Canada's silence on Netanyahu overflight raises sovereignty questions

It isn't up to Benjamin Netanyahu to choose where he gets to fly
A legal expert explains that Canadian airspace is sovereign territory, and Canada alone decides who enters it.
Mark

Why does it matter whether Netanyahu's plane flew over Canada if it never landed?

Mimi

Because airspace is sovereign territory. The moment a plane crosses your maritime boundary, it enters your jurisdiction and becomes subject to your laws. It's not like international waters—it's yours to control.

Mark

So Canada could have stopped him?

Mimi

Yes. Canada requires foreign government aircraft to request permission 72 hours in advance. If Israel requested and Canada refused, Netanyahu shouldn't have crossed. If Canada granted permission, it contradicted its own arrest warrant pledge. Either way, Canada made a choice and won't explain it.

Mark

Why won't they just say what happened?

Mimi

That's the real question. The silence suggests either embarrassment or calculation. Admitting permission granted looks like abandoning international law. Admitting permission was violated looks like weakness. So they say nothing.

Mark

Does this actually undermine the ICC?

Mimi

It does. If countries can silently allow wanted criminals to transit their airspace, the arrest warrant becomes symbolic rather than binding. The whole system depends on states actually enforcing it.

Mark

What's the precedent here?

Mimi

That's what worries legal experts most. If Netanyahu can fly over Canada without consequence, what stops a Russian spy plane? Or any foreign actor? You're essentially telling the world your airspace isn't really yours to control.

Mark

Could Canada still arrest him if he lands?

Mimi

In theory, yes. But the pattern suggests Israel is testing how far it can go. Each flight pushes the boundary a little further. Eventually, landing becomes the next logical step.

  • Netanyahu, subject to an ICC arrest warrant for alleged war crimes in Gaza, flew over Canadian airspace multiple times while Canada's own prime minister had pledged to arrest him on Canadian soil.
  • Canada's government refused to confirm whether it granted permission for the overflights, hiding behind procedural language and a policy that decouples airspace access from law enforcement — a position legal experts say does not hold up.
  • The pattern of flights tells its own story: Israel once rerouted entirely to avoid Canada, then began crossing freely, suggesting either quiet permission was granted or violations went unanswered.
  • Legal scholars warn that Canada now faces two damaging truths — either it abandoned its ICC commitments by granting permission, or it allowed a foreign violation of its sovereign airspace to pass without consequence.
  • The precedent troubles experts beyond this single case, raising the prospect that other state actors may test Canadian airspace if the government continues to respond with silence rather than clarity.

When a plane carrying a head of government wanted by the International Criminal Court crossed Canadian skies without explanation or consequence, it raised a question older than any warrant: who truly governs a nation's territory? Canada's silence in the face of Benjamin Netanyahu's repeated overflights — whether born of quiet permission or quiet surrender — places the country at a crossroads between its stated commitments to international law and the political calculus of a complicated moment. Sovereignty, legal scholars remind us, does not end at the shoreline.

On a Monday in late July, an Israeli government aircraft carrying Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu crossed Canadian airspace over Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, bound for Washington. Israel later confirmed it had requested permission for the overflight. Canada refused to say whether that permission was granted — or even to acknowledge what had occurred in its own skies.

The silence carries weight. The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu in November 2024, alleging murder, persecution, and the use of starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza. Both Prime Minister Mark Carney and his predecessor Justin Trudeau had pledged to arrest Netanyahu if he set foot in Canada. Yet the plane passed through without incident, and officials offered only deflection: overflight policy, they suggested, is not linked to law enforcement unless an imminent security risk exists.

International law professor Mark Kersten pushes back firmly. Canadian airspace is Canadian sovereign territory, he argues, extending to the edge of outer space. Foreign government aircraft must apply for permission at least 72 hours in advance. The choice of route belongs to Canada, not to Netanyahu. "It isn't up to Benjamin Netanyahu to choose where he gets to fly," Kersten said, "if that means flying over Canada."

