In the shadow of a documented assassination attempt against one of India's most recognizable figures, the Bombay High Court reminded the state on February 6, 2025, that proximity to suspicion is not the same as proof of guilt. Two men accused of participating in an alleged plot against actor Salman Khan were ordered released, the court finding their only traceable connection to the conspiracy was membership in a WhatsApp group. The ruling does not dissolve the larger investigation into the Lawrence Bishnoi gang, which police say spans eighteen members and reaches across international borders —
Bombay HC Grants Bail to Two in Salman Khan Murder Plot, Cites Insufficient Evidence
Except this, no recovery of incriminating material has been found
Why would the court release them if there's an active murder plot against Salman Khan?
Because bail isn't about guilt or innocence—it's about whether the evidence is strong enough to hold someone before trial. The judge found they were in a group chat, but that alone doesn't prove they did anything.
So the WhatsApp group was the only real evidence?
Essentially, yes. No weapons, no surveillance footage of them doing reconnaissance, no messages showing they planned anything. Just membership in a chat where others discussed it.
Does this mean the whole investigation is falling apart?
Not necessarily. The investigation into the Bishnoi gang itself is still active. But it suggests the police may have cast too wide a net, arresting people on thin grounds.
What about the shooting in April? That actually happened.
It did. Two gang members fired at Khan's apartment. But proving these two men were part of that—that's what the court said the state hadn't done.
So they could still be charged later if better evidence emerges?
Technically yes, but bail rulings like this often signal the case against them is weak. The judge's language was pretty clear about the lack of substance.
Der Puls
- An April 2024 shooting outside Salman Khan's Bandra apartment made the threat against his life concrete and undeniable, raising the stakes of every arrest that followed.
- Two suspects spent months in detention on the strength of a WhatsApp group membership — a thread the High Court ultimately found too thin to hold the charge of conspiracy.
- Defense lawyers argued the arrests were engineered for headlines, pointing to a prior bail granted to a co-accused as evidence of a prosecution built on spectacle rather than substance.
- The broader investigation still implicates eighteen alleged gang members, with threads running to Pakistan arms procurement, AK-47 purchases, and a planned escape route through Sri Lanka to Kanyakumari.
- The bail order frees two men but leaves the case unresolved — the gang's alleged network remains under scrutiny, and the threat to Khan has not been officially declared neutralized.
In the shadow of a documented assassination attempt against one of India's most recognizable figures, the Bombay High Court reminded the state on February 6, 2025, that proximity to suspicion is not the same as proof of guilt. Two men accused of participating in an alleged plot against actor Salman Khan were ordered released, the court finding their only traceable connection to the conspiracy was membership in a WhatsApp group. The ruling does not dissolve the larger investigation into the Lawrence Bishnoi gang, which police say spans eighteen members and reaches across international borders — it simply insists that the law must be built on evidence, not on the weight of a famous name.
On February 6, 2025, a Bombay High Court judge ordered the release of two men held in connection with an alleged plot to assassinate Bollywood actor Salman Khan. Gaurav Bhatia and Waspi Mehmud Khan had been arrested after police accused them of conducting surveillance near Khan's farmhouse in Panvel, his Bandra apartment, and various film sets during 2024 — activities authorities linked to a conspiracy organized by the Lawrence Bishnoi gang.
Justice N R Borkar found the prosecution's case fundamentally lacking. The only evidence tying the two men to the alleged conspiracy was their presence in a WhatsApp group where the plot was discussed. No weapons were recovered, no direct communications established their involvement, and the group's messages were too vague to implicate either man in any specific act. The court's conclusion was clear: association is not guilt.
The defense had pressed this point throughout, arguing the charges were inflated for media attention. They noted that another accused, Deepak Gogoi, had already been granted bail by a sessions court in 2024, and that neither Bhatia nor Khan had any documented ties to the Bishnoi gang itself.
The wider investigation tells a more alarming story. Police have identified eighteen alleged gang members in the conspiracy. In April 2024, two of them fired shots outside Khan's Bandra residence in what authorities called a direct assassination attempt. The FIR names Lawrence Bishnoi — imprisoned in Ahmedabad — along with his fugitive brother Anmol and several associates. Investigators also uncovered contact with a source in Pakistan for the procurement of AK-47 rifles, and a planned escape through Kanyakumari to Sri Lanka.
The bail ruling changes the legal standing of two individuals, but it does not close the case. It does, however, expose a tension at the heart of high-profile prosecutions: the pressure to act swiftly in the face of a real threat can lead the state to reach further than the evidence allows.
A Bombay High Court judge on February 6, 2025, ordered the release of two men arrested in connection with an alleged plot to kill Bollywood actor Salman Khan, finding that the evidence against them did not hold up. Gaurav Bhatia, also known as Sandeep Bishnoi, and Waspi Mehmud Khan, also known as Wasim Chikna, had been detained after police accused them of conducting surveillance near Khan's farmhouse in Panvel, his apartment in Bandra, and various film sets throughout 2024. The investigation centered on what authorities described as a conspiracy hatched by members of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang, a criminal organization with a documented history of violence.
Justice N R Borkar examined the case file and concluded that the prosecution's case was thin. The only substantive connection between the two men and the alleged plot was their membership in a WhatsApp group where the conspiracy was discussed. Beyond that, the judge found nothing concrete—no weapons recovered, no direct communications showing their involvement, no evidence of their participation in planning or reconnaissance. The court noted that even the messages in the group chat were vague and did not clearly implicate either man in any specific criminal act. The ruling effectively dismantled the state's case against them.
The defense had argued forcefully that the charges were exaggerated, designed primarily to generate headlines rather than to prosecute genuine suspects. Their lawyers pointed out that another accused in the same investigation, Deepak Gogoi, had already been granted bail by a sessions court in 2024, suggesting a pattern of weak prosecutorial footing. They also stressed that neither Bhatia nor Khan had any documented ties to the Bishnoi gang itself, and that nothing in the evidence suggested they had played any role in the alleged murder plot.
The larger investigation, however, paints a darker picture. Police say they have identified eighteen members of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang as part of the conspiracy. In April 2024, two gang members fired shots outside Khan's Bandra apartment in what authorities characterized as an assassination attempt. The FIR named gangster Lawrence Bishnoi himself, currently imprisoned in Ahmedabad, along with his brother Anmol Bishnoi, who remains at large, and associates including Sampat Nehra, Goldie Brar, and Rohit Godhara.
During their investigation, authorities uncovered evidence that one suspect had made contact with someone in Pakistan to arrange the purchase of AK-47 rifles for the attack. The gang, according to police, had devised an escape plan: regroup in Kanyakumari, then flee to Sri Lanka. Several key members were arrested before they could carry out this plan, but the investigation remains active and ongoing.
The bail ruling does not end the case. It simply means that Bhatia and Khan will remain free while the legal process continues. The court's decision underscores a fundamental problem in the prosecution's approach: suspicion and association are not the same as evidence of guilt. For Khan, the threat remains real—the April shooting was not a rumor or an allegation, but a documented event. Yet the judicial system has now determined that these two men cannot be held responsible for it based on what the state has presented.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
The court found that aside from WhatsApp group membership, there was no concrete proof linking them directly to the assassination attempt, and that even the group chats were vague.— Justice N R Borkar, Bombay High Court