Chris Van Hollen Launches Long-Shot Challenge to Chuck Schumer for Senate Democratic Leader

"When the manager takes you to the World Series, you give them another contract."
Sen. Ruben Gallego's defense of Schumer as the caucus weighs a challenge from Van Hollen.
Mark

Why does this challenge matter if Schumer says he has the votes?

Mimi

Because the party just won big and the grumbling didn't stop. Sanders is publicly against Schumer, and several incoming freshmen won't back him.

Luke

Careful, though. Schumer's claim that he has the votes is his own statement. The reporting doesn't show a count.

Mark

And Van Hollen's own position?

Mimi

He said Saturday that running wasn't his focus, and Thursday he said he was still listening to members. That's a candidate feeling his way.

Luke

Right, and we don't know how many senators are actually with him. Public backers are El-Sayed and Sanders, and it's a secret ballot.

Mark

What's his specific complaint about Schumer?

Mimi

That Schumer and the DSCC meddled too much in primaries, siding against candidates who then won.

Luke

Worth noting that's Van Hollen's account. CNN reported Schumer quietly backed Stevens in Michigan, but the crypto and AIPAC claim is his characterization.

Mark

Is there a counterweight?

Mimi

Gallego and Gillibrand credit Schumer with winning the majority. Colom was noncommittal.

Luke

And no one has said how many Democrats are undecided. That's the number that decides this.

  • Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen has launched a direct challenge to Chuck Schumer, forcing a closed-ballot leadership fight into the open.
  • Schumer insists he holds the votes, but several senators and most incoming freshmen refuse to publicly back him.
  • Bernie Sanders has declared that the time for change is now and will not support Schumer, deepening the caucus rift.
  • Van Hollen's bid hinges on whether wavering senators break their silence before the December 1 vote, with the DSCC's role in primaries sitting at the center of the dispute.

In the quiet season after a midterm that gave Democrats reason for hope, a veteran Maryland senator has stepped forward to challenge Chuck Schumer for the leadership of the Senate caucus, setting up a closed-door vote on December 1. The contest is less a personal quarrel than a reckoning about what the party should look like as it gathers strength: whether the old hands who built the machinery should still steer it, or whether a newer, more confrontational spirit should take the wheel. Schumer insists he has the votes, while a growing number of colleagues and incoming members remain openly unconvinced, and the outcome will show how a fractured party understands its own voice.

On Thursday, Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen announced he would challenge Chuck Schumer for the top job among Senate Democrats, days after a midterm cycle that had given the party real reasons to celebrate. Speaking to MS NOW, he framed the move not as a grudge against any one man but as a response to the American people, describing the midterm results as a great outburst of democracy.

The contest is a closed-ballot election set for December 1, and Schumer needs only a majority of his caucus to keep the post he has held since 2017. He answered on X, saying he welcomed the conversation, was proud of a 55-seat caucus, and had the votes. Van Hollen's road into the race was not straight. He had long argued Democrats should debate who leads them, yet he also told CNN that seeking the job was not his focus, and he admitted an interest in a presidential run.

His rise among progressives is a little surprising for a veteran of two decades in Congress and several leadership posts. It came through his sharp criticism of Israel, his push for confrontation with President Trump, and a trip to El Salvador to meet Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident wrongly deported there. His sharpest critique of Schumer is that the leader and the DSCC meddled too much in primaries, a point he made by noting that two newly elected senators would not be in the room had Schumer's preferences prevailed.

Opposition is now open. Sanders has said he likes Schumer but that the time for change has come. Several incoming senators say they want new leadership, and one describes Schumer as divisive in many eyes. Defenders remain, including Ruben Gallego and Kirsten Gillibrand, who praised Schumer's effort. Others, like Scott Colom, would not say whether they would back him.

Beneath the vote lies a broader frustration: critics say Schumer has not fought Trump hard enough, and his long support for the US-Israel relationship sits uneasily with a party increasingly skeptical of it. Between now and December 1, the question is whether Van Hollen can win over the members who have so far held their tongues.

