Brazil's polarized election heads to runoff as Bolsonaro leads Lula in first round

People will have to choose between strengthening democracy and barbarism.
Lula's framing of the election as a choice between democratic governance and authoritarianism, spoken as he voted in his political birthplace.
Mark

So neither candidate got to 50 percent. What does that actually mean for what happens next?

Mimi

It means they go to a runoff on October 25. Flávio was ahead in the partial count—49.8 to Lula's 42.25—but that's not enough to win outright. They'll have three weeks to campaign again.

Luke

But we should be clear: those are partial results from about 65 percent of the country. The final margin could shift. We don't know yet if Flávio's lead holds.

Mark

What's the actual difference between them politically?

Mimi

Lula is leftwing, focused on social programs and protecting the Amazon and Indigenous rights. Flávio is far-right, aligned with Trump, and his father—the former president—is in prison for attempting a coup.

Luke

That's the framing, yes. But it's worth noting that Lula also faces corruption allegations that are still being investigated, and there's been a supreme court scandal that's fueling anti-incumbent sentiment even though it's not directly connected to him.

Mark

Why is Flávio even competitive if his father is in prison for a coup attempt?

Mimi

Because his father lost to Lula by less than two percentage points in 2022. That voter base didn't disappear—it consolidated behind Flávio. He inherited the machinery.

Luke

And there's also an anti-Lula vote that's separate from pro-Flávio sentiment. Some people are voting against the incumbent, not necessarily for the challenger.

Mark

What about the regional context? Why does this matter beyond Brazil?

Mimi

Brazil is one of the last large leftwing governments in Latin America. Most of the region has swung right. If Flávio wins, it's another shift away from the left.

Luke

Though we should note that Lula himself has accused the U.S. president of interfering to help Bolsonaro. That's a serious claim, but it's one person's assertion. We don't have independent confirmation of that.

Mark

What happens if Lula loses?

Mimi

Flávio has pledged to join a U.S.-led anti-drug coalition and align more closely with Trump. Indigenous protections and Amazon policy would likely shift significantly.

Luke

Those are his stated positions. Whether he follows through, and how, would depend on Congress and the courts—Brazil's institutions aren't powerless here.

  • With nearly two-thirds of votes counted, Flávio Bolsonaro leads at 49.8% to Lula's 42.25%, but neither man has won outright, forcing a second round on October 25.
  • The race has become a proxy war for the hemisphere's soul — Lula stands as one of the last major leftwing leaders in a region tilting sharply rightward, while Flávio carries his imprisoned father's political machine and close ties to Donald Trump.
  • Corruption scandals shadow both camps: Flávio was caught on tape soliciting millions to fund a film about his father, while Lula faces ongoing investigations involving his son and a former aide.
  • Voters in the Amazon and Indigenous communities fear that a Bolsonaro victory would dismantle hard-won environmental and human rights protections, echoing the damage done during Jair Bolsonaro's presidency.
  • The runoff will now hinge on consolidating fragmented conservative and progressive voters alike, with democracy versus authoritarianism emerging as the defining frame of the campaign's final weeks.

On a Sunday evening in October, Brazil's fractured electorate delivered an inconclusive verdict — neither the aging leftist incumbent Lula nor the far-right dynastic challenger Flávio Bolsonaro crossing the threshold of outright victory. The result is less a political outcome than a mirror held up to a nation, and a hemisphere, in the midst of an identity crisis about what governance, democracy, and belonging should mean. A runoff on October 25 will now ask Brazilians to choose again — this time with fewer illusions about what each path carries.

Brazil's first-round presidential vote closed on Sunday without a winner. Partial results showed Flávio Bolsonaro — son of the imprisoned former president Jair — leading incumbent Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva by roughly seven percentage points, but neither man cleared the 50% threshold required for outright victory. A runoff was confirmed for October 25.

The contest had long felt less like a conventional election than a reckoning. Lula, now 80 and seeking an unprecedented fourth term, cast himself as a bulwark against authoritarianism in a hemisphere that has swung decisively to the right. Flávio, 45, ran as the direct heir to his father's political movement — a movement that had nearly seized power by force after Jair Bolsonaro lost to Lula in 2022 by less than two percentage points. That narrow prior defeat meant the Bolsonaro base remained formidable, and it consolidated behind Flávio despite earlier speculation about other rightwing contenders.

Both candidates carried significant liabilities. Flávio was caught on tape requesting $26.8 million from a banker to finance a film lionizing his father. Lula, meanwhile, faced corruption investigations involving his son and a former aide, and a separate supreme court scandal had fed a broader anti-establishment sentiment that worked against him. Yet Lula also had a record to defend: strong social programs, improved economic indicators, and expanded protections for Indigenous peoples and the Amazon.

