A father in California has found himself at the edge of a question as old as public schooling itself: whether the state may decide which ideas a child can encounter when the state is also paying for the child's learning. John Woolard, who homeschools his five children through a public charter program, says purchases were repeatedly refused not for poor quality or failure to meet standards, but because the books spoke of God or faith. The matter now rests with the United States Supreme Court, which must decide whether to hear the appeal, and the answer will mark how far public benefit reaches i
California Father Says Charter School Rejected Homeschool Books That Mentioned God, Forcing Family to Pay
Any book that referenced God or faith, even adjacently, was being denied
Let me start with the basic claim. What does Woolard say actually happened?
His family used a public charter school program to homeschool their five children. He says purchases of books and curriculum were denied whenever they referenced God or faith, even loosely, and that his family then had to pay out of pocket.
He also says it wasn't only Christian textbooks.
Right. He mentions books about the religious beliefs of the Founding Fathers being denied. He calls the pattern a "publisher blacklist."
Worth flagging that the blacklist label is his, not a documented list we've seen. Nothing in this reporting shows the list itself.
And the conversation with school staff?
He says he asked if the curriculum met state standards and was rigorous, and the answer was yes. He says a teacher and a principal acknowledged the religious content was the objection.
That's his recollection of those exchanges. The school hasn't been quoted, and the state education department declined comment because of the pending litigation.
Why does the cost matter so much to him?
With five kids, the program was a way to fit lessons to each child affordably. Denials meant the family absorbed the expense.
What happens next?
The family lost in a lower court. Their attorney, Stephanie Taub of First Liberty Institute, says the Supreme Court is deciding whether to take the case, with word expected in a few months.
And remember, whether the Court takes it is unknown. Taub's timeline is her expectation, and Woolard's hope that a ruling would open things up for other families is a hope, not a forecast.
Il Polso
- A father of five says his charter school repeatedly rejected curriculum purchases solely because they referenced God or faith, even when the materials met California academic standards.
- The family now pays for books out of pocket after losing in a lower court, a cost they say other families avoid with public funds.
- Attorneys from First Liberty Institute are asking the Supreme Court to take the case, calling the policy discriminatory against parents who want faith-based education.
- The justices have not yet decided whether to review the appeal, and a decision is expected within months.
- California's Department of Education declined comment citing pending litigation, leaving the school's side of the story unheard.
A father in California has found himself at the edge of a question as old as public schooling itself: whether the state may decide which ideas a child can encounter when the state is also paying for the child's learning. John Woolard, who homeschools his five children through a public charter program, says purchases were repeatedly refused not for poor quality or failure to meet standards, but because the books spoke of God or faith. The matter now rests with the United States Supreme Court, which must decide whether to hear the appeal, and the answer will mark how far public benefit reaches into the lives of families who believe differently.
John Woolard and his wife have taught their five children at home through a public charter school program, an arrangement that gave them a practical way to fit lessons to each child's needs. It worked well at first. Then, Woolard says, purchases began coming back denied for a single reason: the books mentioned God or faith, sometimes only in passing. He describes a "publisher blacklist" that extended even to books examining the religious beliefs of the Founding Fathers, material he would have expected to be uncontroversial.
The cost of those refusals has landed on his household. Woolard says he asked officials whether the curriculum met state standards and was academically rigorous, and was told yes. When he asked whether the faith content was therefore the only objection, he says a teacher and a principal agreed that it was. For him, the lesson was that equal treatment extended only as far as the government approved.
First Liberty Institute's Stephanie Taub argues the policy singles out parents seeking faith-based education and denies them benefits available to others. The family lost in a lower court and is now asking the Supreme Court to hear the case, a decision expected within months. The California Department of Education declined to comment on pending litigation, so the school's account is absent from the reporting. For now, the Woolards continue to pay for what they believe public funds should cover.
John Woolard, a California father of five, says the purchases he wanted to make for his children's education kept coming back denied for one reason: the books mentioned God.
Woolard and his wife educate their children at home through a public charter school program. He told Fox News Digital that the arrangement worked fine at first. Then, he says, the family learned that their curriculum choices were being reviewed for religious content.
"Any book or curriculum purchase that we wanted to make that referenced God or faith in even, like, an adjacent sort of way was being denied," Woolard said. He called the practice a "publisher blacklist" and said it reached beyond explicitly Christian instructional materials. In his telling, even books examining the religious beliefs of America's Founding Fathers were turned down. He said he would have expected that subject to be uncontroversial.
The money matters here as much as the principle. Woolard said the charter program gave a family with five children an affordable way to tailor lessons to each child's needs. When a purchase was rejected, the cost shifted to the household. In his words, the family has to pay for those resources out of pocket, while he says other parents can obtain educational materials with public funds.
He said he pressed school officials for an explanation. He asked whether the curriculum met California standards and whether it was academically rigorous enough. According to Woolard, the answer to both was yes. He says he then put the question plainly: if that was so, the only objection was the faith component. He said both a teacher and a principal acknowledged that it was. "What that tells me is that equality only extends as far as what the government approves," he said.
Stephanie Taub, senior counsel with First Liberty Institute, characterized the policy as discriminatory. She told Fox News Digital that California has a policy singling out parents who want to give their children a faith-based education, and that it excludes them from homeschooling benefits otherwise available to others.
The family lost in a lower court and is now asking the Supreme Court to take the case. Taub said the justices are considering whether to hear it, and she expects to learn in the next few months whether they will.
Woolard said he hopes the Court will tell California it got the decision wrong and show it how to correct course. He added that such a ruling could "break open California for a lot of families" seeking similar changes.
A spokesperson for the California Department of Education told Fox News Digital the department cannot comment on pending litigation. The account of what school staff said comes from Woolard, and the school's side is not described in the reporting. What to watch is whether the Supreme Court agrees to review the case, a decision expected within months.
Citazioni salienti
If our curriculum choices are denied, then we have to pay for those resources out of pocket.— John Woolard, to Fox News Digital
California has a policy that singles out parents who want to give their children a faith-based education, and it excludes them from homeschooling benefits otherwise available.— Stephanie Taub, senior counsel, First Liberty Institute