In Goiânia this week, Flávio Bolsonaro — far-right frontrunner in Brazil's October 25 presidential runoff — pledged to 're-democratise' a nation his father was convicted of trying to subvert. The phrase carries the weight of history: in 1964, soldiers used nearly identical language before installing a dictatorship that lasted two decades. With his party now holding the largest senate caucus and allies enough to rewrite the constitution, critics warn that what sounds like restoration may be the grammar of a slower, more durable authoritarianism — one that does not seize power by force, but inhe
Bolsonaro's Son Vows to 'Re-democratise' Brazil, Stoking Coup Fears
Jair Bolsonaro imprisoned for 27 years for attempted coup; thousands jailed under similar authoritarian policies in El Salvador cited as model.
Democracy has a different meaning in the mouth of a coup-monger
Mark
So Flávio Bolsonaro won the first round and now he's talking about "re-democratising" Brazil. What does that actually mean?
Mimi
He hasn't said. That's part of what makes it alarming to people who study this. The phrase itself echoes language used by the 1964 coup plotters, who also claimed they were saving democracy.
Luke
But we should be careful here. He said the phrase once at a campaign event. We don't have a detailed policy platform. Are we reading authoritarianism into ambiguous language, or is there something concrete?
Mimi
There's the meeting with El Salvador's security minister, where the focus was on using congressional control to make "necessary legal changes." There's his party's 28 senate seats—enough to rewrite the constitution.
Mark
And his father is in prison for trying to stage a coup. That's the context everyone keeps mentioning.
Luke
Right, but Flávio explicitly denied he's trying to finish what his father started. He said "stop lying" and that Brazil needs to "go back to normal." Those are his actual words.
Mimi
Which is exactly what political scientists say authoritarians do—use the language of restoration and normalcy while dismantling constraints from within. It's not a dramatic coup; it's institutional capture.
Mark
So if he wins, what actually happens?
Mimi
His jailed co-conspirators get freed. His father likely becomes a minister. The supreme court gets reshaped. Constitutional changes become possible.
Luke
Those are plausible outcomes if he wins and has the votes. But "likely" is doing a lot of work there. We're in speculation territory about what he would actually do with that power.
Mark
What's the comparison people keep making?
Mimi
El Salvador under Bukele, Hungary under Orbán. Countries where authoritarians used democratic majorities to dismantle democratic safeguards from the inside.
Luke
Those are real examples, but they're not destiny. Brazil's institutions are different. Its supreme court has shown independence. We don't know how this plays out.
The Pulse
- Flávio Bolsonaro won Brazil's first-round vote and enters the October 25 runoff ahead of incumbent Lula, carrying the momentum of a far-right movement his imprisoned father built.
- His vow to 're-democratise' Brazil has alarmed historians and political scientists, who hear in it the same language the 1964 coup plotters used before installing a 21-year military dictatorship.
- His Liberal party's 28 senate seats — the chamber's largest caucus — combined with lower-house allies gives the movement the votes to amend the constitution, remove supreme court justices, and free jailed co-conspirators including Jair Bolsonaro.
- Recent meetings with El Salvador's Bukele government, where democratic constraints were dismantled through legislative control rather than military force, have sharpened fears about the model Flávio intends to follow.
- Prominent voices across journalism, academia, and the left warn that Flávio, unlike his father, would arrive with stronger congressional leverage, a weakened court, and US backing — tools that could make him more dangerous, not less.
- Brazil's democratic institutions now face their most consequential test: whether the language of renewal can be distinguished from the architecture of control before the runoff delivers a verdict on October 25.
In Goiânia this week, Flávio Bolsonaro — far-right frontrunner in Brazil's October 25 presidential runoff — pledged to 're-democratise' a nation his father was convicted of trying to subvert. The phrase carries the weight of history: in 1964, soldiers used nearly identical language before installing a dictatorship that lasted two decades. With his party now holding the largest senate caucus and allies enough to rewrite the constitution, critics warn that what sounds like restoration may be the grammar of a slower, more durable authoritarianism — one that does not seize power by force, but inherits it through law.
Standing before supporters in Goiânia this week, Flávio Bolsonaro declared himself the only force standing between Brazil and chaos. The 45-year-old far-right candidate, who won the first round of the presidential election and now leads the October 25 runoff against leftist incumbent Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, promised to 're-democratise' the country. Critics heard in that phrase an echo of the soldiers who seized power in 1964 — men who also claimed to be restoring democracy before installing a dictatorship that lasted until the 1980s.
Flávio's father, Jair, served under that same regime and has repeatedly praised it. Last year, Jair was sentenced to 27 years in prison for orchestrating a coup attempt after losing the 2022 election to Lula — a conspiracy that culminated in the January 8, 2023 riots in Brasília, widely compared to the storming of the US Capitol. Now his son speaks of remaking the nation's democratic architecture.
The numbers give that ambition real weight. Flávio's Liberal party secured 28 of the 81 senate seats — the chamber's largest caucus — and combined with lower-house allies, the far-right movement holds enough votes to alter the constitution, remove supreme court justices, and almost certainly free Jair and his imprisoned co-conspirators. Asked to define what 're-democratisation' actually meant, Flávio offered no specifics, telling reporters to 'stop lying' and insisting Brazil simply needed to 'go back to normal.'
