven by competitive philosophy but by the gravitational pull of broadcast revenue, and it arrives with a speed that s
College Football Moves to 24-Team Playoff, Threatening Regular Season Significance
Losses no longer carry the weight they once did when only four teams could advance.
Mark
So the 24-team playoff is basically done?
Mimi
The executives met outside Chicago this week and it sounds like they've worked through the structural questions. Rich Clark was confident enough to explain how it would actually work—eight first-round games two weeks after the regular season, eight more in late December. The money is the last piece, but there's a "confident stakeholder" saying if the TV deal materializes, it's happening.
Luke
But "all but certain" isn't certain. We're hearing from one executive and one unnamed stakeholder. That's not nothing, but it's not a vote either.
Mimi
Fair. But the momentum is real. They moved from four teams to 12 in just a few years. The pattern is clear.
Mark
What actually dies with this?
Mimi
Conference championships, for one. They're gone—the first-round games start one week after the current championship window. Traditional bowl games become irrelevant. And the regular season loses its teeth. Three-loss teams will make the playoff. Probably four-loss teams too.
Luke
Will they? The source says "near certainty" and "all but dead," but those are predictions, not facts yet. We don't know the actual selection criteria for 24 teams.
Mark
But if you're a program and you know losses don't eliminate you, why schedule Ohio State?
Mimi
Exactly. Steve Sarkisian made that point in 2025 when Texas lost to Ohio State and missed the playoff. He called it a "disservice" and said Texas might reevaluate its schedule. After Texas won in 2026, he had a different tone, but the logic didn't change.
Luke
Though to be fair, Texas did play Ohio State. And the source mentions ratings are down and stadiums aren't full. So there's still incentive to draw fans with big games.
Mark
So it could go either way.
Mimi
It could. But the default incentive now points toward easier schedules. That's the shift.
Luke
And we should be clear: this is being driven by money, not by what anyone actually wanted. The source says few fans asked for a 24-team playoff.
Mark
So why are they doing it?
Mimi
Revenue. More games, more broadcast rights fees. That's the whole story.
Il Polso
- What began as a four-team playoff in 2014 has accelerated through 12 teams and is now lunging toward 24 — a transformation spanning barely a decade that would have seemed unthinkable at the sport's founding.
- Conference championships, long the crowning ritual of the regular season, would be eliminated entirely, erasing a layer of competition that gave regional rivalries their highest stakes.
- A stakeholder close to the negotiations made the governing logic explicit: if the television money arrives, expansion to 24 is not a question of if but when.
- Coaches like Texas's Steve Sarkisian have already begun calculating whether scheduling elite non-conference opponents is worth the risk when a three-loss record can still earn a playoff berth.
- Ratings are falling, historic programs are struggling to fill seats, and the sport's answer is more playoff games — a remedy that may deepen the very disenchantment it hopes to cure.
Outside Chicago, the stewards of college football moved quietly toward a decision that would unmoor the sport from one of its oldest truths: that a loss in October can end a championship dream. A 24-team playoff, now nearly certain, would welcome teams with three and four defeats into the national title conversation, dissolving conference championships and softening the stakes that once made the college football regular season singular among American sports. The change is not driven by competitive philosophy but by the gravitational pull of broadcast revenue, and it arrives with a speed that suggests the sport's identity is being renegotiated faster than most of its followers have noticed.
College football's power brokers gathered outside Chicago this week and moved the sport to the edge of a fundamental transformation: a 24-team playoff that would end conference championships, dilute the regular season, and all but guarantee that teams with three or four losses compete for a national title.
The pace of change is striking. The College Football Playoff launched as a four-team field in 2014, held that shape for a decade through considerable controversy, then expanded to 12 teams. Now, barely settled into that format, the sport is preparing another leap. Rich Clark, the playoff's executive director, described a structure in which eight first-round games begin two weeks after the regular season — essentially absorbing the week once reserved for conference title games, which would cease to exist. Eight second-round games would follow in late December, likely hosted by higher seeds. The financial logic is straightforward: a television deal, with ESPN or another partner, makes it viable, and as one stakeholder put it, if the money comes through, expansion is certain.
