Central Australian councils face months of delay in disaster recovery funding as federal minister pledges reform

Heavy rainfall isolated remote Central Australian communities and damaged roads, and councils say the delayed funding has left repairs stalled.
The floodwaters have gone, but the repairs are stuck in paperwork.
Almost eight months after the rain, three NT councils say recovery funding remains out of reach.
Mark

Why are councils out of pocket before anything is repaired?

Mimi

Because applications need engineers and consultants. Barkly paid for those up front on a claim of $4.3 to $4.7 million, with no decision date.

Luke

Worth noting that's the council's account. The NT government confirms the claim is under assessment but gave no timeline either.

Mark

What does the 79-page figure tell us?

Mimi

That the burden falls hardest on small remote councils with thin budgets. Ms Urquhart said the requirements are too difficult for them.

Luke

She's describing her council's experience. The reporting doesn't show how other councils have fared, other than Alice Springs saying it believes it got nothing for earlier floods.

Mark

Who is responsible for the delay?

Mimi

Each side points at the other. Ms McBain says the Territory should review its processes; the Territory cites national requirements.

Luke

And the Territory didn't say whether it would review its own procedures. That's unanswered.

Mark

Is there any fix on the table?

Mimi

A national task force, Territory-Commonwealth talks on simplifying, and Mr Varris's idea of up-front payments.

Luke

Only the task force is confirmed as existing. Up-front payments are a suggestion, not a plan, and no reform date has been given.

  • Roads damaged by heavy rain remain unrepaired almost eight months on, as councils wait on claims that have yet to be decided.
  • Barkly Regional Council's $4.3 to $4.7 million application, built on 79 pages of documentation, has been given no timeline for a decision.
  • Councils are paying engineers and consultants upfront, a cost cash-strapped remote councils say they cannot sustain.
  • A federal task force is examining the delays, but the NT government has not committed to reviewing its own procedures.
  • With another wet season approaching, councils fear repairs will not begin in time, leaving communities exposed again.

Across the red dirt and scattered communities of Central Australia, the flood waters have long since receded, yet the work of mending what they broke remains suspended in paperwork. Three councils, each responsible for roads that link people to their towns and services, describe a recovery arrangement that asks them to front costs they can barely carry while they wait, sometimes without end, for reimbursement. The federal minister has acknowledged the process is too slow and has convened a national task force to look into it, while the Northern Territory weighs how much of the system it is willing to examine within its own walls. It is a familiar story in disaster governance: relief exists in principle, but the distance between promise and payment is measured in months, and in remote places that distance is felt most sharply.

The floodwaters left Central Australia's roads months ago, but the repairs are still stuck in paperwork. Almost eight months after heavy rain cut off remote communities, three councils say they are struggling to access disaster recovery money.

The Barkly Regional Council has lodged a claim worth between $4.3 and $4.7 million, covering more than 30 roads and 127 damaged sites across eight communities. Its representative called the process extremely painful, pointing to 79 pages of documentation. The cash-strapped council paid up front for engineers and consultants to prepare the claim, has no time frame for a decision, and does not want to face another wet season with no work started.

Another council says the application requirements are too difficult for remote councils to meet, and that the rules bar recovery money from building new bridges or causeways in flood-prone spots. In Alice Springs, the town council's chief executive called the processes clumsy and suggested up-front payments so councils can hire contractors while they wait to be reimbursed.

Federal Emergency Management Minister Kristy McBain acknowledged the reimbursement system takes too long and is not good enough. A national task force is examining the delays, and she has urged the NT government to review its own procedures. The Territory says Barkly's application is still being assessed, and that it is working with the Commonwealth on simplification, though it did not confirm whether it will review its own processes.

What remains to be seen is whether the task force delivers change before the next wet season arrives.

The floodwaters left Central Australia's roads months ago, but the repairs are still stuck in paperwork. Almost eight months after heavy rain damaged infrastructure and cut remote communities off, three councils say they have struggled to get government disaster recovery money.

One of them, the Barkly Regional Council, has lodged an application worth between $4.3 million and $4.7 million. It covers more than 30 roads and 127 damaged sites across eight communities. A council representative described the process as extremely painful, citing 79 pages of documentation and the red tape around it. Mr Vashist said the cash-strapped council had paid up-front for engineers and consultants to prepare the claim, and that it has been given no time frame for a decision. He said the council does not want to enter another wet season with no work started, and called the complexities insane.

Ms Urquhart, speaking for another council, said it had tried to reach the funding but found the application requirements too difficult for remote councils to meet. She said the arrangements also bar recovery money from paying for new bridges or causeways in flood-prone spots where none existed before. In her words, it is an uneven playing field for remote councils.

In Alice Springs, Town Council chief executive Peter Varris said he did not believe his council had received funding for earlier flood damage either. He called the processes clumsy and said there was no doubt about that. His suggested fix is up-front payments, so councils can hire contractors and start work while they wait to be reimbursed.

Federal Emergency Management Minister Kristy McBain explained that the system is a reimbursement arrangement involving both levels of government, with councils applying through the Northern Territory government. She acknowledged the process takes too long and said she does not think it is good enough. A national task force, which includes Barkly Regional Council and Katherine Town Council, is examining the delays. She also urged the NT government to review its own procedures, noting those processes sit with the Territory's emergency management minister, and said she would like the Territory to look at them as every state does.

The NT government confirmed Barkly's application is still being assessed. Alice Springs Town Council's claims, submitted in June and updated in August, are also under assessment. MacDonnell Regional Council has not submitted a claim, though reconstruction applications stay open until April.

A government spokesperson conceded that national funding requirements are making it hard for some councils to lodge claims, and said the Territory is working with the Commonwealth on reforms to simplify the process. The spokesperson did not confirm whether the NT government will review its own procedures. Councils are paid once claims are judged eligible, the spokesperson said, and the Territory then seeks reimbursement from the Commonwealth.

What to watch is whether the task force produces changes before the next wet season, and whether the Territory commits to examining its own processes.

I don't think it's good enough that it takes councils this long.
— Kristy McBain, Federal Emergency Management Minister
The processes are clumsy. There's no doubt about that.
— Peter Varris, Alice Springs Town Council chief executive
Contáctanos FAQ