CDC Advisers Vote to Drop Universal Newborn Hepatitis B Shots, Drawing Warnings of Harm

Experts warn the change could lead to more hepatitis B infections in infants and children, which can become chronic and raise risk of liver cancer and cirrhosis.
Confusion often means the wrong medical decision.
Former CDC official Demetre Daskalakis warned of the effect of the panel's new hepatitis B wording on providers and parents.
Mark

Start with the basics. What actually changed on Friday?

Mimi

The panel dropped the blanket advice that every newborn get a hepatitis B shot. For mothers who test negative, it's now a conversation with a provider, and if the birth dose is skipped, they suggest waiting until at least 2 months.

Mark

So the vaccine is still available?

Mimi

Yes, and free, according to insurers and officials. The worry is what the new wording tells doctors and parents.

Luke

Let's be careful there. Daskalakis says confusion leads to wrong decisions. That's an expert's prediction, not an observed result. Nothing has happened yet.

Mimi

Fair. But the prediction is widely shared. The AAP, the AMA, and even panel member Meissner said infections will rise.

Mark

Meissner was on the panel, though.

Mimi

He voted no on two measures. The 8-3 and 6-4 splits show the committee wasn't unanimous.

Luke

And the change isn't final. Acting director Jim O'Neill still has to sign, though the CDC usually follows its advisers.

Mark

What about Siri's presentation?

Mimi

He argued the schedule lacks robust trials and that injured patients are ignored. Meissner called it a distortion. Those are competing characterizations, and the article doesn't settle the underlying claims.

Luke

One more gap: Levi suggested some parents might delay for years. That's his view of what might happen, not a forecast anyone has measured.

  • A panel selected by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. voted 8-3 to replace universal newborn hepatitis B shots with shared decision-making, and the vote lands in a country that has grown used to near-vanishing infections.
  • Pediatricians, the American Medical Association and infectious disease specialists are sounding alarms, calling the wording confusing and warning that parents will hear risk where science sees almost none.
  • Physicians are urging clinicians to keep following the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, while a senator who is a liver doctor has asked the acting CDC director not to sign the change.
  • Acting CDC Director Jim O'Neill now holds the decision, and because the agency usually follows its advisers, the policy is poised to shift unless he rejects it.
  • Vaccine access stays free no matter the outcome, yet the real fear is that delay and doubt could leave infants exposed to a virus that can become chronic and lead to liver cancer or cirrhosis.

In a quiet but consequential turn, a federal advisory panel chosen by a health secretary with a long record of vaccine skepticism has voted to move away from a near half-century-old practice of giving every American newborn a hepatitis B shot at birth. The change, which reshapes a policy in place since 1991, asks parents and doctors to decide together whether to vaccinate, even though the disease it prevents once struck thousands of children each year and now touches only a handful. Medical societies and many clinicians see in this shift a retreat from hard-won protection, a reminder that trust in health guidance is as fragile as the immunity it sustains. Whether the decision becomes policy now rests with the acting CDC director, who will weigh the panel's advice against the warnings of those who have spent their careers watching this disease fade.

On a Friday, a CDC advisory panel handpicked by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. voted to end the universal recommendation that every newborn receive a hepatitis B vaccine. The policy had stood since 1991, and public health experts say the change will bring more illness.

The panel voted 8-3 to recommend shared decision-making between providers and mothers who test negative for the virus. Families would decide with a clinician whether and when to vaccinate, including at birth. If the first dose is skipped, the panel suggests waiting until at least two months of age. Members also backed testing children for immunity before later doses and aligned the advice with the federal Vaccines for Children program.

Since universal infant vaccination began, childhood infections have dropped from an estimated 18,000 a year to about 20. The virus can pass from mother to child at birth, and about 90% of infected infants develop chronic disease, which raises the risk of liver cancer and cirrhosis. Kennedy had removed the previous 17 advisers before naming the current members, many of whom have voiced anti-vaccine views. Some dissenters, including a Dartmouth pediatrician and an MIT professor, warned of harm or noted that many parents might wait far longer than two months.

The votes do not change access, and vaccines would remain free. The concern is confusion. Former CDC official Dr. Demetre Daskalakis said the wording signals risk where none is meaningful, and the American Academy of Pediatrics called the guidance irresponsible. Sen. Bill Cassidy, a liver doctor, urged acting CDC Director Jim O'Neill not to sign it.

