On the eve of a journey to the Caribbean, Prime Minister Andy Burnham has offered something his predecessors largely withheld: a personal expression of sorrow for the transatlantic slave trade, and an openness to a formal apology from the British state. He has held firm, however, against reparations, reasoning that people living today cannot answer for wrongs committed under other laws in another age. The moment places a modern nation at the edge of an old reckoning, where the question is no longer only whether to acknowledge a past, but how far acknowledgment can travel before it must become
Burnham 'Open' to Formal Apology for Slavery Ahead of Caribbean Commonwealth Summit
"I am open to them," he said of calls for a formal apology
What actually changed here? Britain has talked about the slave trade before.
The personal register changed. The Prime Minister wrote that he feels sorrow and regret, and that he is open to a formal apology on behalf of the British state. That's more than a simple acknowledgement.
But 'open to' is carrying a lot. He hasn't promised an apology, and the reporting gives no date or form for one.
Fair. So what is he committing to?
A structured dialogue with those affected, and a debt-servicing drive to let countries repay over longer periods at better rates. Healey, Miliband and Gordon Brown are joining him at the summit for that work.
Worth noting we don't have details on what 'better rates' means in numbers. That's stated intent, not a programme.
And reparations?
He ruled them out. His argument is that people alive today can't be held liable for wrongs from a different age under different laws.
That's his stated reasoning, and it follows the line of previous prime ministers. How Caribbean leaders will respond isn't in this reporting, so we shouldn't guess.
So what do we watch for?
Whether the apology question moves from openness to a decision once the summit gets going.
Le Pouls
- Caribbean nations are pressing louder for an apology and reparations, their calls swelling while the King toured the region.
- Burnham has put personal sorrow into print, yet his openness to an apology stops short of any promise of when or whether it will come.
- Reparations are ruled out outright, leaving a sharp gap between what leaders have asked for and what the Prime Minister will concede.
- A proposed drive on debt-servicing and a 'structured dialogue' are being offered as alternatives, with Healey, Miliband and Brown set to carry the work to the Chogm summit.
- All eyes now turn to the Commonwealth meeting, where the offer will face its first real test and the open question of an apology must become either a commitment or a deferral.
On the eve of a journey to the Caribbean, Prime Minister Andy Burnham has offered something his predecessors largely withheld: a personal expression of sorrow for the transatlantic slave trade, and an openness to a formal apology from the British state. He has held firm, however, against reparations, reasoning that people living today cannot answer for wrongs committed under other laws in another age. The moment places a modern nation at the edge of an old reckoning, where the question is no longer only whether to acknowledge a past, but how far acknowledgment can travel before it must become commitment.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham has chosen a newspaper column, written ahead of a trip to the Caribbean, to say something his predecessors have not said so directly. He feels sorrow and regret for the transatlantic slave trade, and he is open to a formal apology from the British state. The piece ran in The Guardian, just days before he is due to attend the Commonwealth heads of government meeting, Chogm, in the region.
He called the trade a "brutal and barbaric violation" in which millions of people were treated as property and worked to their deaths. He wrote that the legacy still shapes the world today. The words are personal, set down in his own name rather than in an official government statement.
His answer on an apology is open but not final. The government is offering a "structured dialogue" with those affected, and he said listening to calls for an apology on behalf of the British state will be part of it. He did not say an apology will be made, or when.
On reparations, he rejected financial payments outright, holding that British people today cannot be held liable for wrongs done in a different age, under different laws, in which they played no personal part. In their place he proposed a drive on debt-servicing, to help countries repay over longer periods and at better rates. The Chancellor, Foreign Secretary and former prime minister Gordon Brown will join him at the summit to carry that work.
He framed the whole approach as a matter of national character, calling it the right and patriotic thing to do, for a Britain that is "confident, decent and brave." At the summit, the true test will be whether the offer satisfies leaders who have asked for more, and whether openness to an apology becomes a promise.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham has chosen a newspaper column, ahead of a trip to the Caribbean, to say what he has not said before: that he feels sorrow and regret for the transatlantic slave trade, and that he is open to a formal apology from the British state. The piece ran in The Guardian, days before he is due to attend the Commonwealth heads of government meeting, known as Chogm, in the region.
He described the trade as a "brutal and barbaric violation" in which people were treated as property and worked to their deaths. He wrote that he wanted to express sorrow and regret for the pain and suffering of so many millions, and to recognise that the legacy still shapes the world today. The words are personal, set down in his own name rather than in a government statement.
The timing follows renewed calls from Caribbean nations for Britain to apologise for its part in selling enslaved people for profit, and to pay reparations. Those calls grew louder as the King toured the region.
Burnham's answer on the apology is open but not final. He said the government is offering a "structured dialogue" with those affected by the slave trade, and that listening to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state will form an important part of that process. "I am open to them," he said. He did not say that an apology will be made, or when.
On reparations, his position matches that of his predecessors. He rejected financial payments outright, writing that he does not believe they are the right answer. In his view, British people today cannot be held liable for historical wrongs, however heinous, that took place in a different age, under different laws, and in which they played no personal part.
In place of payments, he proposed a drive on debt-servicing, intended to help countries repay over a longer period and at better rates. Three figures will join him at the summit to help with that work: Chancellor John Healey, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband and former prime minister Gordon Brown.
The UK, he said, will also support countries in the transition to renewable energy, work to get smaller countries heard on the world stage, and back efforts to educate women and girls and to tackle poverty and inequality.
He framed the whole approach as a matter of national character. Having these difficult conversations to safeguard the Commonwealth's future, he wrote, is the right thing to do and also the patriotic thing, because the Britain he believes in is "confident, decent and brave." He noted that Britain led the world in abolishing slavery and argued it can show leadership again.
At the Caribbean summit, the test will be whether the offer of dialogue and debt relief satisfies leaders who have asked for an apology and reparations, and whether the stated openness to an apology turns into a commitment.
Citations marquantes
I want to express my sorrow and regret for the pain and suffering of so many millions.— Andy Burnham, writing in The Guardian
Some have called for financial reparations for the slave trade. I do not believe that is the right answer.— Andy Burnham