After nineteen years of legal struggle rooted in moral witness, a $150 million settlement has been reached on behalf of 1,373 Peruvians poisoned as children by lead emissions from an Andean smelter operated by a US mining company. Cardinal Pedro Barreto, who faced death threats for speaking truth to industrial power in La Oroya, helped transform a local catastrophe into a landmark case for cross-border corporate accountability. The settlement cannot restore what lead took from these young lives, but it affirms that even the longest arc of justice can bend — if someone is willing to stand in it
Cardinal's 20-year fight yields $150m settlement for 1,373 Peruvians poisoned by US smelter
The money will not compensate for the harm they have suffered
Why did it take nearly twenty years to reach this settlement?
The case had to fight its way through the federal court system against enormous resources. Doe Run had five major law firms opposing them. The Department of Justice itself argued the case should be moved to Peru, where the company believed they'd face less accountability.
And if it had been moved to Peru?
According to the lead attorney, the plaintiffs would have received nothing. The legal infrastructure there couldn't match what was available in the US courts. That's why keeping the case in St. Louis was so crucial.
What made Cardinal Barreto willing to face death threats for this?
He arrived in La Oroya as archbishop in 2004 and immediately saw the evidence—children with blood-lead levels among the highest ever recorded. He believed the church had a moral obligation to speak for those who couldn't protect themselves. The threats came from people afraid of losing their jobs, but he didn't back down.
Does the settlement actually fix anything in La Oroya?
Not the underlying problem. The smelter is still operating. The settlement compensates the victims, but it doesn't reverse the neurological damage already done to their brains. Barreto was clear about that—the money is justice, but it's also a measure of what was lost.
What does this case mean for other communities harmed by US companies abroad?
It sets a precedent that American corporations can be held accountable in US courts for environmental damage they cause in foreign countries. That's why Schlichter called it a historic tipping point. It changes the calculus for companies operating overseas.
O Pulso
- Nearly every child under six in La Oroya had blood-lead levels high enough to cause permanent neurological damage, making the town one of the most polluted places on Earth.
- Cardinal Barreto endured years of death threats from smelter workers who feared job losses, while the US Department of Justice itself tried to push the case out of American courts.
- Lead attorney Jerry Schlichter held the lawsuit in US federal court for nineteen years, warning that a transfer to Peru would have left the 1,373 plaintiffs with nothing.
- Doe Run's parent company, backed by a billionaire's fortune, agreed to pay $150 million without admitting any wrongdoing — a settlement that is both a legal victory and a quiet acknowledgment of irreversible harm.
After nineteen years of legal struggle rooted in moral witness, a $150 million settlement has been reached on behalf of 1,373 Peruvians poisoned as children by lead emissions from an Andean smelter operated by a US mining company. Cardinal Pedro Barreto, who faced death threats for speaking truth to industrial power in La Oroya, helped transform a local catastrophe into a landmark case for cross-border corporate accountability. The settlement cannot restore what lead took from these young lives, but it affirms that even the longest arc of justice can bend — if someone is willing to stand in its way.
In June, while Cardinal Pedro Barreto was in Rome with Pope Leo XIV, word arrived that a nineteen-year legal battle had finally ended. The Doe Run Company would pay $150 million to 1,373 Peruvians poisoned as children by lead emissions from a smelter in the Andes. Barreto, now 82, called it a historic milestone — while acknowledging that no sum of money could undo the neurological damage these young adults would carry for life.
The story began in La Oroya, a highland town where a multi-metal smelter had operated for decades. After Doe Run took control in 1997, emissions of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and sulfur dioxide rose sharply. By the time Barreto arrived as archbishop in 2004, researchers had already found that nearly every child under six in the area had blood-lead levels far beyond the threshold for permanent harm. The Blacksmith Institute would later rank La Oroya among the ten most polluted places on Earth.
Barreto began speaking out immediately, helping document the poisoning and becoming the public face of the town's suffering. The response was swift: smelter employees sent death threats, warning him to stop or face "more drastic measures." He endured it, insisting the real courage belonged to the families living with the consequences every day.
