Certificate Restoring Voting Rights to Deceased Virginia Dog Prompts Lawmaker's Call for Audit

In Virginia, a certificate restoring civil rights arrived bearing a dog's name, and the sorrow of an owner who lost a beloved companion has collided with the machinery of a state trying to return voting power to people who served their sentences. The lawmaker demanding answers and the governor's office, which insists the paperwork belongs to a human being, are both reaching for the same thing: a trustworthy record of who the state believes it is restoring. The episode arrives in a season when Virginians will decide how such restorations should be granted at all, and it asks a quiet old question about whether a government can be generous and careful at once.

This fall, a Virginia owner opened an official letter and found a certificate restoring the civil rights of Biscuit, a beagle-hound mix from Goochland County who had died about five years earlier. The document carried Gov. Abigail Spanberger's signature and claimed the executive had reviewed the particulars of a criminal case before restoring her voting and jury-service rights.

The owner, who asked not to be named, passed the letter to Del. Tom Garrett, a Republican from Buckingham. In a statement, the owner described Biscuit as a good dog who is deeply missed, and said she had never been convicted of a felony, never showed any interest in voting, and never had any contact with a pound or Richmond that could have placed her on the rolls. A sibling is currently incarcerated, but the owner noted that the governor's effort only covers people who have been released.

Garrett framed the matter as one of process rather than principle. He said the question is not whether people who have served their sentences deserve a second chance, but whether the state is exercising a constitutional power with even basic review. He pointed to the administration's own promises, including a plan to proactively identify and restore eligible Virginians, and a rise in restorations from 66,000 to 100,000 since January. He has asked for an independent audit, disclosure of the record behind 'Biscuit Rigsby,' and preservation of relevant data.

Spanberger's office responded: "Of course we did not restore the rights of a dog." It said the record is linked to a person with a date of birth and Social Security number, but it has not explained how that person's file came to bear a dog's name.

The matter lands days before Virginians vote on a ballot measure to make restoration automatic. Whether this was a clerical error or a deeper flaw in the review, the question will likely shape the debate that follows the vote.

A Virginia man opened an official letter this fall and found a certificate restoring the civil rights of his dog. The dog, Biscuit, was a beagle-hound mix from Goochland County who died about five years ago. The document, bearing Gov. Abigail Spanberger's signature, says the executive reviewed the particulars of a criminal case and decided Biscuit's voting and jury-service rights should be restored.

The owner passed the letter to Del. Tom Garrett, a Republican from Buckingham, who is now demanding an investigation. The owner asked not to be named, citing a wish to avoid political backlash, but confirmed to Fox News Digital that the letter is authentic. In a statement to Garrett, the owner called Biscuit a good dog who is greatly missed, and said that, to their knowledge, she was never convicted of a felony and never showed any interest in voting.

The owner also said Biscuit was never sent to the pound or had any other contact with Richmond that might have put her on the voting rolls. A sibling is currently incarcerated, the owner said, but that connection is moot, because the governor's stated effort covers only former convicts who have been released.

The episode follows another controversy, in Chesapeake, over a certificate issued to "Betty No Last Name," a purported convict with no surname whose rights were restored. It also lands days before Virginians vote on an Election Day ballot measure, backed by Richmond Democrats, that would make voting-rights restoration automatic for felons.

Garrett, who practices law in Fluvanna County when he is not legislating, framed the matter as one of process rather than principle. "This is not a question of whether people who have served their sentences deserve a second chance," he said. He described it as a question of whether the Commonwealth is using a constitutional power of the governor with even basic review. He pointed to the administration's own words: in July, he said, it announced that Secretary of the Commonwealth Candi Mundon-King would proactively identify Virginians who had lost their rights, confirm they were eligible, and restore them. In August, Spanberger announced that the number of people whose rights had been restored since she took office in January had grown from an initial 66,000 to 100,000.

Garrett wants an immediate independent audit of the restoration actions. He also wants the state to disclose the record that led to "Biscuit Rigsby" being identified as a convicted felon, and to explain what the governor's office means by its "review of the particulars." He says any inquiry should count how many certificates and citations went to deceased, nonexistent or duplicate people, and should require immediate preservation of relevant data. He also wants to know what databases were used and what safeguards existed. He said his questions are not partisan and that supporters of restoration should be outraged too. In a video posted to social media, he asked, "At what point does rank incompetence and malfeasance become criminal conduct?"

Spanberger's office disputes the premise. A spokesperson told Fox News Digital: "Of course we did not restore the rights of a dog." The office said it could not disclose the individual's information, but that the record is associated with a person with a date of birth and Social Security number. It did not say how that person's record came to carry the dog's name on the certificate.

That unanswered question is what to watch. Virginians vote Tuesday on automatic restoration, and the debate over how the current review works, and whether a name error or a deeper flaw produced Biscuit's certificate, is likely to follow the ballot measure either way.

Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su Fox News ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti