Clancy murder trial ends in mistrial as hung jury deadlocks after 36 hours

Three children—Cora (5), Dawson (3), and Callan (8 months)—were killed in January 2023; Clancy is paralyzed and in a wheelchair after jumping from a window the night of the killings.
I hope that guy can sleep well at night.
Clancy's attorney on the lone juror who refused to apply the law on reasonable doubt, holding out against eleven others voting for acquittal.
Mark

So one juror held out against eleven others who wanted acquittal. That's unusual, isn't it?

Mimi

It is. And what made it worse was that this juror apparently told the others he understood the law on reasonable doubt but simply would not apply it. That's different from disagreeing about the facts.

Luke

But we should be careful here. We know from Reddington's account that eleven jurors said one person wouldn't listen to the law. We don't have the holdout juror's side of the story. He might say he was applying the law as he understood it to the facts he saw.

Mimi

That's fair. But the judge had already instructed the jury on reasonable doubt using the state's own language. The question became whether someone can just refuse to follow a lawful instruction.

Mark

And the judge refused to remove him?

Mimi

Yes. Judge Sullivan said it was the juror's duty to accept the law as given. He wouldn't do a further inquiry, even when Reddington asked him to be more forceful about it.

Luke

Which raises a real question: at what point does a juror's refusal to apply the law become grounds for removal? The judge seemed to think disagreement with others wasn't enough. Reddington disagreed.

Mark

So Clancy might face trial again?

Mimi

That's up to the district attorney. He said Friday he hadn't decided yet. But yes, a mistrial doesn't end the case—it just means they can start over.

Luke

And we should note: eleven jurors leaning toward acquittal is significant, but it's not a verdict. It's a hung jury. We don't know if those eleven would have held firm or if they were just closer to reasonable doubt than the twelfth.

Mark

What about Clancy herself? How is she handling this?

Mimi

Her attorney said she's "not good." She's paralyzed, in a wheelchair, and has been in psychiatric care since the night she jumped from a window after the children died. The prospect of reliving this through another trial is devastating for her and her family.

Luke

And for the jurors too, apparently. Some of them were visibly upset when the mistrial was declared.

  • After thirty-six hours of deliberation, eleven jurors were ready to acquit, but one man refused to follow the judge's instructions on reasonable doubt — a deadlock so entrenched it prompted an emergency appeal to Massachusetts's highest court, which was rejected within minutes.
  • The mistrial declaration at 2:23 p.m. broke open the courtroom's composure: a juror in her fifties collapsed with her face in her hands, others wept, and defense attorney Kevin Reddington told reporters the holdout had 'robbed' eleven attentive jurors of seven weeks of their lives.
  • The morning had already been fractious — Reddington demanded the holdout be removed for allegedly lying under oath, and Judge Sullivan, refusing, snapped back: 'What do you want me to do? Get a brass band? I'm not an actor.'
  • Lindsay Clancy, now paralyzed and in a wheelchair, returns to Tewksbury State Hospital, while District Attorney Tim Cruz weighs whether to retry her on first-degree murder, pursue lesser charges, or let the case go — a decision he declined to make the day of the mistrial.
  • Patrick Clancy, who discovered his children that night, called the prospect of another trial 'extraordinarily painful,' and civil attorneys representing Lindsay Clancy vowed to pursue the medical providers they hold responsible for the conditions that preceded the tragedy.

In a Plymouth, Massachusetts courtroom on a Friday afternoon in September 2026, a mistrial was declared in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy — a mother paralyzed by her own hand the night her three young children died — after a jury of twelve spent thirty-six hours unable to agree, deadlocked eleven to one for acquittal. The single holdout's refusal to apply the law on reasonable doubt, despite repeated judicial instruction, brought a seven-week trial to an inconclusive end, leaving justice suspended between competing truths about culpability, mental illness, and the limits of human judgment. The case — rooted in the January 2023 deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan Clancy in their Duxbury home — now returns to the hands of a district attorney who must decide whether to carry the weight of it again.

A mistrial was declared Friday in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy after a jury of twelve spent thirty-six hours deadlocked — eleven in favor of acquittal, one holdout refusing to apply the judge's instructions on reasonable doubt. In a last attempt to salvage the verdict, defense attorney Kevin Reddington filed an emergency appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to have the juror removed. The court rejected it within minutes. At 2:23 p.m., Plymouth Superior Court Judge William Sullivan declared the mistrial, ending seven weeks of proceedings without resolution.

Clancy, now paralyzed and confined to a wheelchair after jumping from a window the night her children died, had pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in the deaths of five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson, and eight-month-old Callan at their Duxbury home on January 24, 2023. Prosecutors argued she acted with premeditation and full knowledge of right and wrong. The defense conceded she killed her children but maintained she bore no criminal responsibility — that she was overmedicated and in the grip of a postpartum mental health crisis. That question of culpability, not of action, appears to have been the fault line that fractured the jury.

