Ahead of a gathering of Commonwealth leaders in the Caribbean, the British Prime Minister has taken up one of the oldest and heaviest questions in the country's relationship with the region: what a nation owes for the crimes of its past. He has offered personal sorrow for the transatlantic slave trade and left the door open to a formal apology from the state, while closing it firmly on payments, on the grounds that people living today cannot be made to answer for wrongs they never committed. The answer he sets out is a reckoning that seeks to honour memory and rebuild trust without settling ac
Burnham Open to Formal Apology for Slave Trade Ahead of Commonwealth Summit, but Rules Out Reparations
The patriotic thing to do
So what did Burnham actually commit to here?
Less than a headline might suggest. He said he is open to calls for a formal apology from the British state, and he offered a structured dialogue. He personally expressed sorrow and regret. But he didn't announce an apology.
Worth holding onto that distinction. "Open to" is not "will deliver." Nothing in the reporting says an apology is scheduled or what form it would take.
And reparations?
Ruled out. He said present-day Britons can't be held liable for wrongs from a different age under different laws, in which they played no part. It matches the stance of his predecessors.
Why does the debt-servicing idea matter, then?
It's his alternative. Longer repayment periods and better rates for countries. He's bringing Healey, Miliband and Gordon Brown to the summit to work on it.
But we only have his description of it. No detail on which countries, what rates, or how much. It's an intention, not a programme yet.
How does the Caribbean context fit?
Caribbean nations renewed calls for both an apology and reparations while the King toured the region. This article lands right in the middle of that.
And we don't yet have any Caribbean leader's response in this piece. Whether they see debt help as an adequate answer is unknown.
Le Pouls
- Caribbean nations are pressing Britain, as the King tours the region, to apologise for its role in the slave trade and to pay reparations.
- The Prime Minister has opened the door to a formal apology but has refused to pay reparations, a split that is likely to be felt sharply in the room.
- Burnham is framing the apology as 'the patriotic thing to do', casting a moral reckoning as a test of national character.
- A drive on debt-servicing, backed by Healey, Miliband and Brown, is being offered in place of compensation, and its reception will decide whether the gesture feels sufficient.
- Chogm will show whether openness to an apology hardens into a formal one or stays a matter of further consideration.
Ahead of a gathering of Commonwealth leaders in the Caribbean, the British Prime Minister has taken up one of the oldest and heaviest questions in the country's relationship with the region: what a nation owes for the crimes of its past. He has offered personal sorrow for the transatlantic slave trade and left the door open to a formal apology from the state, while closing it firmly on payments, on the grounds that people living today cannot be made to answer for wrongs they never committed. The answer he sets out is a reckoning that seeks to honour memory and rebuild trust without settling accounts in money, and whether that balance will hold is a question the coming summit will begin to answer.
Andy Burnham used the pages of The Guardian to lay out his government's position on Britain's part in the transatlantic slave trade, ahead of the Commonwealth heads of government meeting he will attend in the Caribbean next week. He wrote in personal terms, calling the trade a "brutal and barbaric violation" in which people were treated as property and worked to their deaths, and he said he wanted to express his own sorrow and regret for the suffering of millions.
The timing gives the words weight. Caribbean nations have renewed their demands for an apology and for reparations while the King is touring the region, and Burnham's piece answers both, but not in the same way. He said he is open to calls for a formal apology from the British state and sees listening to those calls as part of a structured dialogue with those affected. He did not announce that an apology will be made, only that it is under consideration.
On reparations he kept to the line of his predecessors. He wrote that he does not believe financial payments are the right answer, because people alive today cannot be held liable for wrongs done in another age, under other laws, in which they took no part. In their place he will push a drive to help countries repay debts over longer periods and at better rates, with Chancellor John Healey, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband and former prime minister Gordon Brown joining him at the summit.
What happens at Chogm will show whether his openness to an apology becomes a formal one, and how Caribbean leaders, who asked for reparations, receive an offer built on debt terms rather than compensation.
Andy Burnham chose the pages of The Guardian to set out where his government stands on one of the hardest questions in Britain's relationship with the Caribbean. Ahead of the Commonwealth heads of government meeting, known as Chogm, which he is due to attend in the region next week, the Prime Minister wrote that he is "open" to calls for Britain to formally apologise for its part in the transatlantic slave trade. He ruled out financial reparations.
The article was personal in tone. Burnham described the trade as a "brutal and barbaric violation" in which people were "treated as property and worked to their deaths." He wrote that he wanted to express his own "sorrow and regret" for the pain and suffering of so many millions, and to recognise the way that history still shapes the world today.
The timing matters. Caribbean nations have renewed their calls for Britain to apologise for its role in selling enslaved people for profit, and to pay reparations, as the King toured the region. Burnham's piece is the government's answer to both demands, and it treats them differently.
On the apology, he offered what he called a "structured dialogue" with those affected by the slave trade. Listening to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state, he said, will form an important part of that process, and he is open to them. He did not announce that an apology would be made, only that it is under consideration. He framed the effort as a matter of national character: having these difficult conversations to safeguard the Commonwealth's future is, he wrote, "the right thing to do" and also "the patriotic thing to do." The Britain he believes in, he said, is confident, decent and brave, and one that led the world in abolishing slavery and can show leadership again.
On reparations, he held the line of his predecessors. "Some have called for financial reparations for the slave trade. I do not believe that is the right answer," he wrote. His reasoning was that British people today cannot be held liable for historical wrongs, however heinous, which happened in a different age under different laws and in which they played no personal part.
In place of payments, Burnham said he would seek to launch a drive on debt-servicing, aimed at helping countries repay over a longer period and at better rates. Three figures will join him at the summit to help with that work: Chancellor John Healey, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband and former prime minister Gordon Brown.
The UK, he said, will also back countries in the transition to renewable energy and in getting smaller nations heard on the world stage. It will support work to educate women and girls and to tackle poverty and inequality.
What to watch at Chogm is whether the stated openness to an apology turns into a formal one, and how Caribbean leaders, who have asked for reparations, receive a package built around debt terms rather than compensation.
Citations marquantes
I want to express my sorrow and regret for the pain and suffering of so many millions.— Andy Burnham, writing in The Guardian
Listening to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state will form an important part of this process and I am open to them.— Andy Burnham, Prime Minister