On Thursday, Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen said he would challenge Chuck Schumer for the top job among Senate Democrats. The announcement came days after a midterm cycle that Democrats had every reason to celebrate. In an interview with MS NOW, Van Hollen said the move was not about any one person but about answering the call of the American people, and he described the midterm results as a huge outburst of democracy.

The vote is a closed-ballot election scheduled for December 1, and Schumer needs only a majority of his caucus to keep the job. Democrats have flipped eight seats so far and will start January with at least 55 senators. Schumer has led the caucus since 2017. He answered the challenge on X, writing that he welcomed discussion about the caucus's future, was proud of what the group had accomplished with 55 seats and counting, and had the votes to keep serving as leader. On Tuesday he told reporters he was confident of being elected and saw great unity among Senate Democrats.

Van Hollen's path to the race was not a straight one. He has long said Democrats should debate who leads them next, but on Saturday he told CNN that seeking the job was not his focus, and noted that he was also interested in running for president. By Thursday afternoon he said he was still actively listening to members. Now 67, he has served in Congress for more than two decades, including 14 years in the House and in the Senate since 2017. He has held several leadership roles, among them House Democratic assistant to the leader and chair of both chambers' campaign arms. That résumé makes him an odd fit for an anti-establishment banner, but over the past two years he has become a favorite of some progressives through his criticism of Israel and his push for a more confrontational stance toward President Donald Trump.

His profile rose after he traveled to El Salvador to meet Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident who had been mistakenly deported there, which drew the administration's anger. Michigan Sen. Abdul El-Sayed told NPR that Van Hollen is willing to take risks when it matters, and called that trip a real risk. Van Hollen has also accused the Israeli government of ethnic cleansing in Gaza, called Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a wanted war criminal, and denounced the influence of AIPAC.

He has offered at least one specific critique of Schumer: that Schumer and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee involved themselves too much in this cycle's primaries. At a post-election conference on Tuesday, Van Hollen said two newly elected senators in the room would not be there had Schumer and the DSCC gotten their way, and that they had sided with the crypto industry and AIPAC against those candidates. He argued the DSCC should weigh in only under very rare exceptions. He was the first Democratic senator to endorse El-Sayed in the Michigan primary, where El-Sayed beat Rep. Haley Stevens, who had Schumer's quiet backing, according to earlier CNN reporting. Schumer backed El-Sayed afterward.

Opposition to Schumer is open. El-Sayed has suggested he would support Van Hollen, as has independent Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who caucuses with Democrats. At a Tuesday news conference alongside Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin, Sanders said he has known Schumer more than 30 years and likes him, but that the time is now for change and he will not support him. Incoming senators Adam Hamilton of Kansas, Troy Jackson of Maine, Annie Andrews of South Carolina and Peggy Flanagan of Minnesota have said they want a new leader. Hamilton told CNN that, fair or not, Schumer is seen as divisive by many people.

Schumer has defenders. Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego said that when the manager takes you to the World Series, you give him another contract. New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who ran the campaign arm this year, said the caucus is grateful and that no one put more effort into the cycle. Mississippi's Scott Colom, who will be the state's first Black senator since Reconstruction, said Schumer understood the party had to look South, though he disputed that Schumer recruited him. Asked whether he would back Schumer, Colom said he didn't know his options and asked what they were.

Liberal frustration over Schumer, who is 75, goes beyond this vote. Critics say he hasn't fought Trump hard enough, and his longtime support of the US-Israel relationship is at odds with growing Democratic skepticism. He may also face a primary challenge in 2028, potentially from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Between now and December 1, the question is whether Van Hollen's bid gains ground among members who have so far held back.

I have the votes to continue serving as Democratic Leader.
— Sen. Chuck Schumer, on X
The time is now for change, and I will not be supporting Chuck to be reelected as the Democratic leader.
— Sen. Bernie Sanders
Contáctanos FAQ