BRICS leaders call for 'maximum restraint' in Middle East amid Iran-US tensions

The Middle East war has caused serious losses to people across the region, with ongoing US-Iran military strikes resuming after an August pause.
A statement that names no country, condemning war in general terms
BRICS members achieved rare consensus on the Middle East by using language so carefully worded that each side could interpret it differently.
Mark

So they got a joint statement out of BRICS on the Middle East. That seems like a win. What's actually in it?

Mimi

It calls for "maximum restraint" and expresses deep concern over escalating tensions. But here's the thing—it doesn't name any country. It condemns unilateral warfare in general terms.

Luke

Which means it's vague enough that Iran can read it one way and the UAE another. How much teeth does that actually have?

Mimi

That's the real question. For six months, BRICS couldn't agree on anything about this war. Three of their own members are directly involved—Iran on one side, the UAE and Saudi Arabia on the other. Getting them to sign the same document at all is a diplomatic achievement.

Mark

Why did it take so long? What changed?

Mimi

Modi needed a win. India chairs BRICS this year, and a summit without a joint declaration looks like failure. So there was real pressure to find language everyone could live with.

Luke

But "everyone could live with" isn't the same as "everyone agrees." The statement is so carefully worded that it might mean nothing. Has anyone actually committed to anything?

Mimi

They've committed to dialogue and diplomacy, and to avoiding actions that aggravate the situation. Whether that translates into actual restraint is another matter.

Mark

What about the bigger picture? Xi showing up in India for the first time in seven years—what's that about?

Mimi

It signals that both India and China want to manage their relationship within BRICS, despite their border disputes and trade imbalances. Xi's visit is a gesture of normalizing ties after the 2020 clash.

Luke

But normalizing doesn't mean the problems go away. India imports $131 billion from China and exports $20 billion. That's a massive imbalance. And they still have troops facing each other across a 3,500-kilometer border.

Mark

So Modi is trying to balance China, the US, Iran, Russia—all at once?

Mimi

Exactly. He can't afford to alienate Washington, but he needs China. And he has to keep Iran and the UAE from tearing BRICS apart. It's a high-wire act.

Luke

The question is whether BRICS can actually do anything meaningful when its own members are at war with each other. A joint declaration that names no names might just be theater.

  • A war involving three BRICS members on opposing sides had paralyzed the bloc for six months, making any joint statement seem out of reach.
  • US-Iran military strikes resumed after an August pause, deepening regional suffering and threatening the maritime trade routes and energy flows that developing economies depend on.
  • Xi Jinping's first visit to India since 2019 injected both symbolic weight and strategic tension into the summit, with a $131 billion trade imbalance and unresolved Himalayan border disputes shadowing every handshake.
  • The unanimous declaration — condemning unilateral warfare without naming Washington or Tehran — represents the bloc's attempt to speak with moral authority while preserving the internal consensus it desperately needs.
  • Beneath the diplomatic choreography, BRICS nations are quietly accelerating a shift away from dollar-denominated trade, driven not by ideology but by the practical sting of sanctions, frozen reserves, and financial exposure to American policy.

In New Delhi, eleven nations spanning half the world's population found rare common ground — not through shared ideology, but through the quiet pressure of shared consequence. The BRICS summit produced a unanimous declaration urging restraint in the Middle East, a diplomatic achievement made more remarkable by the fact that three of its signatories — Iran, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia — are themselves parties to the conflict. India's Modi, hosting Xi Jinping for the first time in seven years, navigated a summit where the architecture of a shifting world order was being quietly assembled, one bilateral meeting and local-currency trade deal at a time.

The BRICS summit in New Delhi delivered what six months of fractured diplomacy had failed to produce: a unified statement on the Middle East war. Indian Prime Minister Modi announced that all eleven member nations had adopted a joint declaration calling for 'maximum restraint,' expressing deep concern over escalating hostilities while carefully avoiding naming any country responsible. The achievement was fragile by design — Iran, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia all signed, despite the fact that Iran has attacked the other two, viewing them as American proxies.

China's Xi Jinping, making his first visit to India since 2019, framed the conflict in terms of collective interest rather than blame, telling state media that the war served no one and urging the bloc to stand 'on the right side of history.' His presence in New Delhi carried meaning beyond the declaration itself — the two nuclear-armed neighbors, whose relations froze after a deadly 2020 border clash, were signaling a cautious willingness to manage their rivalry within the BRICS framework, even as $131 billion in bilateral trade flows almost entirely in China's favor.

Modi spent the summit's margins in a careful balancing act: urging Iran's President Pezeshkian to resolve disputes through dialogue, pressing Putin to end the Ukraine war, and reinforcing strategic ties with the UAE's Crown Prince. The declaration also took aim at rising unilateral tariffs and sanctions — a pointed, if unnamed, critique of US economic pressure on Iran and Russia — and stressed the need to protect global trade, supply chains, and energy flows that the Global South depends on.

