Britain's new prime minister, Andy Burnham, has opened a door that many had assumed was bricked up for good: he says he would welcome an honest, evidence-based debate on bringing back free movement with the European Union. The gesture sits uneasily beside the promises he made in his manifesto and on the campaign trail, and it reopens one of the most bruising questions of the Brexit years, the one that once turned on the simple matter of who may cross a border and why. As the country approaches a summit in Brussels, the question is whether a nation can revisit a settled verdict without first be
Burnham Opens Door to 'Honest Discussion' on Returning to EU Free Movement
"Revolving door migration where people would come and then go back is different."
Burnham hasn't proposed rejoining anything here, has he? Why is this causing such a stir?
He hasn't proposed it, no. But he's said he'd welcome an honest discussion about free movement, and he's floated membership or the single market, which would require it. That's enough to alarm people who see free movement as the thing Brexit settled.
Worth being exact. He's said he's open to a debate. He hasn't announced a policy, and he still backs the 2024 manifesto that ruled out free movement.
And he says any big change needs a general election mandate.
Right, which is due by 2029. So the debate is framed as a question put to voters, not a decision taken in Downing Street.
His argument is that the migration was different back then. Is that established?
It's his characterisation. He describes younger people staying a few years and going home, and says the balance has changed. The article offers no figures to test that, and Farage flatly disputes it.
What stands out is that he also concedes free movement had very significant challenges. He isn't selling it, he's asking for the evidence to be looked at.
Then there's Makerfield.
That's where the sharpest criticism lands. The seat voted Leave, and as a candidate he said he wasn't proposing to consider rejoining. Farage calls this a betrayal of that pitch.
Though Burnham's September BBC remark about going all the way toward rejoining came after that by-election. What's not clear from the reporting is whether he sees any contradiction, or what he'd say to that charge.
And what happens on 20 November?
He's expected to pitch options for a reset in Brussels. What those options are hasn't been spelled out yet.
Il Polso
- Prime Minister Burnham has told the Sunday Times he is open to a new relationship with Brussels that could mean single market membership, which would require free movement.
- Opposition leaders have reacted with fury, with Reform UK's Nigel Farage calling it a betrayal and vowing to fight it.
- Burnham is holding to Labour's 2024 manifesto, which ruled out free movement, and insists any major change needs a general election mandate.
- Burnham is set to present options for resetting EU relations at a 20 November Brussels summit, and the free movement fight is expected to sharpen before then.
Britain's new prime minister, Andy Burnham, has opened a door that many had assumed was bricked up for good: he says he would welcome an honest, evidence-based debate on bringing back free movement with the European Union. The gesture sits uneasily beside the promises he made in his manifesto and on the campaign trail, and it reopens one of the most bruising questions of the Brexit years, the one that once turned on the simple matter of who may cross a border and why. As the country approaches a summit in Brussels, the question is whether a nation can revisit a settled verdict without first being asked to reconsider it.
In an interview with the Sunday Times, Prime Minister Andy Burnham said he would welcome an honest discussion about bringing back free movement between the UK and the European Union. He wants a new relationship with Brussels that could include single market membership, and either route would require free movement. He insists the question should be settled by evidence rather than slogans, arguing that EU-era migration was largely younger people who came for a few years and went home, a "revolving door" that also served British people. He admits the system brought serious challenges, but he has ruled out joining the euro or Schengen.
His remarks sit uneasily with his own commitments. He stands by Labour's 2024 manifesto, which rejected free movement and the single market, and says major change needs a general election mandate. They also sit uneasily with his path to power: he won the Leave-voting seat of Makerfield at a June by-election, having promised not to re-run Brexit arguments.
The reaction was swift. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the British people had voted to end free movement and there could be no return. Nigel Farage called the comments a betrayal and vowed to fight them. With a Brussels summit on 20 November, where Burnham is expected to set out options for resetting ties, the argument is likely to grow louder.
In an interview with the Sunday Times, Prime Minister Andy Burnham said he would welcome an "honest discussion" about bringing back free movement between the UK and the European Union. He said he wants a new kind of relationship with Brussels, one that could include full EU membership or entry to the single market. Either route would require free movement.
He framed the question as one for evidence rather than slogans. "I think you have to have a very factual, quite evidence-based debate about this," he told the paper. He also argued that the migration of the EU years differed from what Britain faces now. In his account, it was generally younger people, though not always, who came for a few years and then went home, and that ease of movement worked for British people too. He called this "revolving door migration" and said the balance of migration has changed since then.
He did not play down the downsides. He acknowledged that freedom of movement "had very significant challenges associated with it." He also drew a limit. He said he could not see himself ever recommending anything that would involve joining the euro or Schengen, the passport-free travel zone. The UK never gave up the pound during its years of membership, though the bloc has pushed newer members toward the single currency.
The remarks sit awkwardly beside commitments he has already made. Burnham has said he stands by Labour's 2024 manifesto, which ruled out the return of free movement, single market membership and a customs union. He has said any fundamental change would need a mandate at a general election, which is due by 2029.
They also sit awkwardly beside his path to Downing Street. Burnham won the Greater Manchester seat of Makerfield at a by-election in June and became prime minister the following month. The constituency voted to leave the EU in 2016. As a candidate, he promised not to "re-run" Brexit arguments and said he was "not proposing that the UK considers rejoining the EU.\"
Reopening some of Britain's most sensitive political debates has been a feature of his first months in power. In a BBC interview in September, he said Britain could go "all the way" toward rejoining the EU. Migration dominated the 2016 referendum campaign, when the Leave side focused on rules allowing any EU citizen to move to the UK.
Opponents reacted sharply. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said free movement would amount to "handing back control of our borders and allowing uncontrolled migration from across Europe." He added: "The British people voted to end free movement, and there can be no return to it."
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage called the comments "a total betrayal of Brexit Britain and his Makerfield pitch." He also said Burnham was "deluded" to claim immigration was different during EU membership, and promised: "We will fight this dishonesty."
The interview came ahead of a summit with EU leaders in Brussels on 20 November. Burnham is expected to put forward options there for a reset of relations with the bloc. The argument over free movement is likely to sharpen before then.
Citazioni salienti
I think you have to have a very factual, quite evidence-based debate about this.— Andy Burnham, Sunday Times
The British people voted to end free movement, and there can be no return to it.— Chris Philp, shadow home secretary