O'Neill now decides, and the agency typically follows its advisers. President Trump praised the vote, and officials have pointed to other countries' vaccine schedules as the rest of the childhood schedule appears to be next in line for review.

On Friday, a CDC advisory panel handpicked this year by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. voted to end the universal recommendation that every newborn in the United States receive a hepatitis B vaccine. The vote ends a policy that has stood since 1991, and public health experts say it will lead to more illness.

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, known as ACIP, voted 8-3 to recommend what it calls shared decision-making between providers and mothers who test negative for the virus. Under that approach, families would decide with a clinician whether and when to vaccinate, including at birth. If the shot is not given at birth, the panel suggests waiting until the child is at least 2 months old. Members also voted 6-4 to encourage testing children for immunity when deciding whether later doses are needed, and approved 8-0 a resolution aligning the recommendations with the federal Vaccines for Children program.

The current schedule calls for a first dose at birth, a second at 1 or 2 months, and a third between 6 and 15 months. Since universal infant vaccination began, infections in children have fallen from an estimated 18,000 a year to about 20. Hepatitis B is a highly infectious liver virus spread through blood or genital fluids. It can pass from mother to child during vaginal delivery or C-section, and through bites or scratches. Many adults clear it, but about 90% of infected infants and 30% of infected children aged 1 to 5 develop chronic disease, which raises the risk of liver cancer, organ failure and cirrhosis. People with chronic infection are 70% to 85% more likely to die early.

Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist, removed the previous 17 advisers before naming the current members. Many have voiced anti-vaccine views, but not all backed the change. Dr. Cody Meissner, a Dartmouth pediatrician, voted against the first two measures and said the panel was doing harm by changing the wording. Psychiatrist Dr. Joseph Hibbeln said the change had great potential to cause harm and hoped the committee would accept responsibility if it did. Dr. Retsef Levi, an MIT management professor, said the aim is to give parents more choice, and that many might wait far longer than two months, perhaps years or even until adulthood.

The votes do not change access. Insurers and officials said that even if the recommendations are adopted, parents who want the vaccine will still get it at no cost. The concern is confusion. Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, former director of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said the wording signals risk in a vaccine shown over decades to be exquisitely low risk, and that confusion often leads to the wrong medical decision. He urged providers to follow the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, both of which still recommend universal birth doses. AAP President Dr. Susan J. Kressly called the guidance irresponsible and purposely misleading, saying nothing new about the vaccine or children's risk prompted it. The American Medical Association urged rejection, with trustee Dr. Sandra Fryhofer calling the vote reckless. Sen. Bill Cassidy, a Republican physician who chairs the Senate health committee and cast a pivotal vote to confirm Kennedy, wrote that as a liver doctor he considered the change a mistake and that acting CDC Director Jim O'Neill should not sign it.

The agenda also included a presentation from Aaron Siri, managing partner of a law firm that sues agencies and states over vaccine policy and represents people claiming vaccine injuries. A close friend of Kennedy's who worked on his presidential campaign, Siri criticized the childhood schedule's clinical trials and safety data. Meissner called it a terrible distortion of the facts, said association is not causation, and said he did not think Siri should have been invited. Siri replied that he accepts his own bias, shaped by the injured patients he sees, and warned that failing to recognize them will feed vaccine hesitancy.

O'Neill now decides whether to approve the recommendations, and the agency typically follows its advisers. President Trump praised the vote on Truth Social and said he had signed a memorandum directing HHS to fast-track a comparison of vaccine schedules in other countries. Dr. Tracy Beth Hoeg, newly named acting director of the FDA's drug center, pointed to Denmark's simpler schedule and its lower aluminum exposure. Aluminum is a long-used adjuvant, and Kennedy has linked it to allergies despite broad evidence of its safety. The rest of the childhood schedule appears to be next.

We are doing harm by changing this wording.
— Dr. Cody Meissner, ACIP member and Dartmouth pediatrician
The hepatitis B vaccine is safe and effective. The birth dose is a recommendation, NOT a mandate.
— Sen. Bill Cassidy, on X
Fale Conosco FAQ