The competitive consequences are harder to dismiss. When a four-loss team can reach the playoff, a November defeat between rivals becomes a scheduling footnote rather than a season-defining moment. The regular season, widely regarded as the best in American sports precisely because every game carried consequence, loses the mechanism that made it so.
The incentive structure bends in troubling directions. Texas coach Steve Sarkisian, after his team lost to Ohio State in 2025 and missed the playoff, openly questioned whether scheduling elite opponents was worth the risk. He won a championship in 2026 and softened his tone — but the underlying calculation remained. An 8-4 record with a playoff berth is worth more, institutionally, than a 7-5 record without one. Programs will eventually schedule accordingly.
What the Chicago meetings produced is a sport that has chosen revenue over competitive integrity with unusual candor. Conference championships are gone. The regular season's sorting function is diminished. Fan preference, by all accounts, has settled near the bottom of the decision hierarchy. The result, somewhere in the near future, will be a first-round playoff game between two eight-win teams — and the sport will present it as expansion.
College football's power brokers gathered outside Chicago this week with a decision that amounts to a quiet demolition of the sport's oldest competitive principle: that losses matter. A 24-team playoff expansion is now all but certain, according to multiple reports from the meetings, and with it comes the end of conference championships, the hollowing out of the regular season, and the near-guarantee that teams with three or four losses will play for a national title.
The speed of this transformation is staggering. The first College Football Playoff, a four-team format selected by committee, began in 2014. For a decade it held steady, despite controversy—most notably Florida State's exclusion in 2023. That exclusion, combined with the discovery of a vast revenue opportunity in additional playoff games, prompted the move to 12 teams just a few years ago. Now, barely into that era, the sport is preparing to leap to 24.
Rich Clark, the executive director overseeing the format, outlined the mechanics with apparent confidence. Eight first-round games would begin two weeks after the regular season ends, essentially one week after the current conference championship window. That window itself would vanish. Eight second-round games would follow in late December, most likely played at the home stadium of the lower seed. The money, Clark and others suggested, will materialize through a television deal—ESPN or another partner. A stakeholder quoted by Yahoo!'s Ross Dellenger put it plainly: if the money comes through, "we are definitely going to 24."
What this means in practice is the near-certain end of traditional bowl games as meaningful destinations. More consequentially, it means the regular season will no longer function as a sorting mechanism for excellence. A three-loss team will make the playoff. A four-loss team almost certainly will too. In an era of superconferences where strength of schedule alone can carry weaker records into contention, those close losses between rivals—the games that once defined a season's narrative—become mere scheduling entries. A loss to a top program no longer carries the weight it did when only four or twelve teams could advance.
There is a secondary effect worth considering. If losses no longer carry the same penalty, programs may become more willing to schedule high-profile non-conference opponents, betting that even a defeat won't derail their tournament hopes. Texas coach Steve Sarkisian made this calculation explicit in 2025 when his team lost to Ohio State and missed the playoff entirely. He called it a "disservice" to the sport and suggested Texas might recalibrate its schedule toward easier paths. After winning the championship in 2026, his tone shifted, but the underlying logic remained: why risk losses against elite programs if the margin for error has widened so dramatically?
Yet even as some programs might gamble on marquee matchups to fill stadiums, the broader incentive structure points the other direction. Ratings are declining in 2026. Traditional powerhouses like Penn State are struggling to sell out. In a landscape of rising ticket prices and infinite entertainment options, teams will package season tickets around the promise of seeing big games—but they will also, inevitably, schedule opponents they can beat. The math is simple: an 8-4 record with a playoff berth beats a 7-5 record without one.
What emerges from these meetings is a sport that has chosen revenue over competitive integrity with unusual clarity. Conference championships, which carried bragging rights and historical weight, are gone. The regular season, long considered the best in American sports, will be fundamentally altered. Few fans asked for this. But as the reporting makes clear, what fans prefer has already fallen to the bottom of the decision-making hierarchy, and it continues to sink. Somewhere in the near future, an 8-4 Missouri team will face an 8-4 Wisconsin team in a playoff first round, and the sport will call it progress.
Citazioni salienti
We've worked through a lot of the other issues associated with a 24-team expansion and those things needed to happen before we started any kind of negotiation over money.— Rich Clark, executive director
If the money materializes through a TV deal, we are definitely going to 24.— Unnamed stakeholder
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su Fox News ↗