In the long arc of a society's reckoning with the rights of its youngest members, California has drawn a new line: beginning January 2027, no child under 18 may legally marry within its borders. The state becomes the 18th to close a loophole that, in the absence of any minimum age, had allowed parental and judicial consent to substitute for a child's own. Behind the legislation stand survivors who lived the consequences — trapped in marriages they could not choose to leave, denied schooling, denied futures — and who spent years turning private suffering into public law. Thirty-two states have
California becomes 18th state to ban child marriage
Child marriage survivors report being trapped in abusive relationships, denied education, and forced into motherhood at young ages without ability to consent or divorce.
Kids, they can't consent. People have the audacity to tell me I made a choice.
Mark
Why does California's ban matter if 32 other states still allow it?
Mimi
It matters because California is the most populous state in the country. Nine thousand girls a year were getting married there. That's a massive number of young people suddenly protected from a practice that often led to abuse and trapped them in relationships they couldn't leave.
Luke
But we should be careful about that nine thousand figure—that's from one advocacy group, Unchained At Last. I don't see independent verification of that number in the reporting.
Mimi
Fair point. But even if the number is different, the pattern is clear from the survivors themselves. Courtney Stodden, Brittany Bee, Sara Tasneem—they all describe being trapped, unable to divorce, forced into motherhood as teenagers.
Mark
What happens to people who are already married under the old law?
Mimi
The reporting doesn't say. That's actually a significant gap. The law bans future marriages, but it doesn't address the thousands of people already in these marriages.
Luke
Right. And we don't know if there's a mechanism for them to divorce now, or if they're still stuck in the same legal limbo they were before.
Mark
So the law protects future generations but leaves current victims where they are?
Mimi
It appears so. Which is why the survivors are framing this as a beginning, not an ending. Stodden said she'll keep fighting until all 50 states ban it.
Luke
The reporting does show that 18 states have banned it since 2018, so there's momentum. But 32 states still allow it, which means the practice is still happening in most of the country.
Mark
And the survivors are the ones doing the advocacy work?
Mimi
Largely, yes. Tasneem started lobbying in 2017. Stodden has been public about her experience. Bee is speaking to media. These aren't policy experts—they're people who lived through it and decided to fight back.
O Pulso
- For decades, California had no minimum marriage age — only a judge's signature and a parent's permission stood between a child and a legally binding union.
- Survivors like Courtney Stodden, married at 16 to a 50-year-old man, and Sara Tasneem, forced into an arranged marriage at 15 the morning she met her husband, have carried the human cost of that legal silence for years.
- Approximately 9,000 girls were married annually in California under the old rules, nearly all to adult men, with no legal path to divorce available to anyone under 18.
- Governor Newsom signed the ban into law alongside Stodden, marking a legislative victory that advocates describe as long overdue but explicitly unfinished.
- The law takes effect January 1, 2027, and campaigners are already turning their attention to the 32 states where child marriage remains legal, vowing to fight until a national ban is achieved.
In the long arc of a society's reckoning with the rights of its youngest members, California has drawn a new line: beginning January 2027, no child under 18 may legally marry within its borders. The state becomes the 18th to close a loophole that, in the absence of any minimum age, had allowed parental and judicial consent to substitute for a child's own. Behind the legislation stand survivors who lived the consequences — trapped in marriages they could not choose to leave, denied schooling, denied futures — and who spent years turning private suffering into public law. Thirty-two states have yet to follow, and those who fought for this moment have already said they will not rest until they do.
In late September, California's governor signed legislation that will, starting January 1, 2027, prohibit anyone under 18 from marrying in the state. The signing closed a gap that had existed since California's founding: with no minimum age on the books, only parental consent and a judge's approval had stood between a child and a legally binding marriage. That loophole is now sealed.
Governor Newsom signed the bill alongside Courtney Stodden, who at 16 was permitted by her parents to marry a 50-year-old actor. The marriage brought public attention but also trapped her in a relationship she had no legal means to leave. Stodden called the new law a victory while making clear she would continue pushing until all 50 states had enacted similar bans.
The scope of what the law addresses is significant. Advocacy group Unchained At Last estimates roughly 9,000 girls were married each year in California under the previous rules, nearly all to adult men, and none of them had any legal mechanism to seek divorce before turning 18. Brittany Bee, married at 17 to escape an abusive home, described the experience as trading one form of captivity for another. Sara Tasneem was 15 when she met her future husband on the morning of their arranged wedding. She was pregnant within a year and had dropped out of school by 16. She began lobbying for a ban in 2017 and described watching the bill finally pass as the end of a marathon.
California is now the 18th state to ban child marriage since 2018, but 32 states still permit the practice. Advocates say public awareness of how widespread the issue remains is low, and that documented harms — abuse, forced pregnancy, lost education — continue in those places. The survivors who drove this law forward have been explicit: the work is not finished.
On a day in late September, California's governor signed a bill that will reshape the lives of thousands of young people in the state. Starting January 1, 2027, no one under 18 will be allowed to marry in California. The law closes a legal gap that had existed since the state's founding: there was no minimum age to wed, only a requirement that parents consent and a judge approve. That loophole is now sealed.
Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation alongside Courtney Stodden, whose story gave the abstract issue a human face. At 16, Stodden's parents allowed her to marry Doug Hutchison, a 50-year-old actor known for roles in films like The Green Mile and A Time to Kill. The marriage made international headlines and led to appearances on reality television programs, but it also trapped a teenager in a relationship she could not legally exit. Stodden has spent years since advocating to end the practice, and she called the new law a victory—though she framed it as incomplete. She said she would continue fighting until all 50 states had banned child marriage, not just California.
The scale of what California's law addresses is substantial. According to Unchained At Last, an advocacy organization tracking the issue, approximately 9,000 girls were married each year in California under the old rules. Nearly all of those marriages involved girls paired with adult men. Before this year, there was no legal mechanism for anyone under 18 to divorce, meaning many found themselves trapped in relationships they had never truly chosen.
Brittany Bee, who was married at 17 to escape an abusive home, described the experience as moving from one prison to another. She told the BBC that she was then allegedly abused by her adult husband. "Kids, they can't consent," she said, pushing back against the notion that young people could meaningfully choose marriage. Bee has been part of a years-long effort by survivors to change California's laws, and she saw the new legislation as a message to the world that children deserve protection from what she called systemic violence.
Sara Tasneem was 15 when she was forced into an arranged marriage with a man nearly twice her age. She met him the morning of the wedding. "I was forced to be his wife and that day, my entire life changed," she told the BBC. She became pregnant within a year and dropped out of school at 16. Tasneem began lobbying for a ban in 2017, and she described watching the bill move through the legislative process as a marathon. When it finally passed, she felt relief that future children in California would be spared what she endured.
California is now the 18th state to ban child marriage since 2018, joining a growing but still incomplete movement across the country. Thirty-two states still permit the practice, often with parental or judicial consent. Advocates say many Americans are unaware that child marriage remains legal in so many places, or that it has led to documented cases of abuse, forced pregnancy, and educational disruption. The new California law represents progress, but the work is far from finished. Stodden and others have made clear they will not stop until every state has closed the door on a practice that has trapped generations of young people in relationships they could not escape.
Citações Notáveis
A message of hope for all children that they may be free from systemic violence. That they may choose their own path.— Brittany Bee, child marriage survivor
I was forced to be his wife and that day, my entire life changed.— Sara Tasneem, who was married at 15
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em BBC News ↗