Canberra construction sites lack basic sanitary facilities for women workers

Women workers experience reduced productivity, health impacts from inability to manage menstruation privately, and workplace intimidation when advocating for basic hygiene needs.
Unless I had personally said something, there would just be no facilities.
An electrician describes the burden women carry to advocate for basic sanitation at work.
Mark

So the law already requires these facilities. Why are sites still without them?

Mimi

Because the law exists but enforcement is reactive. Inspectors respond to complaints. Women have to report the problem first, and that takes courage when you're early in your career or the only woman on site.

Luke

Right, but how many actual violations has Worksafe found? The article says inspectors "substantiated some confronting accounts," but doesn't give a number. We don't know the scale.

Mark

Fair point. So is this widespread, or isolated to a few bad operators?

Mimi

Both, probably. Dewey's company does it right, but she acknowledges residential builders often don't because margins are tight. It's not malice—it's cost-cutting that hits women hardest.

Luke

And $150 a week is the hire cost. But what about the actual enforcement? Are sites being fined? Are directives being followed?

Mimi

The article doesn't say. We know directives are issued, but not whether they stick or what happens if someone ignores one.

Mark

So the cultural piece—that's the real barrier?

Mimi

Yes. Morgan's experience as an apprentice shows it. She was intimidated to speak up. If women have to fight for basic hygiene, they're already exhausted before the work starts.

Luke

But the industry group is now running a program to change that culture. Is it working? How many employers have signed on?

Mimi

The article doesn't give those numbers either. It's a positive signal, but we don't know the actual uptake or impact yet.

Mark

So what we know is: it's happening, it's illegal, but enforcement is patchy and cultural change is just beginning.

Luke

Exactly. The story is real, but incomplete. We're seeing the problem clearly. The solution is still being written.

  • Women on Canberra construction sites are physically leaving their worksites mid-shift to find toilets, losing time, focus, and professional standing in the process.
  • The absence of sanitary bins and private facilities forces women to manage menstruation without privacy, creating real health consequences and a culture of silence around basic needs.
  • Speaking up about missing facilities carries its own cost — women describe feeling intimidated and criticised for raising something as fundamental as hygiene.
  • The fix is not expensive: separate facilities cost around $150 a week, yet many employers — especially on residential builds — skip them entirely.
  • Worksafe ACT inspectors are documenting breaches and issuing legal directives, while industry body Master Builders ACT has launched a gender-inclusion program called Level the Site.
  • The goal advocates are pushing toward is cultural normalisation — facilities that are automatic on every site, not something women must negotiate for themselves.

Across Canberra's construction sites, women workers are stepping away from their jobs simply to find a toilet — a quiet indignity that reveals how workplaces built by many hands were not always built with all workers in mind. The law already requires adequate sanitary facilities, yet enforcement remains uneven and the culture of assumption persists, particularly on smaller residential builds where margins are tight and women's needs are still treated as optional extras. What is unfolding is not merely a compliance failure but a deeper reckoning with who construction sites were designed for, and who they must now become.

On construction sites across Canberra, women are leaving their work to find a toilet. Not by choice — because there isn't one on site. They walk off, find a public facility, and walk back. Time lost, focus broken, a basic need treated as an afterthought.

Carly Dewey, director of Temperley Homes and a 15-year veteran of the industry, insists on separate male and female toilets with serviced sanitary bins on every project she runs. It costs around $150 a week — a line item, she says, like any other. She understands why smaller residential builders skip it: tighter margins, smaller crews. But she also believes the principle is simple. "We make up half the population. We should be in construction."

Electrician Lainey Morgan has worked across both residential and commercial sites and has seen the full range. Some sites now provide sanitary products; others barely have a portable toilet. When facilities fall short, she leaves the site to find public bathrooms, fracturing her day. But the deeper problem, she says, is cultural. Early in her career, raising the issue felt impossible — women are "almost criticised for discussing something like basic needs." Both she and Dewey want facilities to become automatic, not something women have to ask for.

The law already requires it. Worksafe ACT's code mandates clean, safe, accessible toilets and washing facilities for all workers. Commissioner Jacqueline Agius says inspectors have documented serious breaches — workers unable to change sanitary products privately, unable to wash their hands. When violations are found, legal directives follow. But Agius notes the problem reaches beyond construction, with complaints arriving from multiple industries.

Master Builders ACT has responded with a program called Level the Site, working with employers to embed gender-inclusive practices — including sanitation — into standard site setup. Chief executive Anna Neelagama puts it plainly: appropriate facilities make workplaces safer, more productive, and more welcoming to women. The conversation is shifting from whether women belong in construction to how to make the conditions actually work for them. On some sites, though, women are still walking off the job to find a toilet.

On construction sites across Canberra, women are leaving their jobs to find a toilet. Not because they want to—because there isn't one on site. They walk off the work, find a public facility somewhere nearby, and walk back. Time lost. Productivity interrupted. A basic human need treated as an inconvenience.

Carly Dewey has spent more than 15 years in construction and has watched this happen to workers on other people's sites while she makes sure it doesn't happen on hers. As director of Temperley Homes, she insists on separate male and female toilets with serviced sanitary disposal bins at every project she runs. It costs about $150 a week to hire the facilities, plus a bit more for servicing and transport. She sees it as a line item, like any other job cost. "We make up half the population," she said. "We should be in construction." But she also understands why others don't do it. Residential construction has tighter margins and smaller crews than commercial work. The economics feel different when every dollar counts.

Electrician Lainey Morgan has worked across both residential and commercial sites in Canberra and has seen the full spectrum. Some sites now provide sanitary products, which she welcomes. Others, she said, you're lucky if there's even a portable toilet. When facilities are inadequate, she ends up leaving the site to find public bathrooms, which fractures her workday and her focus. But the practical problem—lost time, reduced output—is not the deepest one. The real issue, she said, is cultural. Early in her career, when she was the only woman on some sites, speaking up about missing facilities felt impossible. "Unless I had personally said something, which can be really intimidating to speak up about, then there would just be no facilities," she recalled. "They're almost like criticised for discussing something like basic needs." Both Morgan and Dewey want facilities to become automatic—something built into every site setup, not something women have to negotiate or request.

The law already requires it. Worksafe ACT has a code that mandates employers provide toilets and washing facilities that are clean, safe, maintained, and accessible to all workers. ACT Work Health and Safety Commissioner Jacqueline Agius said her inspectors have documented serious breaches. Workers have reported being unable to change sanitary products in private, unable to wash their hands. Portable toilets on residential sites are often poorly maintained. When inspectors find violations, they issue legal directives to fix them. But Agius also noted the problem extends beyond construction—her office has fielded complaints across multiple industries over the past year.

The industry is beginning to shift. Master Builders ACT, the peak body for the sector, has launched a program called Level the Site that works with employers to build gender-inclusive workplace culture, including ensuring sanitation facilities are in place. Chief executive Anna Neelagama framed it plainly: appropriate facilities make workplaces safer and more productive, and they help grow the female workforce in construction. The conversation is moving from whether women belong in construction to how to make the conditions actually work for them. For now, though, on some sites in Canberra, women are still walking off the job to find a toilet.

We make up half the population. We should be in construction.
— Carly Dewey, Temperley Homes director
If there aren't adequate facilities on site, then I'm usually having to go and find public facilities off site. I think it affects productivity.
— Lainey Morgan, electrician
Contattaci Domande frequenti