Political scientists see a recognisable pattern. Flávio recently met with officials from El Salvador, where President Nayib Bukele dismantled democratic constraints through legislative control — rewriting the constitution, eliminating term limits, and jailing thousands under an extended state of exception. Bukele's security minister reportedly stressed to Flávio the importance of using congressional majorities to make 'necessary legal changes.' Political scientist Celso Rocha de Barros described the approach as a new generation of authoritarianism — one that corrodes democracy from within rather than overthrowing it by force, closer to Viktor Orbán's Hungary than to a traditional coup. 'Then you don't need to break any laws,' Barros said, 'because you are the law.'
The political response has been sharp. Leftist congresswoman Talíria Petrone called Flávio's comments 'the announcement of a coup.' Journalist Míriam Leitão warned in O Globo that if Flávio won, he would have tools his father lacked: stronger congressional caucuses, a weakened supreme court, and the backing of the Trump administration. 'The risk isn't of the son repeating the father,' she wrote. 'It's that he surpasses him.'
Brazil ranks 28th on the V-Dem liberal democracy index — a polarised but functioning multiparty system. What the October 25 runoff decides, and what follows if Flávio wins, will test whether democratic institutions can withstand pressure applied from within their own walls.
Flávio Bolsonaro stood before supporters in Goiânia this week and declared himself the only force standing between Brazil and chaos. The 45-year-old far-right candidate, who won the first round of the presidential election on Sunday and now leads the October 25 runoff against the incumbent leftist Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, promised to "re-democratise" the country. The phrase landed like a stone in still water. Critics heard in it an echo of language used by the military men who seized power in 1964, who also claimed they were acting to restore democracy—before installing a 21-year dictatorship that would not end until the 1980s.
Flávio's father, Jair Bolsonaro, spent his early career as a soldier under that same regime, a period he has repeatedly praised. Last year, Jair was sentenced to 27 years in prison for attempting to orchestrate a coup after losing the 2022 election to Lula. The conspiracy included efforts to convince military leaders to help him retain power, and it culminated in the January 8, 2023 riots in Brasília—a far-right insurrection that observers compared to the storming of the US Capitol two years earlier. Now his son, riding a wave of far-right momentum, speaks of remaking the nation's democratic architecture.
The numbers matter here. Flávio's Liberal party secured 28 of the 81 senate seats in this month's election, the largest caucus in that chamber. Combined with allies in the lower house, this gives the far-right movement the votes needed to alter the constitution. Political scientists note that such supermajorities would allow for sweeping institutional changes, including the removal of supreme court justices viewed as obstacles to the Bolsonaro movement. Jair Bolsonaro and his imprisoned co-conspirators would likely be freed. The former president could become an influential minister with power to select new military leadership.
When asked to explain what "re-democratisation" actually meant, Flávio offered no specifics. Instead, he rejected the suggestion that he aimed to complete what his father had started, telling reporters to "stop lying" and insisting Brazil simply needed to "go back to normal." But historians and political scientists who study democratic erosion see a familiar pattern. Flávio has recently met with officials from El Salvador, where President Nayib Bukele has dismantled democratic constraints by controlling congress and institutions, rewriting the constitution to eliminate presidential term limits and jailing thousands under an extended state of exception. During that meeting, Bukele's security minister stressed to Flávio the importance of using legislative control to make "necessary legal changes."
Celso Rocha de Barros, a political scientist, described Flávio's strategy as part of a new generation of authoritarianism—one that does not require a dramatic military coup but instead corrodes democracy from within by occupying and reshaping institutions. He compared the approach to Viktor Orbán's transformation of Hungary. "Then you don't need to break any laws to achieve authoritarianism," Barros said, "because you are the law." Danilo Araújo Marques, a historian, noted that the word "democracy" itself has been weaponized before in Brazil by those who meant to destroy it. The 1964 coup plotters used identical language. "Democracy has a different meaning in the mouth of a coup-monger," Marques observed.
The political response has been sharp. Talíria Petrone, a leftist congresswoman, called Flávio's comments "the announcement of a coup." Marcelo Freixo, a newly elected congressman from Lula's Workers' Party, pointed out the bitter irony: Brazil was re-democratised in 1988, and the person who tried to undo that work was Flávio's father, now convicted of attempting exactly that. Míriam Leitão, a prominent journalist, warned in the newspaper O Globo that if Flávio won, Brazil faced "the extreme and concrete danger" of another coup attempt. She noted that he would have tools his father lacked: strong congressional caucuses, a weakened supreme court, and the backing of the Trump administration. "The risk isn't of the son repeating the father," she wrote. "It's that he surpasses him."
Brazil ranks 28th on the V-Dem institute's liberal democracy index—ahead of the UK and well ahead of the US. It is a polarised but functioning multiparty system. What happens in the runoff on October 25, and what follows if Flávio wins, will test whether democratic institutions can withstand pressure from within, or whether the language of restoration can mask the architecture of authoritarian control.
Notable Quotes
The only thing standing in the way of Brazil becoming a barbarity is called Flávio Bolsonaro as president— Flávio Bolsonaro, at a campaign event in Goiânia
This is the announcement of a coup— Talíria Petrone, leftist congresswoman, on social media
Want the full story?
Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Politics & Governance