In a Sydney courtroom, the domestic world of broadcaster Alan Jones has been opened to scrutiny through the testimony of the man who lived closest to its rhythms. David Allan, Jones's butler of nearly two decades, offered the court a portrait of a household defined by relentless routine and a steady procession of young male athletes — a portrait that neither condemns nor absolves, but illuminates the terrain on which five men's allegations must now be weighed. At eighty-five, Jones faces twenty-one charges he firmly denies, and the trial enters its final stretch with the last complainant yet t
Butler testifies Jones greeted athlete with 'hug and slap on bottom'
Probably the wrong thing to say today, isn't it?
What does a butler's testimony actually add to a case like this? He wasn't present for the alleged assaults.
He establishes the setting and the pattern. He confirms the athlete visited repeatedly, confirms the greeting ritual the athlete described, confirms there were other young men around. He's a corroborating witness to the ordinary facts.
But here's the thing—he explicitly said under cross-examination that he saw no inappropriate behaviour. So the defence gets to say: the man who was there every day saw nothing wrong. That's powerful for Jones's side.
So his testimony cuts both ways.
It does. He confirms details that support the complainant's account of the greeting. But he also provides testimony that Jones's behaviour, at least in his presence, appeared normal.
The prosecution is building a picture of access and opportunity. They're showing that Jones had young athletes visiting regularly, that he had a particular way of greeting them, that he was alone with them in his apartment.
And the defence is saying: yes, all that happened, and nothing inappropriate occurred.
Exactly. The trial hinges on what happened behind closed doors, not on what the butler saw in the hallway.
Which is why the complainants' own testimony matters so much. They're the ones who have to describe what happened when the door closed.
How much longer does the trial have?
They're hearing from the final complainant when court resumes in October. After that, closing arguments, then the judge decides.
Il Polso
- Five men allege Jones sexually touched them without consent across nearly two decades, and the trial has now reached its eighth week with the weight of those claims pressing against a life lived largely in private.
- The butler's testimony introduced a telling detail — a greeting of hug, bottom-slap, and the word 'champion' — that sits uncomfortably between affection and allegation, and which Allan himself acknowledged may read differently in today's light.
- The apartment at Circular Quay emerges as a kind of sporting salon, hosting a who's who of Australian athletes, complicating any simple narrative about who was welcome there and why.
- Under cross-examination, Allan was unambiguous that he personally witnessed no inappropriate behaviour, offering the defence a clear but narrow foothold.
- With the final complainant's testimony scheduled for October 6, the trial moves toward its most consequential phase, leaving the jury to reconcile domestic normalcy with the gravity of what is alleged to have occurred within it.
In a Sydney courtroom, the domestic world of broadcaster Alan Jones has been opened to scrutiny through the testimony of the man who lived closest to its rhythms. David Allan, Jones's butler of nearly two decades, offered the court a portrait of a household defined by relentless routine and a steady procession of young male athletes — a portrait that neither condemns nor absolves, but illuminates the terrain on which five men's allegations must now be weighed. At eighty-five, Jones faces twenty-one charges he firmly denies, and the trial enters its final stretch with the last complainant yet to speak.
David Allan spent eighteen and a half years inside Alan Jones's life — cooking, cleaning, ironing, polishing, and moving through the broadcaster's luxury Circular Quay apartment with the quiet authority of long familiarity. When he took the stand at the Downing Centre this week, he carried with him the accumulated weight of nearly two decades of domestic observation, the kind of knowledge only a butler possesses.
The trial is now in its eighth week. Jones, eighty-five, faces twenty-one charges of indecent assault and sexual touching, all of which he denies. Allan was called to testify about the visits of a prominent athlete — referred to as complainant M — who alleges Jones touched him without consent on two occasions. When asked how Jones greeted the athlete, Allan's answer was plain: a hug, a slap on the bottom, and 'Hello, champion.' He paused, then added, 'Probably the wrong thing to say today, isn't it?' — a small acknowledgment of how the world had shifted around such gestures.
The apartment, Allan made clear, was no private retreat but a kind of salon for Australian sport. Cricketers, swimmers, rugby players — a steady stream of young men in their twenties passed through. Allan named Brett Lee, Steve Waugh, Freddie Flintoff, and others. The athlete in question visited eight or nine times, one among many.