When Lula voted Sunday morning in São Bernardo do Campo — the industrial city where his political life began five decades ago — he framed the choice in unambiguous terms: democracy or barbarism. Flávio, voting in Rio de Janeiro, urged supporters of other rightwing candidates to rally behind him as a unified protest against the incumbent.

The election carried consequences well beyond the presidency. Brazilians simultaneously chose governors, all federal congress members, and dozens of senators. And for communities in the Amazon, the stakes were visceral — one voter there, who asked to remain anonymous out of fear of her local government, said she was voting for Lula specifically to protect Indigenous rights and the forest itself, which she believed a Bolsonaro administration would dismantle. The runoff will now determine not only Brazil's direction, but its weight in a region where the left has few remaining footholds.

The polls closed on Sunday evening in Brazil's first round of presidential voting, and the results delivered exactly what the nation's fractured electorate had been threatening all along: a dead heat that will force a second round. With ballots counted from nearly two-thirds of the country, Jair Bolsonaro's son Flávio was ahead, claiming 49.8 percent to incumbent Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's 42.25 percent. Neither man had crossed the 50-percent threshold required to claim victory outright. A runoff was set for October 25.

The race itself had become a referendum on Brazil's place in a rapidly shifting hemisphere. Lula, now 80, was seeking his fourth non-consecutive term as president and had positioned himself as one of the last remaining leftwing leaders in a region that had swung decisively rightward. He had recently accused the American president of meddling in Brazil's election to help Bolsonaro. Flávio, 45, was running as the heir to his father's political machine—his father Jair, the former president, is currently serving a 27-year sentence for attempting a coup after losing his re-election bid in 2022. Flávio had cultivated close ties to Donald Trump and pledged to join a U.S.-led anti-drug coalition that had already killed dozens of people in airstrikes across the region.

The campaign had been shaped by the transfer of an existing voter base as much as by any fresh political argument. When Jair Bolsonaro lost to Lula in 2022, he had fallen short by less than two percentage points. That narrow margin meant his supporters remained a potent force, and many of them had consolidated behind his son despite earlier speculation that they might have preferred other rightwing candidates—the São Paulo governor Tarcísio de Freitas, or even Jair's former wife Michelle. The senator had also weathered a corruption scandal in which he was caught on tape asking a banker for $26.8 million to finance a film about his father. Yet he remained competitive, buoyed by what analysts described as a straightforward inheritance of his father's political machinery combined with a broader anti-incumbent sentiment.

Lula's position, meanwhile, had been complicated by his own vulnerabilities. Corruption allegations involving his son and a former aide were still under investigation. A separate scandal involving supreme court justices, though unconnected to the president himself, had fueled what observers called an "anti-system" vote that worked against him. Yet he had also delivered measurable results: strong social and economic indicators, and programs that had reached Brazil's poorest citizens. When he voted on Sunday morning in São Bernardo do Campo, the industrial city where his political career had begun nearly fifty years earlier, he framed the choice starkly. "People will have to choose between strengthening democracy and barbarism," he said.

Flávio, voting in Rio de Janeiro's north zone, had appealed directly to supporters of other rightwing candidates to consolidate behind him as a "protest vote" against Lula. He claimed his internal polling showed movement in his direction among voters who had initially backed other conservative candidates. A workshop manager named Claudinei Ferreira Viana, 45, from Paraná state, exemplified this logic. "My first choice would be Jair Bolsonaro," he said, "but since he is under house arrest and there is no other rightwing candidate strong enough to take on the current president, I'm going with Flávio."

The stakes extended far beyond the presidency. Brazilians were also electing 27 state governors, all 513 federal congress members, 54 of the country's 81 senators, and members of state legislatures. The outcome would shape not only Brazil's domestic direction but its regional influence at a moment when leftwing governments had become rare in Latin America. Venezuela had fallen to a U.S.-backed takeover after the capture of Nicolás Maduro. Brazil remained one of the few large countries in the hemisphere still governed from the left.

For some voters, the choice turned on specific policy consequences. A 40-year-old woman working in Amazonas state, who asked to be identified only by her initials out of fear of reprisals from her conservative local government, said she would vote for Lula because of his programs supporting vulnerable populations. She also cited his efforts to strengthen protections for Indigenous peoples and the Amazon itself—protections she believed would be "seriously threatened" if Flávio Bolsonaro came to power, given his father's record of weakening such safeguards. The runoff would now become a campaign to persuade the undecided and to mobilize the base, with democracy itself emerging as the central argument.

People will have to choose between strengthening democracy and barbarism.
— Lula, voting in São Bernardo do Campo
My first choice would be Jair Bolsonaro but, since he is under house arrest and there is no other rightwing candidate strong enough to take on the current president, I'm going with Flávio.
— Claudinei Ferreira Viana, workshop manager in Paraná state
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur The Guardian ↗
Nous contacter FAQ