England's care system, the quiet web that tends to millions of vulnerable lives, has drifted for years without a steering hand, and the woman now asking who is holding the wheel is Lady Casey. Her warning, delivered as a call for a new settlement grounded in shared decency and mutual duty, arrives in the long shadow of the pandemic, when more than 43,000 people died in UK care homes, many without a familiar face beside them. Her argument is that a patchwork of local arrangements cannot be fixed by reshuffling structures alone, and that real change depends on sustained political will and a clea
Casey: Successive Governments Have Been 'Asleep at the Wheel' on England's Social Care System
"No one is in charge" of a system serving millions of vulnerable people
Why does a phrase like "asleep at the wheel" matter coming from Casey?
Because she isn't an outside critic. She's leading the commission preparing the review, and the prime minister has brought its deadline forward by 12 months.
What is she actually describing as broken?
A patchwork. Standards, assessments and waiting times differ by area, private providers dominate, and regulation has often been ineffectual.
Those are her claims in a pre-briefed speech. The reporting here doesn't give us the data behind them.
Fair. But she does cite research, doesn't she?
Yes, Nuffield Trust and the Institute for Government, which found the lack of oversight and a coherent narrative is a significant weakness that slows policy change.
And the comparison with France, Germany and Japan?
It's her framing. We're not told how those systems work or whether they'd fit England.
The researchers themselves warn against restructuring without a clear purpose. Political will matters more than reorganisation.
Where does Covid fit in?
She backs the inquiry's findings that the "protective ring" around care homes didn't hold. More than 43,000 care home deaths in the UK between March 2020 and July 2022.
And what's still unknown is whether Burnham's pension-savings funding plan will cover what a national care service would cost. That isn't answered here.
Der Puls
- Successive governments are described as asleep at the wheel, leaving a care system where no one seems to be in charge.
- Where someone lives now decides the standard of care, the speed of assessment and the length of waiting times, creating deep unfairness.
- A largely private sector operates under regulation that critics call ineffectual, while England lacks the stewardship seen in France, Germany and Japan.
- The Covid-19 inquiry has exposed the failure to protect care homes, and Casey's review has been pulled forward a full year toward Labour's manifesto.
- Researchers warn that reorganising governance will fail without funding, time and political determination, so the coming year will test whether promises become a plan.
England's care system, the quiet web that tends to millions of vulnerable lives, has drifted for years without a steering hand, and the woman now asking who is holding the wheel is Lady Casey. Her warning, delivered as a call for a new settlement grounded in shared decency and mutual duty, arrives in the long shadow of the pandemic, when more than 43,000 people died in UK care homes, many without a familiar face beside them. Her argument is that a patchwork of local arrangements cannot be fixed by reshuffling structures alone, and that real change depends on sustained political will and a clear purpose that a nation has yet to name.
On Wednesday, Louise Casey is set to tell the annual national children and adult services conference that England's adult social care has been left to drift. Successive governments, she will say, have been asleep at the wheel, and in effect no one is in charge of a system that supports millions of vulnerable people.
Casey, now Lady Casey, leads the social care commission and is preparing proposals for a major review. Her argument is that the system grew into a chaotic patchwork with no clear vision behind it. What people receive depends on where they live, since standards, assessment processes and waiting times all vary, and a dominant private sector has been held to weak oversight. She contrasts this with France, Germany and Japan, where stewardship allows improvements to be targeted and carried through. She hopes to build a new settlement for care on values she believes the country still shares: decency, contribution and a duty to care for one another.
The pandemic weighs heavily on the speech. Casey has told the Covid-19 inquiry that she agrees with its findings, which dismantled the claim that care homes had been protected by a ring of safety. Many older people died without loved ones beside them, and many care workers left their jobs after what they had witnessed. More than 43,000 people died from Covid-19 in UK care homes between March 2020 and July 2022. "It is a national shame that this was allowed to happen," she is expected to say. "It should never happen again."
Politically, the moment has momentum. Prime Minister Andy Burnham has embraced the review and brought its completion forward to next year, and a national care service is expected in Labour's next manifesto. He has suggested funding it by scrapping the pension triple lock, modelled on Scotland's free personal care with individuals meeting bed and board costs. Yet the researchers Casey draws on warn that structure alone will not deliver change. The question now is whether her findings become a funded, clearly owned plan.
On Wednesday, Louise Casey is due to stand before the annual national children and adult services conference and tell its delegates that England's adult social care system has been left to drift. Successive governments, she will say, have been "asleep at the wheel," and the result is that in effect "no one is in charge" of a system that provides vital services for millions of vulnerable people.
Casey, now Lady Casey, heads the social care commission and is preparing proposals for a major review of adult social care. Her argument, as previewed ahead of the speech, is that the system grew into a chaotic patchwork of local services with no clear vision behind it. What people receive depends on where they live: standards differ, so do assessment processes, and so do waiting times. The private care sector has become dominant, and regulation of services has often been ineffectual.
She will also point to what she describes as the absence of "system stewardship" in England. Without it, she will say, governments find it hard to target improvements or turn policy into practice on the ground. She contrasts this with comparable countries such as France, Germany and Japan. She is expected to call for a "new settlement" for care, built on values she believes the country still shares: decency, contribution, and a duty to care for neighbours, loved ones and ourselves.
The speech draws on research by the Nuffield Trust and the Institute for Government. It found that the lack of oversight and of a clear, coherent narrative is a significant weakness, made worse by the historically low visibility of social care among governments. That lack of clarity makes policy change slow and difficult. But the researchers also cautioned politicians against disruptive structural changes made without a clear purpose or political determination. In their words, no amount of reorganising governance structures will be enough without political impetus, and without resources, time and energy dedicated to social care.
Casey will also address the pandemic. She has written to the Covid-19 inquiry to say she agrees with its findings on social care. The inquiry, she will say, took apart the argument that a "protective ring" had been thrown around care homes. Many old people died without loved ones beside them, and many care workers left their jobs after what they had seen. "It is a national shame that this was allowed to happen," she is expected to say. "It should never happen again."
The inquiry's chair, Heather Hallett, said last month that the adult care sector had been treated as "something of an afterthought" during the pandemic, with residents and staff given insufficient protection. More than 43,000 people died from Covid-19 in UK care homes between March 2020 and July 2022.
The politics give the speech added weight. Andy Burnham, the prime minister, has embraced the Casey review and brought its completion forward to next year, 12 months sooner than the Starmer government had planned. The expectation is that a national care service plan will appear in Labour's next election manifesto. He has already said he would use savings from scrapping the state pension triple lock, beginning in the next parliament, to fund a care service modelled on the Scottish approach of free personal care, with individuals paying for "bed and board" costs. He also has ambitions to reform care funding and the workforce.
What to watch is whether Casey's findings next year translate into a funded, clearly owned plan, since the research she cites is blunt that structure alone will not deliver change without sustained political will.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
It is a national shame that this was allowed to happen. It should never happen again.— Louise Casey, head of the social care commission
Social care had been something of an afterthought during the pandemic.— Heather Hallett, Covid-19 inquiry chair