Allan's own entry into Jones's employ had been almost comically understated. Asked at interview whether he could 'knock up a few sandwiches,' he replied, 'Crust on or crust off?' That was the negotiation. What followed was years of escalating demands, as lunches became dinners and weekends filled with entertaining, all while Jones ran on what Allan described as a brutal regime of barely two and a half hours of sleep.
Under cross-examination, defence barrister Claire O'Neill pressed Allan on whether he had ever witnessed inappropriate behaviour toward a male athlete. His answer was unequivocal: 'No, I can't say I did. No no, no.' His testimony offered context and pattern, but not proof of harm. Five men in total allege sexual touching without consent between 2003 and 2020. The final complainant is expected to testify when proceedings resume on October 6.
David Allan spent eighteen and a half years inside Alan Jones's life, moving through the broadcaster's luxury apartment at Circular Quay with the quiet authority of someone who knows where everything belongs. He cooked. He cleaned. He ironed socks and underpants. He polished shoes and scrubbed toilets. He watched his employer survive on two and a half hours of sleep a day, a man running on fumes and ambition. When Allan took the stand at the Downing Centre court in Sydney this week, he brought with him the accumulated weight of nearly two decades of domestic observation—the kind of knowledge that only a butler possesses, the small rituals and repeated gestures that fill a house when no one is watching.
The trial is now in its eighth week. Jones, eighty-five years old, faces twenty-one charges of indecent assault and sexual touching. He has pleaded not guilty to all of them. Allan was called to testify about what he witnessed during the visits of a prominent athlete, referred to in court as complainant M, who has alleged that Jones touched him without consent on two separate occasions. The athlete himself had already testified that Jones would greet him with a hug and a kiss on the cheek, using flattering language—"champion," "beautiful man"—the kind of words that can mean nothing or everything, depending on what comes next.
When prosecutor Georgina Wright asked Allan how Jones greeted the athlete upon arrival at the apartment, the butler's answer was direct: a hug and a slap on the bottom, followed by "Hello, champion." Then they would sit and talk. Allan paused after delivering this detail, seeming to recognize the weight of it. "Probably the wrong thing to say today, isn't it?" he offered, a small acknowledgment of how the world had shifted around such gestures. The athlete, Allan said, visited on eight or nine occasions. He was one of many. The apartment hosted cricketers, swimmers, rugby players—a steady stream of young men in their twenties, all moving through Jones's world. Allan named some of them: Brett Lee, Steve Waugh, Freddie Flintoff, Nick Farr-Jones, Johnathan Thurston. The place functioned as a kind of salon for Australian sport.
Allan's employment had begun simply enough. He remembered Jones asking him during the interview: "Can you knock up a few sandwiches?" Allan replied, "Crust on or crust off?" That was the entire negotiation. What followed was a life of escalating demands. Once Jones discovered that Allan could boil an egg, the entertaining began. Lunches became dinners. Dinners became Sunday roasts. Weekends filled with Saturday breakfasts when Jones was off air. The broadcaster maintained what Allan described as "a very hard, extraordinarily brutal regime of work hours," and his butler moved through it all, present but peripheral, always working, never sitting down to eat.
Allan recalled seeing Jones with a young male athlete at the apartment between 2003 and 2005. He said roughly half a dozen young athletes were regular visitors during that period. But when the defence barrister Claire O'Neill pressed him during cross-examination—asking whether he had witnessed any inappropriate behaviour by Jones toward a male athlete between 2003 and 2006—Allan was unequivocal. "No, I can't say I did," he said. "No no, no." His testimony offered a greeting, a pattern, a domestic context. It did not offer proof of harm.
Five men have come forward to allege that Jones touched them sexually without consent between 2003 and 2020. The trial will hear from the final complainant, known as A, when proceedings resume on Monday, October 6. The court has been sitting for eight weeks. Jones remains in the dock, eighty-five years old, denying everything. And Allan, the man who knew the texture of his employer's daily life better than almost anyone, has given his account and stepped down. The trial continues.
Citazioni salienti
It was always the same as all sports people seem to do today. It's a hug and a slap on the bottom … Hello, champion.— David Allan, describing Jones's greeting of the athlete
No, I can't say I did. No no, no.— David Allan, when asked under cross-examination if he witnessed inappropriate behaviour by Jones toward a male athlete between 2003 and 2006