Burnham's Push for Closer EU Ties Splits Labour and Unsettles Rival Parties Ahead of Brussels Summit

"We are racing to catch up with the public."
A cabinet minister's view of Labour's shift on Europe, as Burnham heads into Dublin and Brussels.
Mark

Why does this week matter so much for Burnham?

Mimi

Because three things land together: the Dublin meeting on Thursday, a foreign policy speech next week, and then the Brussels summit to sign deals on food, energy and youth mobility.

Mark

And the rejoining question sits behind all of that?

Mimi

Yes. He has opened the door to talk of the single market, freedom of movement and even the EU itself, and that is what splits his cabinet.

Luke

Worth being careful there. The reporting says he has opened the door to the argument. It doesn't say he has committed to rejoining anything.

Mark

Fair. Who is actually on his side?

Mimi

Angela Rayner is understood to have pushed Starmer to be bolder since autumn 2022, though she reportedly wants the manifesto red lines kept for now. An unnamed cabinet minister said the party is racing to catch up with the public.

Luke

Note "understood" and "said to be". Those are attributed accounts, and the minister isn't named.

Mark

What does Cameron's warning add?

Mimi

A negotiating argument: if the EU thinks Britain will rejoin anyway, it may offer a weaker partnership deal.

Luke

That's his prediction, not a demonstrated outcome. Nothing in the reporting shows how Brussels will actually behave.

Mark

Will Labour MPs rebel?

Mimi

Not yet. Two unhappy MPs say there are no plans for organised criticism, and call it wait and see.

Luke

And the claim that the truce breaks if polls slide is the reporter's assessment. It's plausible, but it's a forecast, not a fact.

  • Burnham has told his own Cabinet that the country ended up with a harder Brexit than voters chose, and the remark has set the government on edge.
  • Talk of rejoining the single market, and even the EU itself, has split Labour between enthusiastic MPs and ministers warning of high risk and high cost.
  • Rivals in the Conservatives and Reform are sharpening their attacks, with Reform calling for an election fought over a £40bn rejoining bill.
  • Labour dissent is simmering but silent, with MPs in a 'wait and see' mood that could break apart if the polls begin to slide.
  • The coming days bring a Dublin gathering, a foreign policy speech and a Brussels summit on food, energy and youth mobility, each a test of how far Burnham will go.

A prime minister who once stood on the far side of the Brexit argument now finds himself reopening it, not out of nostalgia but out of a belief that the settlement voters were promised has not delivered what it said it would. In a country still living with the consequences of a divisive referendum a decade on, his push for closer ties with Europe asks whether a political community can revisit an old decision without tearing itself apart. Whether that question becomes a national reckoning or a quiet recalibration will depend on the summits ahead and on how long his party's patience holds.

Andy Burnham chose his words carefully when he told Cabinet ministers that Britain had ended up with a harder Brexit than people voted for, and that the deal the Conservatives negotiated is not working. That single remark has turned a week already dominated by Europe into a test of how far his own party will follow him.

The calendar is crowded. Burnham will meet European leaders in Dublin, make a foreign policy speech in which Europe is a central theme, and travel to Brussels for a UK-EU summit where agreements on food, energy and youth mobility are expected. He has told ministers there is a significant prize to be won for people's living standards, and that reasoning lies behind his willingness to discuss rejoining the single market, with its freedom of movement, and even the EU itself.

Support comes from unexpected corners. Some MPs from Leave-voting constituencies welcome the honesty, and one minister declared that the public conversation has to catch up with the truth about Brexit's damage. Others are wary. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood warns of the costs and consequences of rejoining, and Jonathan Reynolds is uneasy about the terms and about a Europe where nationalist parties are rising. Lord Cameron has cautioned that even talk of rejoining could weaken Burnham's attempt to renegotiate the existing deal.

Labour's divisions cut across the usual lines. A Scottish MP who opposes Brexit questioned how the 2014 independence referendum could be treated as settled while the 2016 vote is not. Stoke-on-Trent's Gareth Snell warned that reopening the debate would consume parliamentary time. For now, no open rebellion has emerged, and the unhappiest MPs are simply waiting to see what happens.