The weight of the deadlock was visible in the courtroom. A female juror collapsed forward, face in her hands, when the mistrial was announced; two others wiped away tears. Reddington, barely containing his frustration, told reporters the holdout had 'robbed' eleven jurors who had been 'so attentive, so beautiful, so wonderful.' Earlier that morning, he had asked Judge Sullivan to remove the holdout for allegedly lying under oath and refusing to follow the law. Sullivan declined, and when pressed to re-question the juror more forcefully, replied: 'What do you want me to do? Get a brass band? I'm not an actor.'

Clancy will remain at Tewksbury State Hospital, where she has received psychiatric care since the killings. Plymouth District Attorney Tim Cruz now faces the decision of whether to retry her on first-degree murder, pursue lesser charges, or close the case — a choice he said he would not make that day. Patrick Clancy, Lindsay's ex-husband and the man who found the children that night, called the prospect of another trial 'extraordinarily painful,' saying there would never be closure from the loss of his children. Reddington, when asked how Lindsay Clancy was doing, said simply: 'not good.' A status hearing is scheduled for September 29; if a retrial is pursued, Reddington said she would be ready by fall.

A mistrial was declared Friday in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy after twelve jurors spent thirty-six hours unable to reach a verdict. The jury stood at eleven to one for acquittal, with a single holdout juror refusing to apply the judge's instructions on reasonable doubt—a refusal so explicit that Clancy's attorney Kevin Reddington filed an emergency appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in a last attempt to have the juror removed and deliberations restarted. The state's highest court rejected the appeal within minutes, and Plymouth Superior Court Judge William Sullivan formally declared the mistrial at 2:23 p.m., officially ending the trial.

Clancy, now paralyzed and confined to a wheelchair after jumping from a window the night her children died, pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in the deaths of five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson, and eight-month-old Callan in their Duxbury home on January 24, 2023. Prosecutors argued she planned and executed the killings with full knowledge of right and wrong. The defense conceded she killed her children but contended she should not be held criminally responsible because she was overmedicated and suffering from postpartum mental health crisis. That fundamental disagreement—not about whether she acted, but about her culpability—appears to have fractured the jury.

The courtroom itself bore the weight of the deadlock. When Judge Sullivan announced the mistrial, a female juror in her fifties or sixties visibly collapsed, bending over with her face in her hands. Two other women on the jury wiped away tears. The jurors had been sent back to deliberate multiple times over several days, each return signaling they remained stuck. Reddington's frustration with the holdout was barely contained. He told reporters the eleven other jurors had been "robbed" by one man who "stole seven weeks of the life of these other jurors that were so attentive, so beautiful, so wonderful." He added, "I hope that guy can sleep well at night."

The morning had begun with a tense hearing before the jury was brought in. Reddington asked Judge Sullivan to remove the holdout juror, claiming he had lied under oath and was refusing to follow the law. Sullivan refused, saying it was the juror's duty to accept the law as given. When Reddington pressed him to re-question the juror more forcefully, Sullivan shot back: "What do you want me to do? Get a brass band? I'm not an actor. I'm just giving the instructions." The judge had already instructed the jury on reasonable doubt according to the Supreme Judicial Court's own language; he saw no grounds to remove someone simply for disagreeing with eleven others.

Clancy will remain in custody at Tewksbury State Hospital north of Boston, where she has spent most of the time since the killings, receiving psychiatric care. Plymouth District Attorney Tim Cruz now faces a choice: retry her on first-degree murder, pursue lesser charges, or abandon the case altogether. He said Friday no decision would be made that day. He defended his original charging decision, saying the case was about "what she did on January 24, 2023, and the cruel and calculated killing of three innocents," not about healthcare systems or how women are treated within them, though he acknowledged postpartum depression has affected countless families.

Patrick Clancy, Lindsay's ex-husband and the man who discovered the children that night, released a statement through his attorney calling the prospect of another trial "extraordinarily painful." He said the loss of his children was something from which he would never recover and from which there would never be closure. Reddington said when asked how Clancy was doing after the mistrial: "not good." Her parents, who sat through seven weeks of testimony, were similarly affected. When asked if Clancy would accept a plea deal instead of facing trial again, Reddington said, "We'll see what Mr. Cruz wants to do and then we'll talk about our options."

Attorneys representing Clancy in a separate civil case against her doctors and hospitals said they plan to hold medical providers responsible for what they describe as negligence that led to the tragedy. Rosemary Scapicchio said the possibility of a second criminal trial is "devastating" and called the situation "a nightmare that is never going to end." A status hearing in the criminal case is scheduled for September 29. If Cruz decides to retry Clancy, Reddington indicated she would be ready by fall.

I'm not an actor. I'm just giving the instructions.
— Judge William Sullivan, responding to defense attorney's request to re-question the holdout juror more forcefully
The loss of Patrick's children is something from which he will never recover and from which there will never be closure. The prospect of reliving this tragedy through another trial is extraordinarily painful.
— Patrick Clancy, Clancy's ex-husband, in statement through his attorney
Contact Us FAQ