In 2007, a St. Louis law firm filed suit on behalf of 17 Peruvian children. The case grew into a federal lawsuit with 1,373 plaintiffs. For nearly two decades it ground through the courts — one of the longest civil cases ever brought against a multinational for cross-border environmental harm. Even the Department of Justice sided with Doe Run, seeking to move the case to Peru. Lead attorney Jerry Schlichter refused, warning that a transfer would have left the plaintiffs with nothing.
Doe Run, a subsidiary of billionaire Ira Rennert's Renco Group, agreed to the settlement without admitting wrongdoing. Each plaintiff will receive at least $100,000. For Barreto, the victory is bittersweet: the money may open doors to education and healthcare, but it cannot reverse the learning disabilities, behavioral struggles, and stunted growth that lead poisoning leaves behind. "The money will not compensate for the harm they have suffered," he said, "but it is a sign that justice has been served."
In June, while Cardinal Pedro Barreto sat in Rome with Pope Leo XIV and other church leaders, word arrived that a two-decade battle had finally ended. The Doe Run Company, a subsidiary of billionaire Ira Rennert's Renco Group, would pay $150 million to 1,373 Peruvians who had been poisoned as children by lead emissions from a smelter in the Andes. Barreto, now 82, called it a historic milestone—though he was careful to note that no amount of money could undo the neurological damage these young adults would carry for life.
The story began in La Oroya, a town nestled in the Peruvian highlands, where a multi-metal smelter had operated for decades. When Doe Run took control of the facility in 1997, emissions of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and sulfur dioxide climbed. By 2004, when Barreto arrived as archbishop of the region, the damage was already catastrophic. Researchers from Saint Louis University found that nearly every child under six in La Oroya had blood-lead levels above 10 micrograms per deciliter—far beyond the threshold known to cause permanent harm to developing brains. The Blacksmith Institute, an environmental watchdog, would later rank La Oroya among the ten most polluted places on Earth.
Barreto began speaking out almost immediately. He contacted the university researchers, helped document the poisoning, and became the public face of the town's suffering. The response was swift and brutal. Smelter employees, fearing for their jobs, sent him death threats. The harassment was relentless and often public—messages warning that if he continued, they would "take much more drastic measures." Barreto endured it. "It was an irrefutable fact that I was threatened in various ways," he said later, but he insisted the real courage belonged to the families of La Oroya, who lived with the consequences every day.
In 2007, a St. Louis law firm called Schlichter Bogard filed suit on behalf of 17 Peruvian children. The case would grow into a federal lawsuit involving 1,373 plaintiffs, now young adults. For nineteen years, it ground through the courts—one of the longest civil cases ever brought against a multinational corporation for environmental harm across borders. The Department of Justice itself sided with Doe Run, asking that the case be moved to Peru. The lead attorney, Jerry Schlichter, refused. "If the case had gone to Peru, the children would have got nothing," he said. He assembled a team of lawyers and religious leaders, including Barreto, who fought what he called a David-versus-Goliath battle against one of the world's wealthiest industrialists.
Rennert, now 92, had built his $3.8 billion fortune in the junk-bond markets of the 1980s before assembling an empire of mining and smelting operations. Doe Run never admitted wrongdoing in agreeing to the settlement. The company's chief executive, Matt Wohl, issued a brief statement saying they wanted to "put this behind us" and focus on their business. But the settlement stood: each of the 1,373 plaintiffs would receive at least $100,000.
For Barreto, the victory was bittersweet. The money would change lives—open doors to education, healthcare, opportunity that lead poisoning had threatened to close. But it could not reverse the damage already done. Children who should have grown up healthy had instead absorbed poison into their bones and brains. Some would struggle with learning disabilities, behavioral problems, stunted growth. The settlement was justice, he said, but it was also a measure of what had been lost. "The money will not compensate for the harm they have suffered," Barreto told the Guardian, "but it is a sign that justice has been served."
Citações Notáveis
This is a historic milestone. But this long-awaited justice doesn't solve the problem faced by many children who were personally affected, especially neurologically.— Cardinal Pedro Barreto
If the case had gone to Peru, the children would have got nothing.— Jerry Schlichter, lead attorney