The opposition is also positioning itself. Kemi Badenoch has made resistance to future EU alignment a firm line, while Conservative MPs fear the issue could reopen old wounds with voters they are trying to win back. Liberal Democrats worry about being drowned out, and Reform UK is eager for a fight. Over the coming days, the Dublin meeting, the speech and Brussels will reveal how much Burnham is prepared to say aloud, and whether his party's patience survives if the polls turn.

Andy Burnham chose his words for the Cabinet carefully earlier this week. He told ministers he firmly believed the country had ended up with a harder Brexit than people voted for, and that no sensible person thinks the deal the Tories negotiated is working for Britain. The remark has turned a week already given over to Europe into a test of how far his own party will follow him.

The calendar is full. On Thursday, at a gathering of European leaders in Dublin, the prime minister will for the first time meet people who could prove pivotal as he makes the case for Britain's future relationship with the bloc. Next week he will give a foreign policy speech in which Europe is, for Burnham, a central plank. He will then travel to Brussels for a UK-EU summit, where new agreements on food, energy and youth mobility are due to be signed. Of that deal he told ministers the government will take opportunities that make people better off, adding: "There is a significant prize."

That reasoning sits behind his decision to open the door to arguments about rejoining the EU single market, with the freedom of movement it would bring, and even the EU itself. It is this longer-term ambition that is dividing his cabinet and his party.

Some welcome it, including MPs whose constituencies once backed Brexit. Angela Rayner is understood to have pushed former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to be bolder on Brexit since at least autumn 2022. As housing secretary she is said to insist that Labour must keep to its manifesto red lines of no return to the single market, customs union or freedom of movement, while being open-minded about changing them at the next election. Another cabinet minister put it bluntly: the best thing in politics is to tell the truth, and the truth is that Brexit has been hugely damaging. "We are not leading a public conversation here," the minister said, "we are racing to catch up with the public."

Others are watching nervously. One former minister called the strategy "high risk". Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has struck a more cautious tone, warning of the "costs and consequences" of rejoining the EU as well as of staying out. Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds supports getting closer and discussing the long-term relationship, but has previously warned against joining the customs union. He is also unsure about rejoining, pointing to the uncertainty over what terms the UK would face and what the bloc might look like in years to come, with nationalist parties in the ascendancy in several European countries.

A voice from the past has its own concerns. Lord Cameron told Bloomberg's Mishal Husain that a conversation about rejoining would be "very long and painful". He warned that "flirting with rejoining" could undermine Burnham's efforts to renegotiate the Conservatives' Brexit deal, because EU countries might conclude Britain will rejoin anyway and see little point in offering a good partnership.

Within Labour, the divisions do not follow predictable lines. One Scottish Labour MP, personally opposed to Brexit and representing a heavily Remain-voting seat, called the approach a "real problem", asking how to argue that the 2014 Scottish referendum settled independence for a generation while the 2016 vote is not settled. Gareth Snell, MP for Stoke-on-Trent, where Leave won 69.4%, told the BBC's Westminster Hour that reopening the debate would monopolise time in parliament and government. So far there is no public rebellion. Two of the most unhappy Labour MPs said there are no plans for organised criticism and described their mindset as "wait and see". That truce is likely to fracture if Burnham's poll lead begins to slide.

The opposition parties are struggling to respond. Kemi Badenoch has made opposition to future alignment with EU rules a red line, saying it would "actually take us backwards". Yet some Conservative MPs fear the issue could again divide Tory voters, just as the party works to win back affluent southern voters who see Burnham's economic offer as too left-wing. One said those voters are only just giving the party a hearing again after Brexit, and will now be reminded of it. Some Liberal Democrats worry that their position as the most pro-European large party could be drowned out. Reform UK says it is "very bullish", with a strategist welcoming an election fought over a £40bn bill to rejoin, open-door immigration and less control over laws and courts.

The next few days, in Dublin, in the foreign policy speech and in Brussels, will show how much Burnham intends to say aloud, and whether his party's patience holds if the polls turn.

I firmly believe we have ended up with a harder Brexit than people voted for.
— Prime Minister Andy Burnham, to his Cabinet
Starting a conversation about rejoining would be very long and painful.
— Lord Cameron, to Bloomberg's Mishal Husain
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur BBC News ↗
Nous contacter FAQ