Running beneath the summit's diplomatic surface was a longer-term project: reducing exposure to the American financial system. BRICS nations are increasingly settling trade in local currencies — rupees, rubles, yuan — not as a coordinated assault on the dollar, but as a pragmatic hedge against sanctions, frozen reserves, and dollar-denominated vulnerability. The shift is incremental and bilateral, one deal at a time, but its direction is clear: a world in which financial risk is spread across multiple systems, and Western leverage over the Global South grows a little less absolute.

The BRICS summit in New Delhi produced something its members had struggled to achieve for months: a unified statement on the Middle East war. On the first day of the gathering, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that all eleven member nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia—had adopted a joint declaration calling for "maximum restraint" in the region. The statement expressed deep concern over escalating tensions and urged all parties to avoid actions that could worsen the situation, though it conspicuously avoided naming any country or side.

The breakthrough mattered because BRICS had been fractured on this issue for six months. The bloc represents roughly half the world's population and accounts for about forty percent of global economic output when measured by purchasing power, yet it had failed to issue any joint statement on the Middle East conflict since the US and Israeli strikes on Iran in late February. The war directly involves three BRICS members—Iran, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia—but not as allies. Iran has attacked the UAE and Saudi Arabia, viewing them as American proxies. The divisions ran deep enough that reaching consensus seemed nearly impossible.

China's President Xi Jinping, visiting India for the first time since 2019, underscored Beijing's position that the war serves no one's interests. Speaking to state media, Xi said the conflict had caused serious losses across the region and did not align with the common interests of the international community. He called on BRICS members to work together toward peace and stability in the Middle East and Gulf region, and urged the bloc to stand "on the right side of history" as power politics rise and the international order faces challenge. The statement represented a careful diplomatic formulation—condemning unilateral warfare without pointing fingers at Washington or Tehran.

Modi's success in securing the declaration came as he juggled competing pressures from bloc members with conflicting interests. In bilateral meetings on the summit's sidelines, he met with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and emphasized that all disputes must be resolved through dialogue and diplomacy. He also stressed the need to protect maritime trade, a concern for Iran given US sanctions and military pressure. When Modi met with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the two discussed the Middle East conflict alongside the Ukraine war, with Modi again urging Putin to end the fighting in Eastern Europe. The Indian prime minister was simultaneously managing talks with the UAE's Crown Prince Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed, reinforcing the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership between the two nations.

The declaration also addressed broader economic grievances. BRICS members expressed concern about rising unilateral tariffs and non-tariff measures that distort global trade, a direct reference to US sanctions against Iran and Russia. The bloc stressed the need for cooperation to maintain smooth flows of global trade, supply chains, and energy—issues that hit the Global South, which BRICS claims to represent, particularly hard. Oil and fertilizer disruptions from the Middle East war have threatened food security across developing economies.

Xi's presence in New Delhi carried additional weight beyond the Middle East statement. His meeting with Modi, scheduled for late afternoon on the first day, marked a significant moment in the cautious thaw between two nuclear-armed Asian powers whose relations froze after a deadly 2020 border clash in Ladakh's Galwan Valley. The two leaders were expected to discuss bilateral trade and their disputed 3,500-kilometer border along Kashmir and Tibet. India and China maintain heavy military deployments along this frontier, and deep mistrust persists despite recent diplomatic gestures. Yet the very fact that Xi was visiting—his first trip to India in seven years—signaled both nations' interest in managing their rivalry within the BRICS framework.

The trade imbalance between India and China loomed over their talks. Bilateral commerce reached $151 billion in the 2025-26 financial year, making China India's largest trading partner, but the gap was stark: India imported $131 billion in Chinese goods while exporting only $20 billion. Modi's government has also been navigating a delicate position between Washington and Beijing. While the US president threatened India with sanctions for doing business with Iran and Russia, he was simultaneously courting Xi. India needed to deepen ties with China without drifting too far from the United States, where a trade agreement remained pending and where Indian industry depended on American technology.

Beyond the immediate diplomatic choreography, BRICS leaders were pursuing a longer-term challenge to Western financial dominance. Talk of "de-dollarization" filled the summit, though experts cautioned the reality was more modest. BRICS members were increasingly settling bilateral trade in local currencies rather than dollars—a shift driven less by ideology than by practical concerns. US sanctions, tariffs, and the freezing of foreign reserves had pushed countries across the Global South to reconsider their exposure to the American financial system. By trading directly in rupees, rubles, yuan, and other local currencies, developing economies could reduce transaction costs, speed payments, and lower their reliance on dollar-denominated debt. India itself had historical precedent: it had run a rupee-ruble trading arrangement with the Soviet Union decades earlier. The shift represented not a coordinated campaign to topple the dollar but a pragmatic hedge, spreading financial risk across multiple currencies and systems, one bilateral deal at a time.

The war has caused serious losses to people across the region and does not serve the common interests of the international community.
— Chinese President Xi Jinping, speaking to state media at the BRICS summit
All issues must be resolved through dialogue and diplomacy.
— Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in remarks to Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Deutsche Welle ↗
Contáctanos FAQ