Burnham 'Open' to Formal Apology for Slavery Ahead of Commonwealth Summit, but Rules Out Reparations

Open to an apology, closed to reparations
Burnham's position ahead of the Commonwealth summit in the Caribbean, as set out in The Guardian.
Mark

What actually changed in this announcement? Britain has said sorry-adjacent things before.

Mimi

The shift is that a Prime Minister is saying he is open to a formal apology on behalf of the state, and expressing personal sorrow and regret. That's more than just acknowledging history.

Luke

But careful, "open to" is not "will give." No apology has been promised, and no date or form has been named.

Mark

And reparations?

Mimi

Ruled out. He said British people today can't be held liable for wrongs from a different age under different laws in which they played no part.

Luke

That's the same policy his predecessors held, so on money nothing moves. Whether Caribbean leaders accept the alternative is not something this reporting tells us.

Mark

What is the alternative?

Mimi

A drive on debt-servicing so countries can repay over longer periods at better rates, plus support on renewable energy, girls' education, and a louder voice for smaller states.

Luke

Worth noting those are stated intentions. We don't have figures, terms, or which countries would benefit.

Mark

Who's carrying this at the summit?

Mimi

Chancellor John Healey, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband and Gordon Brown are joining him to work on it.

Luke

And the "structured dialogue" is so far a label. Who sits in it and how it runs hasn't been set out in what we have.

  • Caribbean nations are renewing their demands for Britain to apologise and pay reparations for its role in the slave trade, and the calls are growing louder while the King tours the region.
  • Andy Burnham has voiced personal sorrow and regret but has firmly ruled out reparation payments, insisting today's Britons cannot be held liable for past wrongs.
  • The Prime Minister is redirecting the debate toward a 'structured dialogue' with affected communities and a drive to ease debt repayments for struggling nations.
  • Chancellor John Healey, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband and Gordon Brown will carry the debt-servicing agenda into the Commonwealth heads of government meeting.
  • The open door on a formal state apology has not been committed to, and the Caribbean summit will reveal whether leaders accept debt relief in place of reparations.

Ahead of a gathering of Commonwealth leaders in the Caribbean, the British Prime Minister has chosen to meet an old and unresolved reckoning with a mix of personal sorrow and deliberate restraint. He has said he is willing to consider a formal apology for a trade that treated human beings as property and worked them to death, while declining to offer payments for wrongs committed by people long gone. It is an answer shaped by the weight of history and by the question of what a nation owes across generations, and it will be judged by whether words spoken in a distant sea-bound summit are followed by anything that changes lives.

Next week the Prime Minister flies to the Caribbean for the Commonwealth heads of government meeting, and before he goes he has laid out, in The Guardian, how he means to answer the question that has trailed the Commonwealth for years: what Britain owes for its part in the transatlantic slave trade.

His answer has two parts. He is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state, and he has spoken of his own sorrow and regret for a trade he called a brutal and barbaric violation, in which people were treated as property and worked to their deaths. He has not, however, opened the door to reparation payments. He said British people today cannot be held liable for wrongs done in a different age, under different laws, by people they never were.

The pressure behind this is real. Caribbean nations have repeated their demands for an apology and compensation, and those demands returned as the King toured the region. Burnham's answer is a 'structured dialogue' with affected communities, in which listening to calls for a state apology will play a part, though he has not committed to delivering one. He framed this as both a duty and an expression of national character, arguing that Britain, which led the world in abolition, can lead again.

In place of money, he has promised a drive on debt-servicing, to help countries repay over longer periods and at better rates, with Healey, Miliband and Gordon Brown joining the work at the summit. The wider package covers support for the shift to renewable energy, a greater voice for smaller nations, and efforts to educate women and girls and to tackle poverty and inequality.

Whether this offer will be enough is what the Caribbean meeting will test.

Next week, the Prime Minister is due to fly to the Caribbean for the Commonwealth heads of government meeting, known as Chogm. Before he goes, Andy Burnham has set out in the pages of The Guardian how he intends to handle the question that has followed the Commonwealth for years: what Britain owes for its part in the transatlantic slave trade.

His answer comes in two parts. He said he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state, and he expressed his own "sorrow and regret" for the suffering the trade caused. He ruled out reparation payments.

Burnham described the trade as a "brutal and barbaric violation" in which people were treated as property and worked to their deaths. He wrote that he wanted to express sorrow and regret for the pain and suffering of so many millions, and to recognise the way the trade still shapes the world today.

The article lands against a backdrop of pressure. Caribbean nations have renewed their calls for Britain to apologise for its role in selling enslaved people for profit, and to pay reparations. Those calls were made again as the King toured the region.

The Prime Minister's response is what he called a "structured dialogue" with those affected by the slave trade. Listening to calls for a formal state apology, he said, will form an important part of that process, and he is open to them. He did not commit to delivering one. He framed the effort as both a duty and a matter of national character. Having these difficult conversations to safeguard the Commonwealth's future, he wrote, is the right thing to do and also the patriotic thing to do, because the Britain he believes in is confident, decent and brave. Britain led the world in abolishing slavery, he argued, and can show leadership again.

On money, he kept to the line held by his predecessors. He acknowledged that some have called for financial reparations, but said he does not believe that is the right answer. His reasoning was that British people today cannot be held liable for historical wrongs, however heinous, that happened in a different age under different laws and in which they played no personal part.

In place of reparations, he said he would seek to launch a drive on debt-servicing, aimed at helping countries repay over a longer period and at better rates. Three figures will join him at the summit to help with that work: Chancellor John Healey, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband and former prime minister Gordon Brown.

The wider package includes UK support for countries making the transition to renewable energy, and for getting smaller nations heard on the world stage. It also covers work to educate women and girls and to tackle poverty and inequality.

The summit in the Caribbean is where the offer will be tested: whether leaders there accept dialogue and debt relief in place of reparations, and whether the open door on a formal apology leads to one.

I want to express my sorrow and regret for the pain and suffering of so many millions.
— Andy Burnham, writing in The Guardian
Some have called for financial reparations for the slave trade. I do not believe that is the right answer.
— Andy Burnham, writing in The Guardian
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Oxford Mail ↗
Contáctanos FAQ