The flight history deepens the concern. In September 2025, Netanyahu's plane took a lengthy detour over the Atlantic to avoid Canadian airspace entirely — a sign that Israeli officials once took the risk seriously. By December 2025, the plane crossed Newfoundland and Nova Scotia. By February 2026, it crossed three provinces. The shift suggests either that Canada quietly began granting permission, or that Israel concluded violations would go unanswered.

Kersten frames the dilemma starkly: if Canada granted permission, it has walked away from its international law commitments; if it refused and Israel flew through anyway, Canada allowed a sovereignty violation to pass in silence. Either outcome is damaging. At a moment when Canadian sovereignty is already under pressure from its southern neighbour, the government's evasions send a message that its airspace — and its principles — may be more negotiable than its leaders have claimed.

On Monday, an Israeli government Boeing 767 crossed into Canadian airspace carrying Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu toward Washington, D.C., where he was scheduled to meet with U.S. President Donald Trump and attend a funeral. The Israeli government later told CBC News it had requested permission from Canada for this overflight across Newfoundland and Nova Scotia. Canada's government has refused to say whether it granted that permission—or even to confirm the basic fact of what happened in its own skies.

This silence matters because Netanyahu is wanted. The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for him on November 21, 2024, alleging murder, persecution, and using starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has previously stated he would arrest Netanyahu if the Israeli leader entered Canada. His predecessor, Justin Trudeau, made the same pledge. Yet the plane crossed Canadian territory without incident, and the government offered no explanation.

When pressed, officials offered only procedural deflection. Audrey Champoux, a spokesperson for the Prime Minister's Office, declined to confirm whether Canada had granted permission. Instead, she noted that Canada does not ordinarily link its overflight policy to law enforcement objectives except where an imminent security risk exists. Charlotte MacLeod of Global Affairs Canada added that the department does not comment on which routes foreign states choose to take. The implication was clear: the decision belonged to Israel, not Canada. But that claim does not withstand scrutiny.

Mark Kersten, an international law professor at the University of the Fraser Valley, argues that Canadian airspace is Canadian sovereign territory, extending upward to the Kármán line at 100 kilometres altitude where outer space begins. Any aircraft that crosses a country's maritime boundary enters its national jurisdiction and becomes subject to its laws. Protocol requires foreign government flights to submit applications at least 72 hours before entering Canadian airspace. "It isn't up to Benjamin Netanyahu to choose where he gets to fly," Kersten said, "if that means flying over Canada." The decision belongs to Canada alone.

What makes this moment particularly striking is the pattern. In September 2025, Netanyahu's plane took a circuitous route over the Mediterranean and Atlantic to avoid Canadian airspace entirely—a time-consuming detour that suggests Israeli officials were then cautious about crossing Canadian territory. But by December 2025, the plane overflew Newfoundland and Nova Scotia en route to Florida. In February 2026, it crossed Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island, and New Brunswick. The trajectory suggests either that Canada began granting permission, or that Israel decided to risk violation without consequence.

Kersten warns that Canada's silence creates two equally troubling scenarios. If Canada granted permission, it has abandoned its commitment to international law and its own stated position on the ICC arrest warrant. If Canada refused permission and Israel violated Canadian airspace anyway, Canada has allowed that violation to pass without public response or consequence. Either way, the government has failed to defend its sovereignty. "When we're thinking about territorial integrity, you don't just think about the land," Kersten said. "You think about the seas nearby and the air above."

The stakes extend beyond Netanyahu. Kersten argues that allowing this overflight sets a precedent that other foreign actors—Russian spy planes, for instance—may seek to exploit. At a moment when Canadian sovereignty is already being questioned by the United States, the silence sends a message that Canada is unwilling or unable to control its own airspace. "It seems implausible that the government of Canada didn't allow this to happen on some level," Kersten said. The question now is whether Canada will clarify its position or continue to speak in evasions while foreign leaders transit its skies.

It isn't up to Benjamin Netanyahu to choose where he gets to fly if that means flying over Canada.
— Mark Kersten, international law professor at the University of the Fraser Valley
Canada does not currently link its overflight policy to law enforcement objectives except where an imminent security risk is present.
— Audrey Champoux, Prime Minister's Office spokesperson
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei CBC ↗
Kontakt FAQ